HIV Prevention Requires Combining Multiple Methods
Editor's ChoiceMain Category: HIV / AIDS
Also Included In: Infectious Diseases / Bacteria / Viruses; Immune System / Vaccines
Article Date: 07 Aug 2008 - 0:00 PDT
Researchers argue that a combination of behavioral, medical, and structural approaches grounded on solid evidence, known as combination prevention, is the best hope for successfully preventing HIV in the future. In the first of six papers in The Lancet Series on HIV prevention, Professor Michael Merson (Duke Global Health Institute, Duke University, Durham, NC, USA), Jeffrey O'Malley (HIV/AIDS Practice, UN Development Program, New York, USA) and colleagues insist that the mistakes of the mid-1990s cannot be repeated.
The authors outline the brief history of the HIV/AIDS pandemic. In 1981, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, USA, published the first confirmed reports of AIDS. In recent years, researchers have developed antiretroviral drug (ARV) treatment, and donor programs are discussed at high level UN meetings. Merson and O'Malley also detail the difficulties seen worldwide in accepting and acknowledging the disease as well as the inconsistent and poor responses of many governments in the earlier years. For example, in the mid-1990s the pandemic expanded substantially as many countries reduced political and financial support for HIV/AIDS issues. "Early prevention successes evolved from collective responses generated by people living with HIV/AIDS and community groups, and confronted the stigma, discrimination, and denial associated with the disease. A global response, involving social factors such as sexual behaviour, injecting drug use, and gender inequalities, is needed to fully address the HIV/AIDS pandemic," write the authors.
Analyzing data on country-specific HIV cases and incidence, the researchers maintain that current global prevention efforts are still unacceptable - fewer than 10% of at-risk individuals in the world receive important prevention services. "Expansion of these services could avert more than half the HIV infections projected to occur by 2015 and save $24 billion in treatment costs," they write. If 70% of males are circumcised, according to one study, about 700,000 cases of HIV could be prevented in sub-Saharan Africa up to 2015. Although the last five years has seen a tenfold increase in the number of people receiving ARV therapy, there are five new HIV infections for every two patients on ARVs in 2007.
The authors say that resources are not available to reach the goals set out in the 2006 UN World Summit - that is, a US$42.2 billion package for HIV prevention and care leading to almost universal coverage by 2010. "Successful prevention requires knowledge of the nature of the epidemic in individual countries, as well as community and country contexts," they write. More parties are recommending that HIV prevention be combined with an overall strengthening of the health system in every affected country. The researchers write: "We need not only more managers, public-health experts, physicians, and nurses, but also a new cadre of community workers whose education is rooted in community development, gender equity, human rights, and public health, and who will be equally powerful in the promotion of hygiene, sanitation and use of bednets as they are in the generation of a community response to HIV prevention."
"We now require an urgent and revitalised global movement for HIV prevention that supports a combination of behavioural, structural, and biomedical approaches and is based on scientifically derived evidence and the wisdom and ownership of communities...With millions of people on treatment and the incidence of HIV infection falling in places, many involved in public health and public policy are calling for a shift of attention from HIV to other diseases...HIV prevention must remain one of the world's top health and development priorities - now and for a generation to come. The mistakes of the mid-1990s, when HIV/AIDS slipped down the political agenda and the pandemic greatly expanded, must not be repeated," conclude the authors.
The history and challenge of HIV prevention
Jeffrey O'Malley et al.
The Lancet (2008).
Click Here to View Journal Web Site
Written by: Peter M Crosta
Copyright: Medical News Today
Not to be reproduced without permission of Medical News Today
MLA
14 Feb. 2012. <http://www.medicalnewstoday.com/articles/117315.php>
APA
http://www.medicalnewstoday.com/articles/117315.php.
Please note: If no author information is provided, the source is cited instead.
|
Rate this article: (Hover over the stars then click to rate) |
Patient / Public: |
or |
Health Professional: |
Visitor Opinions In Chronological Order (1)
Continuing to Overlook Post - Sex Hygiene
posted by Toby Marotta Ph.D. on 8 Aug 2008 at 4:58 pmThis "medicalnewstoday.com" report on the sextet of articles about preventing HIV/AIDS in the current issue of "The Lancet" reflects still more of the conventional wisdom and professional jargon that people concerned about this epidemic have been seeing, hearing, and reading for more than 25 years.
