HER2 Breast Cancer Vaccine Shows Promise In Lab
Featured ArticleMain Category: Breast Cancer
Also Included In: Immune System / Vaccines; Cancer / Oncology
Article Date: 15 Sep 2008 - 2:00 PDT
| Patient / Public: | ![]() |
4 (16 votes) |
| Healthcare Prof: | ![]() |
3.86 (7 votes) |
| Article Opinions: | 1 posts |
Researchers in the US are hoping that their new breast cancer vaccine will be effective in humans because it safely destroyed HER2-positive tumors, even those resistant to anti-HER2 drugs, when tested on mice.
The study was the work of scientists at the School of Medicine and Karmanos Cancer Institute, Wayne State University, Detroit, Michigan, and is published in the September 15 issue of Cancer Research, a journal of the American Association for Cancer Research.
HER2 (Human Epidermal growth factor Receptor 2) is a receptor that sits on the surface of cells in breast tissue. Their normal job is to promote cell growth, but when there are too many of them, the growth becomes uncontrolled and forms very aggressive tumors. Up to 30 per cent of breast cancers are of this HER2-positive type.
Conventional treatments rely on drugs like Herceptin (trastuzumab) and Tykerb (lapatinib) that bind to and disable the HER2 receptors, but a significant number of patients eventually become resistant to them.
The researchers hope this study will lead to a vaccine for women with HER2-positive breast cancer that has become resistant to treatment, or perhaps stop it recurring. They said it also shows promise as a cancer-prevention vaccine in women who are cancer free.
Principal investigator Dr Wei-Zen Wei, professor of immunology and microbiology at the Karmanos Cancer Institute, said the vaccine activated the patient's own immune system to destroy the cancer.
"The immune response against HER2-positive receptors we saw in this study is powerful, and works even in tumors that are resistant to current therapies," said Wei.
"The vaccine could potentially eliminate the need to even use these therapies," she added.
When there is a low level of HER2, such as that expressed when they are on the surface of normal cells, the immune system ignores them. But if there is a sudden and enormous change in HER2 receptors, the immune system responds as if to an attack and learns very quickly to destroy them.
This was the mechanism that Wei and colleagues decided to provoke, using "naked" DNA genes to produce the HER2 receptors, and a stimulant to boost the immune system response. They used a bacterial plasmid to encapsulate these two ingredients and then with the aid of electrical pulses they injected them into the leg muscles of mice.
The stimulant the researchers injected at the same time as the HER2 gene, was an agent that temporarily suppresses the regulatory T cells that stop the immune system from over-reacting, thus causing a much stronger reaction than normal and giving the immunisation process a head start.
The gene very quickly produced large numbers of HER2 receptors and the immune system responded with large numbers of antibodies and killer T cells. When they implanted HER2-positive breast tumors in the animals, the cancer was eradicated. As Wei explained:
"Both tumor cells that respond to current targeted therapies and those that are resistant to these treatments were eradicated."
"This may be an answer for women with these tumors who become resistant to the current therapies," she added.
This is the second HER2 DNA vaccine that Wei and her team have developed. The first was in 1999, when they published a study that led to the development of a vaccine that is currently in early phase clinical trials in the US and Europe on women with HER2-positive breast cancer.
The new version uses HER2 genes that have been altered so they can't become "oncogenic". The earlier version retained traces of the underlying receptor structure, and when this happens there is a slight risk this can trigger tumor formation later, because the "signalling" system of the receptor is still active and can communicate with the cell nucleus.
Wei said the first vaccine was safe, but it contained a bit more of the "native" HER2 receptor structure, whereas "With this vaccine, I am quite certain the receptor is functionally dead," she said.
Wei said that their ultimated goal was to protect against cancer developing in the first place, which is "the greatest power of vaccination".
"DNA Vaccination Controls Her-2+ Tumors that Are Refractory to Targeted Therapies."
Paula J. Whittington, Marie P. Piechocki, Henry H. Heng, Jennifer B. Jacob, Richard F. Jones, Jessica B. Back, and Wei-Zen Wei
Cancer Res 68, 7502-7511, September 15, 2008.
doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-08-1489
Click here for Abstract.
Source: Journal abstract, American Association for Cancer Research.
Written by: Catharine Paddock, PhD
Copyright: Medical News Today
Not to be reproduced without permission of Medical News Today
MLA
14 Feb. 2012. <http://www.medicalnewstoday.com/articles/121459.php>
APA
http://www.medicalnewstoday.com/articles/121459.php.
Please note: If no author information is provided, the source is cited instead.
|
Rate this article: (Hover over the stars then click to rate) |
Patient / Public: |
or |
Health Professional: |
Visitor Opinions In Chronological Order (1)
Breast Cancer Most Efficacious Clinical Primary Prevention
posted by Sergio Stagnaro on 15 Sep 2008 at 3:14 amMy 52 year-long clinical experience allows me to state that the most efficacious primary prevention of cancer, including breast cancer, is based on the knowledge of Oncological Terrain and OT-dependent Inherited Real Risk (1-5).
Using breast cancer genetic risk assessment tools and going through the process of assessing breast cancer risk by this expensive way, can answer many women's questions about what puts them at relatively higher or lower risk. Certainly such as evaluation is expensive for both NHS and single patient, and not applicable on women (and men!, of course) on very large scale.
