Search is Powered by Google
Public Health News

North East Building Firm Fined £6,000 For Failing To Ensure Workers' Safety At Height, UK

Main Category: Public Health
Article Date: 10 Oct 2008 - 1:00 PDT

email icon email to a friend   printer icon printer friendly   write icon view / write opinions   rate icon rate article
Current Article Ratings:

Patient / Public:not yet rated

Health Professional:not yet rated

Article Opinions: 0 posts

The Health and Safety Executive (HSE) today warned employers that they face prosecution if they fail to ensure the safety of people working at height.

The warning came after a North East roofing company, was fined £6,000 and ordered to pay costs of £17,028 at Sunderland Magistrates' Court after it failed to ensure that roofing work was carried out safely on an industrial building on Wearside.

Abercorn Homes Ltd, of Hobson Industrial Estate, Burnopfield, Tyne and Wear, was found guilty of breaching regulations 4 (1) (c) and 6 (3) of the Work at Height Regulations 2005, following an investigation by the HSE. The charges relate to work carried out on 3 November 2006, on an industrial roof at Rainton Meadows Arena at Rainton Bridge.

HSE Inspector Michael Brown said:

The warning came after a North East roofing company, was fined £6,000 and ordered to pay costs of £17,028 at Sunderland Magistrates' Court after it failed to ensure that roofing work was carried out safely on an industrial building on Wearside.

Abercorn Homes Ltd, of Hobson Industrial Estate, Burnopfield, Tyne and Wear, was found guilty of breaching regulations 4 (1) (c) and 6 (3) of the Work at Height Regulations 2005, following an investigation by the HSE. The charges relate to work carried out on 3 November 2006, on an industrial roof at Rainton Meadows Arena at Rainton Bridge.

HSE Inspector Michael Brown said:

"Three workers were observed by a HSE inspector carrying out additional cladding work on the roof of the building, about four metres from ground level. Edge protection had not been provided for the eaves of the building, which were approximately 50 metres long, although it had been provided on the gable ends of the building. In addition, a scissor lift had been inappropriately used to gain access to the roof and modified to carry materials.

The risks from work at height on construction sites are well known within the industry and HSE statistics show that for the year 2006/07 falls from height accounted for 23 deaths. Abercorn Homes Ltd, who was the roofing contractor for the site, should have been well versed in, and implemented, the necessary safety requirements. The management and control of work at height fell well below those standards expected.

I would like to remind those who manage or control work at height of the importance of ensuring that the work is properly planned by a competent person, appropriately supervised and carried out in a safe manner." Three workers were observed by a HSE inspector carrying out additional cladding work on the roof of the building, about four metres from ground level. Edge protection had not been provided for the eaves of the building, which were approximately 50 metres long, although it had been provided on the gable ends of the building. In addition, a scissor lift had been inappropriately used to gain access to the roof and modified to carry materials.

The risks from work at height on construction sites are well known within the industry and HSE statistics show that for the year 2006/07 falls from height accounted for 23 deaths. Abercorn Homes Ltd, who was the roofing contractor for the site, should have been well versed in, and implemented, the necessary safety requirements. The management and control of work at height fell well below those standards expected.

I would like to remind those who manage or control work at height of the importance of ensuring that the work is properly planned by a competent person, appropriately supervised and carried out in a safe manner."

Notes

1 Regulation 4 (1) (c) of the Work at Height Regulations 2005 states: "Every employer shall ensure that work at height is carried out in a manner which is so far as is reasonably practicable safe."

2. Regulation 6 (3) of the Regulations states:"Where work is carried out at height, every employer shall take suitable and sufficient measures to prevent, so far as is reasonably practicable, any person falling a distance liable to cause personal injury."

3. The maximum fine for a breach of the regulations in the Magistrates' Court is a fine of £5000.

4. More information on the Work at Height Regulations is available at http://www.hse.gov.uk/falls/regulations.htm.

HSE




Customized Homepage Weekly Newsletters Daily News Alerts
Home About Us News Licensing Free Website Feeds Free Tools & Content Links Tell a Friend Accessibility Help / FAQ Article Submission Contact Us
Urology
ADHD Autism Diabetes

add medical news today to your facebook

medical news gadget

Add to Google


developers
website gadget code
website news code
medical news rss feed links


customize your homepage


These are the most read articles from this news category for the last 6 months:
Top Article Star
Dangers Of Cod Liver Oil
12 Nov 2008
Today, sixteen well-known experts, including professors Walter Willett and Ed Giovannucci of Harvard, Dr. John Hathcock of the Council for Responsible Nutrition, and Professor Reinhold Vieth of the University of Toronto...


First  Aid Kit image First Aid Kit

While home first aid kits can be purchased at most retailers, it may be wiser to create your own tailored to your family's needs. Here, the essentials and recommendations of a home first aid kit are explained...

Fine China image Fine China

Many people collect and display fine china, without realizing eating off them can be hazardous. With the lead content in vintage china posing health risks to adults and children alike, the use of these pieces as tableware should be limited...

View more videos...