By now the degree of "AIDS Fatigue" among outsiders is such that none but involved professionals and committed activists pay much attention to what is being done today, let alone why.
To this professional ethnographer, who has been assessing AIDS prevention efforts in the U.S.A. from the start of this epidemic, the root of ongoing ineffectiveness and general tuning out is obvious. By emphasizing the prevention potential of abstinence, monogamy, and condom use, which none but middle and upper-class people are in a position to embrace, the public- health officials and medical researchers in charge of preventing HIV/AIDS are failing to accommodate the far less rational drives characteristic of poor, weak, and stigmatized people, especially in developing countries, who continue to be most afflicted with these and other sexually transmitted diseases.
In the absence of an effective vaccine, viable AIDS-prevention policies must accommodate underclass, outlaw, and foreign-culture realities in order to be viable. Both microbicides and male circumcision presume that the men and women most at risk for getting and spreading HIV infections have the intellect, understanding, foresight, desire, willpower, and discipline it takes to undertake such protective measures AHEAD of time.
Instead of steps that raise suspicions and threaten their prospects of sexual success BEFOREHAND, however, these at-risk populations need something easy that can be done in private AFTER they have engaged in possibly risky sex.
This understanding of human nature and social structure is what has led military medics and others concerned about preventing traditional STDs like syphilis and gonorrhea to recommend washing genitals with soap and water AFTER sex for this purpose. Even in this day of widely available and relatively unobtrusive condoms, branches of the U.S. military continue to tout the virtues of POST-SEX washing to prevent STDs.
Since 1993, Nigel O'Farrell, M.D., a British researcher affiliated with the London School of Hygiene and Tropical Diseases, has published a series of studies done in South Africa that demonstrate and explain why post-sex penile washing can prevent HIV infections. Presumably O'Farrell's work is one of the reasons that South Africa refuses to join the current U.S. National Institute of Health-driven bandwagon for male circumcision in developing countries.
In addition to overlooking this relevant history, this "medicalnewstoday.com" review of "The Lancet's" review says nothing about the paradigm-changing implications of the report on the most significant piece of U.S.-funded research to demonstrate the effectiveness of post-sex washing as a technique for reducing HIV infections. A report on this research, undertaken with the help of King K. Holmes, M.D., Ph.D., widely considerd the dean of STD studies in the U.S.A., was published in the respected "Journal of AIDS" in 2006.
As it is, beginning in 1996, the leading authoritative popular book about dealing with HIV infections and AIDS -- Professor John Bartlett's "The Handbook of Living with HIV Infections" (Johns Hopkins University Press, 1996, 2001, 2006) -- recommended that condom use be supplemented by washing genitals after sex to reduce the risk of getting and spreading HIV infections.
Ever since 1996 dozens of leading private healthcare providers based in the U.S.A. have included this recommendation in their books and web sites. On MedlinePlus.org, the health information directory published by the U.S. National Library of Medicine, you can bring up a directory page of recommended sites about STD and AIDS prevention that includes several sources of this recommendation. One is its introductory tutorial on STDS. Another is the STD discussion found on the site of the American Association of Family Physicians.
Here in the U.S.A., privately funded health education sites, such as IntelliHealth.com, which carries health information supplied and officially approved by "Faculty of the Harvard Medical School," continue to recommend post-sex washing as a complement to condom use.
Sooner or later, I'm afraid, the drive to promote male circumcision now being undertaken by researchers and reporters who have latched onto to this proxy for penile hygiene will be viewed as a tack initiated and publicized by well-intentioned officials who were and remain naive about the oldest approach to preventing STDs in the world: washing involved body parts after sex.
Add Your Opinion
Please note that we publish your name, but we do not publish your email address. It is only used to let you know when your message is published. We do not use it for any other purpose. Please see our privacy policy for more information.
If you write about specific medications or operations, please do not name health care professionals by name.
All opinions are moderated before being included (to stop spam)
Contact Our News Editors
For any corrections of factual information, or to contact the editors please use our feedback form.
![]()
Please send any medical news or health news press releases to:
Note: Any medical information published on this website is not intended as a substitute for informed medical advice and you should not take any action before consulting with a health care professional. For more information, please read our terms and conditions.




