New Findings On Mercury Content In Salmon
Editor's ChoiceMain Category: Nutrition / Diet
Also Included In: Water - Air Quality / Agriculture; Biology / Biochemistry
Article Date: 04 Jun 2008 - 0:00 PDT
| Patient / Public: | ![]() |
4.35 (17 votes) |
| Healthcare Prof: | ![]() |
3.75 (8 votes) |
| Article Opinions: | 2 posts |
A new study published in Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry finds that although mercury levels in both wild and farmed salmon from British Columbia are substantially below human health consumption guidelines, the levels found in wild salmon were three times higher than in farmed salmon.
A large proportion of the farmed salmon consumed in the United States originates in British Columbia, Canada. Over the years, there have been health concerns because high levels of methylmercury have been found in long-lived fish species nearer to the top of the food chain - such as tuna and salmon. High mercury levels have been associated with an increase in the risk of cancer, and this has led many people to avoid consuming certain fishes.
This most recent study has determined that levels of mercury and other trace metals measured in both farmed and wild salmon were significantly below Health Canada's consumption guidelines. Compared to wild salmon, the researchers found that farmed salmon did not have significantly higher concentrations of metals such as arsenic, cobalt, copper, or cadmium. The threefold higher mercury concentration observed in the flesh of wild salmon than in farmed salmon is potentially explained by farmed salmon's low gastrointestinal absorption efficiency, its negligible transfer of metals to muscle tissue, and its rapid growth cycles (growth dilution). In farmed fish, there were no differences in metal levels found between pre- and post-processing.
For comparison to other parts of the human diet, the researchers indicate that total mercury levels were slightly higher in wild or farmed salmon than in chicken, beef, or pork and about the same as in fruit, vegetables, honey, and eggs. Compared to other foods, salmon contains lower levels of other trace elements. The average dietary intake of mercury and trace metals from salmon still remains a paltry 0.05% to 32% compared to the 68% to 99% that is absorbed from meat, poultry, fruit, and vegetables. Salmon also contains its own protection against mercury in the form of the element selenium. The moderate surplus of this metal can counteract mercury's toxicity.
"Estimates of human dietary exposure indicate that human health risks associated with trace metal exposure via consumption of farmed and wild British Columbia salmon are negligible," conclude the authors. "The current scientific evidence therefore supports the weekly consumption of oily fish species (including all British Columbia salmon sources) as recommended by the American Heart Association."
Mercury and Other Trace Elements in Farmed and Wild Salmon from British Columbia, Canada
Barry C. Kelly, Michael G. Ikonomou, David A. Higgs, Janice Oakes, and Cory Dubetz
Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry (2008). Vol. 27(6):1361-1370.
Click here to view paper
Written by: Peter M Crosta
Copyright: Medical News Today
Not to be reproduced without permission of Medical News Today
MLA
14 Feb. 2012. <http://www.medicalnewstoday.com/articles/109789.php>
APA
http://www.medicalnewstoday.com/articles/109789.php.
Please note: If no author information is provided, the source is cited instead.
|
Rate this article: (Hover over the stars then click to rate) |
Patient / Public: |
or |
Health Professional: |
Visitor Opinions In Chronological Order (2)
Funding For Salmon/mercury Study
posted by Kathy Kelley on 4 Jun 2008 at 10:04 amI would be interested, and it would be critical to understanding the legitimacy of this study, to know who funded this study. The wording of the abstract suggests protection of a market may be at the core of the intent.
All abstracts should include the funders of the study to better assess their neutrality.
Gov. Regulators and fish industry
posted by Les on 21 Nov 2010 at 11:11 pmGovernment regulators and the seafood industry are doing little to protect public health and, in fact, have been placing consumers at risk for decades by “knowingly allowing millions of Americans to eat seafood with unsafe levels of mercury.”
Add Your Opinion
Please note that we publish your name, but we do not publish your email address. It is only used to let you know when your message is published. We do not use it for any other purpose. Please see our privacy policy for more information.
If you write about specific medications or operations, please do not name health care professionals by name.
All opinions are moderated before being included (to stop spam)
Contact Our News Editors
For any corrections of factual information, or to contact the editors please use our feedback form.
![]()
Please send any medical news or health news press releases to:
Note: Any medical information published on this website is not intended as a substitute for informed medical advice and you should not take any action before consulting with a health care professional. For more information, please read our terms and conditions.