In fact, for all women (and men!), an original clinical assessement may be desirable that in an easy and reliable manner allows to bedside recognize the possible presence of maternally-inherited ICAEM-dependent (coneginta mitochondrial cytopathy), Oncological Terrain and OT-dependent Inherited Real Risk, conditio sine qua non of cancer (1, 2), avoiding possibly genetic testing, but ascertaining also breast cancer oncological “inherited real risk” in well-defined breast quadrant(s), characterized by newborn-pathological, type I, subtype a) i.e., oncological,, Endoarteriolar Blocking Devices, I have discovered (1-5).
In addition, testing for mutations of breast cancer susceptibility genes or for their diminished expression, necessary to beginn whatever primary prevention, adds to our ability to assess breast cancer risk at an individual level. Really, we cannot localise in a (or more) mamma quadrant the possible breast cancer risk in BRCA 1 and BRCA 2, as well as a lot of other gene mutations-positive women (and men!). Quantum Biophysical Semeiotics (http://www.semeioticabiofisica.it, Breast Cancer in Practical Application; Oncological Terrain) allows doctor to recognize firstly oncological terrain in a quantitative way, and then, bu “not” in all cases, of course, breast cancer inherited real risk: individuals with oncological terrain do not show generally congenital real risk in all biological systems (3). Interestingly, the absence of both Oncological Terrain and breast cancer oncological “Inherited Real Risk”, the later Oncological Terrain-dependent, excludes beyond every doubt the possibility of occurrence of breast cancer in life spann (2, 3). As a consequence, we can perform nowadays an efficacious clinical, primary prevention of breast cancer (4), on very large scale, based on the Single Patient Based Medicine (5-10), as suggests also Planning for the EU public Health Portal at URL:
http://www.google.it/search?q=cache:U5A-DtWmRDsJ:europa.eu.int/comm/health/ph_information/documents/ev_20030710_co01_en.pdf+single+patient+based+medicine+and+stagnaro&hl=it&ie=UTF-8 Pg 36.
Finally, “real” sentinel limphonodes are trigger-points for autoimmune syndrome (3)
References
1) Stagnaro Sergio. There is another clinical, and overlooked tool, reliable in breast cancer prognosis evaluation , 2005. http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2407/5/70/comments#204473
2) Stagnaro Sergio, Stagnaro-Neri Marina. Introduzione alla Semeiotica Biofisica. Il Terreno oncologico. Travel Factory SRL., Roma, 2004.
http://www.travelfactory.it/semeiotica_biofisica.htm
3) Stagnaro-Neri M., Stagnaro S. Cancro della mammella: : prevenzione primaria e diagnosi precoce con la percussione ascoltata. Gazz. Med. It.; Arch. Sc. Med. 152, 447, 1993.
4) Stagnaro S. Lettera aperta al Ministro della Salute, Prof. G. Sirchia, sulla prevenzione primaria clinica del cancro mammario.
http://www.katamed.it/Notizia.asp?id=8094&lingua=IT&idcat=999;
http://xoomer.virgilio.it/piazzetta/professione/professione.htm
http://www.ilpungolo.com/site/leggi.asp?NWS=2390&IDS=10.
http://bmj.bmjjournals.com/cgi/eletters?lookup=by_date&days=1#72216 27 August 2004
5) Stagnaro S., Stagnaro-Neri M. Single Patient Based Medicine.La Medicina Basata sul Singolo Paziente: Nuove Indicazioni della Melatonina. Travel Factory SRL., Roma, 2005. http://www.travelfactory.it/semeiotica_biofisica.htm
6) Stagnaro S. Newborn-pathological Endoarteriolar Blocking Devices in Diabetic and Dislipidaemic Constitution and Diabetes Primary Prevention. The Lancet. March 06 2007. http://www.thelancet.com/journals/lancet/article/
PIIS0140673607603316/comments?totalcomments=1
7) Stagnaro Sergio. There is another clinical, and overlooked tool, reliable in breast cancer prognosis evaluation , 2005. http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2407/5/70/comments#204473
8) Stagnaro Sergio. "Genes, Oncological Terrain, and Breast Cancer" World Journal of Surgical Oncology., 2005, http://www.wjso.com/content/3/1/45/comments#205475
9) Stagnaro Sergio. Bed-Side Evaluating Breast Cancer Real Risk. World Journal of Surgical Oncology. 2005, 3:67 doi:10.1186/1477-7819-3-67. 2005
10) Stagnaro Sergio Mitochondrial Bed-Side Evaluation: a new Way in the War against Cancer (21 December 2005). Cancer Cell International http://www.cancerci.com/content/5/1/34/comments#218502
Add Your Opinion
Please note that we publish your name, but we do not publish your email address. It is only used to let you know when your message is published. We do not use it for any other purpose. Please see our privacy policy for more information.
If you write about specific medications or operations, please do not name health care professionals by name.
All opinions are moderated before being included (to stop spam)
Contact Our News Editors
For any corrections of factual information, or to contact the editors please use our feedback form.
![]()
Please send any medical news or health news press releases to:
Note: Any medical information published on this website is not intended as a substitute for informed medical advice and you should not take any action before consulting with a health care professional. For more information, please read our terms and conditions.




