Search is Powered by Google
Pregnancy / Obstetrics News

BJOG Release: Previous Caesarean Section Not Linked To Stillbirth In Second Pregnancy

Main Category: Pregnancy / Obstetrics
Also Included In: Women's Health / Gynecology
Article Date: 11 Jun 2008 - 13:00 PDT

email icon email to a friend   printer icon printer friendly   write icon view / write opinions   rate icon rate article
Current Article Ratings:

Patient / Public:not yet rated

Health Professional:not yet rated

Article Opinions: 0 posts

A new study published in BJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology has found that, contrary to the findings in other recent research, a previous caesarean section does not increase the risk of stillbirth in the second pregnancy.

The researchers, from the University of Calgary in Alberta, Canada, investigated the connection because they were concerned that previous research had failed to account for the effect of maternal obesity which is associated with both caesarean birth and stillbirth.

The study included 157, 929 second births with information obtained on demographic characteristics, pregnancy complications, mode of delivery and outcome of live or stillbirth. Information on factors that could impact on the results such as maternal diabetes, maternal weight, hypertension and smoking during pregnancy was also extracted. However, exact maternal weight data was not available therefore women were categorised as less than or greater than 91 kg.

Initially the study looked at the total number of antepartum stillbirths in both groups. Overall there were 331 antepartum stillbirths giving a rate of 3.0/1000 in the previous caesarean group compared to 2.7/1000 in the previous vaginal delivery group.

The data were than adjusted to exclude other potential contributing factors such as significant fetal abnormality, maternal trauma such as a motor vehicle accident during pregnancy and infection such as cytomegalovirus. Once these factors were taken into account, there were a total of 265 antenatal stillbirths, 63 (2.1/1000) in the previous caesarean group and 202 (1.6/1000) in the previous vaginal birth group.

Further, the data prior to 1996 did not include complete information on a number of significant factors such as maternal weight, smoking during pregnancy, pre-pregnancy diabetes and hypertension, the data was then adjusted to exclude these participants from the final analysis. Thus the sample size reduced from 157, 929 to 132, 590 and the stillbirth number reduced from 265 to 210. In this analysis, previous caesarean section did not demonstrate a statistically significant increase in stillbirth risk.

Dr Stephen Wood, Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University of Calgary, said "Our study strongly suggests that previous caesarean section does not increase the risk of stillbirth in subsequent pregnancies. Although previous research has made a link between the two, it is likely that maternal obesity played a part as it was not controlled for.

"Obesity has been a consistently observed risk factor for both stillbirth and caesarean section. It has been difficult for investigators, including us, to adequately control for this factor as good anthropometric data is often not available in large perinatal databases. Indeed we were limited to using maternal weight of 91kg or more as a cut-off for obesity, however this is more than other studies have done. As caesarean section is increasingly common and stillbirth is a very important outcome further research in this area is required."

Professor Philip Steer, BJOG editor-in-chief, said: "Caesarean section rates are increasing across the developed world and the increase in risks for subsequent pregnancies have been well-documented. The increase in stillbirth risk previously reported was especially concerning, so it is somewhat reassuring that the study by Dr Wood and his team suggests that this may have been due to the confounding factor of maternal obesity. Because of the growing prevalence of caesarean section, further research is needed to ascertain in more detail the pros and cons of c-section delivery".

Notes

BJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology is owned by the Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists (RCOG) but is editorially independent and published monthly by Wiley-Blackwell. The journal features original, peer-reviewed, high-quality medical research in all areas of obstetrics and gynaecology worldwide. Please quote 'BJOG' or 'BJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology' when referring to the journal.

Reference

The risk of unexplained antepartum stillbirth in second pregnancies following caesarean section in the first pregnancy.
Wood SL, Chen S, Ross S, Sauve R.
BJOG 2008;115:726-731.

Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists




Customized Homepage Weekly Newsletters Daily News Alerts
Home About Us News Licensing Free Website Feeds Free Tools & Content Links Tell a Friend Accessibility Help / FAQ Article Submission Contact Us
Psychiatry Urology
Bipolar Diabetes Schizophrenia

add medical news today to your facebook

medical news gadget

Add to Google


developers
website gadget code
website news code
medical news rss feed links


MedReader RSS Reader

customize your homepage


These are the most read articles from this news category for the last 6 months:
Top Article Star
Nausea During Pregnancy (Morning Sickness)
20 Jun 2008
It is common for a pregnant woman to live through nausea and vomiting during her first few months of pregnancy. It is difficult to predict whether it is going to happen. Some women have no nausea during their first...


Pregnant Exercise image Pregnant Exercise

Pregnant women can benefit from exercise in several ways. Learn how and guidelines to follow during exercise regimens...

Talking with Your Doctor image Talking with Your Doctor

Talking with your doctor can sometimes be difficult. Good health care, however, depends on an open dialogue between patients and doctors...

View more videos...