Newspapers Respond To PEPFAR Reauthorization Bills
Main Category: HIV / AIDSArticle Date: 30 Apr 2008 - 12:00 PDT
| Patient / Public: | ![]() |
|
| Health Professional: | ![]() |
4 (1 votes) |
| Article Opinions: | 0 posts |
The Seattle Post-Intelligencer and London's Guardian recently published an editorial and an opinion piece about bills (S 2731, HR 5501) that would reauthorize the President's Emergency Plan for AIDS Relief. Summaries appear below.
Editorial
Seattle Post-Intelligencer: PEPFAR requires an "early, decisive extension by Congress" because that would "send a strong signal to world leaders to join more decisively in their own efforts," a Post-Intelligencer editorial says. It adds that although the House passed its version of the reauthorization bill earlier this month, the Senate version has "encountered an unfortunate delay threat from" Sen. Tom Coburn (R-Okla.). With the Group of Eight industrialized nations summit "in Japan planned for July, it's important for the Senate to move quickly to avoid any kind of protracted delay from" Coburn for "exploiting Senate rules," the editorial says (Seattle Post-Intelligencer, 4/27).
Opinion Piece
Nina O'Farrell, Guardian: Although PEPFAR has achieved some "laudable" gains, the "effectiveness" of the program's funding is "undermined by clauses that are based on American conservative moral considerations rather than hard facts about how to prevent" HIV, O'Farrell, HIV/AIDS policy adviser for VSO, writes in an opinion piece in London's Guardian. "Despite consistent evidence that abstinence and faithfulness programs alone are not effective," the PEPFAR reauthorization bills still support such programs, O'Farrell writes, adding that the bills would require reports to Congress if abstinence and fidelity programs compose less than half of country-level spending on programs aimed at preventing sexual transmission of the virus. She concludes that President Bush "might yet be able to legitimately claim that PEPFAR is the 'most successful foreign aid program since the Marshall plan,' but only if" the "illogical restrictions upon it" are removed (O'Farrell, Guardian, 4/16).
Reprinted with kind permission from http://www.kaisernetwork.org. You can view the entire Kaiser Daily Health Policy Report, search the archives, or sign up for email delivery at http://www.kaisernetwork.org/dailyreports/healthpolicy. The Kaiser Daily Health Policy Report is published for kaisernetwork.org, a free service of The Henry J. Kaiser Family Foundation.
© 2008 Advisory Board Company and Kaiser Family Foundation. All rights reserved.
|
Please rate this article: (Hover over the stars then click to rate) |
Patient / Public: |
or |
Health Professional: |
Add to:
Contact Our News Editors
For any corrections of factual information, or to contact the editors please use our feedback form.
![]()
Please send any medical news or health news press releases to:
| Back to top | Back to front page | List of All Medical Articles |
| Privacy Policy | Terms and Conditions | © 2008 MediLexicon International Ltd |




