FDA Says BPA Food Plastic Is Safe But Awaits New Panel Report
Featured ArticleMain Category: Nutrition / Diet
Also Included In: Regulatory Affairs / Drug Approvals; Pediatrics / Children's Health
Article Date: 17 Sep 2008 - 9:00 PDT
| Patient / Public: | ![]() |
4 (1 votes) |
| Healthcare Prof: | ![]() |
4 (1 votes) |
| Article Opinions: | 1 posts |
As the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) awaits final recommendations from an expert panel, the agency is tentatively defending its current position that products made with BPA (bisphenol A) are safe, while also giving tips to consumers on how to reduce their exposure to the chemical which can be found in trace amounts in over 90 per cent of people in the US. The current view from the FDA is that the levels are too low to cause harm, even in babies and children.
Because of its ability to make plastic hard, BPA is used in a wide range of consumer and medical products, from baby bottles to sunglasses and CDs, and in the coating inside metal food and drink cans.
According to a report by the Associated Press, Director of FDA's Office of Food Additive Safety, Center for Food Safety and Applied Nutrition, Dr Laura Tarantino told reporters:
"Right now, our tentative conclusion is that it's safe, so we're not recommending any change in habits."
But Tarantino then went to say that, "there are a number of things people can do to lower their exposure."
An FDA advisory committee met on Tuesday 16th September to review the evidence on BPA, at the same time as the Journal of the American Medical Association published a study suggesting that higher levels of urinary BPA were linked to higher risk of cardiovascular disease, type 2 diabetes and liver-enzyme abnormalities. The preliminary study was based on evidence from 1,500 adults and the authors said the findings were strong enough to warrant further investigation.
The panel is due to give its final recommendations towards the end of October.
Tarantino acknowledged the need for more research, but said the evidence from animal studies, which have been more thorough than those on humans, does not support the suggestion that BPA is harmful at the levels currently found in the population.
To reduce exposure to BPA, the FDA suggests consumers:
- Avoid plastic containers showing the number 7 in the recycling symbol.
- Avoid heating up food (for example in a microwave) in such containers because heat increases the release of BPA in the plastic.
According to the Wall Street Journal, a major source of concern is the amount of BPA that could be in premixed liquid formulas for infants. BPA isn't found in powdered formula containers, said the FDA.
Although the main route by which BPA gets into the body is via food packaging and containers, it can also come in via drinking water and dental sealants, and because it is so ubiquitous (it is one the world's highest production volume chemicals and the demand is growing) it is also present in household dust and can get in via the skin and by being inhaled, said the authors of the new JAMA study.
Source: FDA, AP, WSJ, MNT archives.
Written by: Catharine Paddock, PhD
Copyright: Medical News Today
Not to be reproduced without permission of Medical News Today
MLA
15 Feb. 2012. <http://www.medicalnewstoday.com/articles/121837.php>
APA
http://www.medicalnewstoday.com/articles/121837.php.
Please note: If no author information is provided, the source is cited instead.
|
Rate this article: (Hover over the stars then click to rate) |
Patient / Public: |
or |
Health Professional: |
Visitor Opinions In Chronological Order (1)
Studies
posted by Colleen on 18 Sep 2008 at 9:37 amOMG. Another wait and see if it truly is bad for us. The vast majority of studies, suggesting it is OK for consumers, have been paid for by the plastics industry! Do your research people! We have access to so much information. Health is at stake. They all have an agenda. Money is the bottom line. Why are we seeing so much more cancer in younger people. Could part of the problem be that we grew up with the chemicals, additives, toxins, plastics, and our parents (60-70 yr olds) did not. The things the FDA deemed OK at certain levels. WHAT LEVELS ARE WE TALKING ABOUT? We all have different life styles. What levels are safe for 1 yr old Jimmy, the puberty age, 25 yr olds, or the pregnant woman?
Add Your Opinion
Please note that we publish your name, but we do not publish your email address. It is only used to let you know when your message is published. We do not use it for any other purpose. Please see our privacy policy for more information.
If you write about specific medications or operations, please do not name health care professionals by name.
All opinions are moderated before being included (to stop spam)
Contact Our News Editors
For any corrections of factual information, or to contact the editors please use our feedback form.
![]()
Please send any medical news or health news press releases to:
Note: Any medical information published on this website is not intended as a substitute for informed medical advice and you should not take any action before consulting with a health care professional. For more information, please read our terms and conditions.






