New Screening Guidelines: Don't Test Men Over 75 For Prostate Cancer
Editor's ChoiceMain Category: Prostate / Prostate Cancer
Also Included In: Men's health; Medical Devices / Diagnostics
Article Date: 13 Aug 2008 - 0:00 PST
| Patient / Public: | ![]() |
4.8 (5 votes) |
| Healthcare Prof: | ![]() |
5 (1 votes) |
| Article Opinions: | 1 posts |
Over the age of 75 years, men should no longer be screened for prostate cancer, according to recommendations from the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force published on August 5, 2008 in the Annals of Internal Medicine. Additionally, they indicate that younger men should discuss the potential risks and benefits of the prostate-specific antigen (PSA) treatment with their doctors before performing the test.
Prostate cancer affects this small gland in the male reproductive system. In 2007, approximately 218,890 men were diagnosed with prostate cancer in the U.S.. One in six men will receive this diagnosis at some point in his lifetime. Currently, screening is performed using a digital rectal exam or the PSA test. While the PSA test has a higher sensitivity and is more likely to detect cancer, these cancers are usually in very early stages and thus take years to affect the man's health. Often, cancers detected with this tests take more than 10 years to take hold.
The screening process, while relatively standard, can be associated with some physical and psychological harms. Physically, the man must undergo biopsies, and there is the chance for unnecessary treatment. Psychologically, false positives may be detected, leading to anxiety. The treatment of prostate cancer itself can have complications including urinary incontinence and impotence. However, early stage untreated cancers rarely cause any of these side effects -- meaning that, at a certain age, it is possible that man is harmed by being screened for prostate cancer with few potential benefits.
Men older than 75 in the U.S. have an average expectancy of approximately 10 years, and in this population, death is more likely to occur due to heart disease or stroke, rendering knowledge about prostate cancer status largely moot. Thanks to this, screening for prostate cancer, according to the Task Force, provided relatively few health benefits while still leading to harm which was mostly physical but partially psychological when men are 75 and older.
Men younger than 75 can also have a life expectancy shorter than the next ten years as a result of chronic diseases. Individuals in this population are also unlikely to benefit from screening.
For younger men, they concluded that there is not sufficient evidence to balance the risks and harms, so each individual should assess his risks separately.
The Task Force Chair, Ned Calonge, M.D., M.P.H., summarizes: "Because many prostate cancers grow slowly, early detection may not benefit a patient's health and in some cases may even cause harm." He continues, explaining current policies on the screening process: "We encourage men younger than 75 to discuss with their clinicians the potential--but uncertain--benefits and the possible harms of getting the PSA test before they decide to be screened."
Nearly one-third of all men in the U.S. over the age of 75 are having PSA testing performed, according to current data. Most medical organizations suggest that it is prudent to discontinue screening when an individual has an average expectancy of less than 10 years, but this is the first explicit age to be specified for this test. There are presently two ongoing studies that will help elucidate the potential benefits of screening in men under 75: the National Cancer Institute's (NCI) Prostate, Lung, Colorectal and Ovarian Cancer Screening Trial and the European Study of Screening for Prostate Cancer.
This Task force is an independent panel of experts in prevention and primary care, with a mission to conduct rigorous, impartial analyses of the evidence for and against many clinical preventive services such as screening, counseling, and preventive medications. for clinical preventive services, the Task Force defines many of the gold standard methods.
For clinicians, additional information can be found on the Agency for Health Care Research and Quality website or AHRQ's National Guideline Clearinghouse.
For men who have been diagnosed with prostate cancer, information about treatment can be found on the effective health care portion of the AHRQ website, describing effective health care.
Screening for Prostate Cancer: U.S. Preventive Services Task Force Recommendation Statement
U.S. Preventive Services Task Force
Annals Internal Medicine, 5 August 2008, Volume 149, Issue 3, Pages 185-191
Click Here For Abstract
Written by Anna Sophia McKenney
Copyright: Medical News Today
Not to be reproduced without permission of Medical News Today
MLA
15 Feb. 2012. <http://www.medicalnewstoday.com/articles/118053.php>
APA
http://www.medicalnewstoday.com/articles/118053.php.
Please note: If no author information is provided, the source is cited instead.
|
Rate this article: (Hover over the stars then click to rate) |
Patient / Public: |
or |
Health Professional: |
Visitor Opinions In Chronological Order (1)
Prostate Cancer Testing In Older Men
posted by Manny Oak Park MI on 13 Aug 2008 at 2:36 pmI vigorously disagree with the Preventive Services Task Force recommendation not to test men 75 and older. In 2004, at age 75, I was diagnosed with high grade (Gleason 9) prostate cancer. I was treated with external radiation plus hormone suppression. I was in good health at the time and could easily have lived another 10-15 years. I am in excellent condition now, my doctors tell me, and so far no sign of reccurrence. I commented to my urologist, what if I had not been tested and treated and he took the following words right out of my mouth: You would be dead by now.
My brother was earlier diagnosed with high grade prostate cancer which spread to his bones and other organs. In spite of aggressive treatment he died in less than five years.
The only way to know if your cancer is aggressive is to test for it. No test and you might not survive more than a couple of years.
Apparently the Task Force feels that healthy 70 and 80 year-olds are disposable. Their report actually says that men 75 and older should be "discouraged" from getting tested. They should get out of their offices and talk to the survivors and see how many of us regret getting tested and treated.
Add Your Opinion
Please note that we publish your name, but we do not publish your email address. It is only used to let you know when your message is published. We do not use it for any other purpose. Please see our privacy policy for more information.
If you write about specific medications or operations, please do not name health care professionals by name.
All opinions are moderated before being included (to stop spam)
Contact Our News Editors
For any corrections of factual information, or to contact the editors please use our feedback form.
![]()
Please send any medical news or health news press releases to:
Note: Any medical information published on this website is not intended as a substitute for informed medical advice and you should not take any action before consulting with a health care professional. For more information, please read our terms and conditions.



