Vigorous Exercise Protects Against Breast Cancer
Featured ArticleMain Category: Breast Cancer
Also Included In: Sports Medicine / Fitness; Women's Health / Gynecology; Obesity / Weight Loss / Fitness
Article Date: 03 Nov 2008 - 0:00 PDT
| Patient / Public: | ![]() |
4.18 (11 votes) |
| Healthcare Prof: | ![]() |
2.67 (3 votes) |
| Article Opinions: | 1 posts |
New research from the US suggests that vigorous exercise cuts the risk of breast cancer in post-menopausal women and is particularly effective for women who are not overweight.
The study was the work of researchers at the National Cancer Institute and is published in the 31 October issue of the journal Breast Cancer Research.
For the study the investigators examined data on over 32,000 women enrolled in the Breast Cancer Detection Demonstration Project Follow-up Study. This included responses to a questionnaire about their physical activity (including everyday tasks like housework, work related activity and leisure activity) over 12 months before baseline, after which incidence of post-menopausal breast cancer and deaths were monitored. The investigators then performed statistical tests to estimate the relative risk of post-menopausal breast cancer linked to physical activity.
The results showed that:
- There were a total of 269,792 person-years of follow-up from 1987 to 1998.
- During that time, 1,506 new incident cases of postmenopausal breast cancer were reported.
- There was a weak inverse relationship between total physical activity and postmenopausal breast cancer (after adjusting for other possible breast cancer risk factors).
- Vigorous activity accounted for practically all of this trend.
- The inverse link to vigorous activity was limited to lean women (BMI less than 25 kg/m2).
- In contrast, no link to vigorous activity was found for overweight and obese women (BMI of 25 kg/m2 and over).
- Non-vigorous activity was not linked to breast cancer at all.
- These results were independent of hormone receptor subtype.
"Our findings suggest that physical activity acts through underlying biological mechanisms that are independent of body weight control," wrote the researchers. Thus it was the exercise itself that was beneficial, regardless of whether it resulted in weight loss, they argued.
The researchers rated the following activities as "vigorous": heavy housework like scrubbing floors and washing windows (vacuuming was rated as non-vigorous); garden digging (as opposed to general gardening); chopping wood; strenuous sports and exercise, including running, fast jogging and aerobics (as opposed to walking, golf or light jogging); cycling on hills (as opposed to on the flat); and fast dancing.
"Prospective study of physical activity and risk of postmenopausal breast cancer.
Michael F Leitzmann, Steven C Moore, Tricia M Peters, James V Lacey, Arthur Schatzkin, Catherine Schairer, Loiuse A Brinton, and Demetrius Albanes.
Breast Cancer Research, 2008, 10:R92, Published 31 October 2008.
doi:10.1186/bcr2190
Click here for Abstract.
Sources: Journal Article.
Written by: Catharine Paddock, PhD.
Copyright: Medical News Today
Not to be reproduced without permission of Medical News Today
MLA
10 Feb. 2012. <http://www.medicalnewstoday.com/articles/127874.php>
APA
http://www.medicalnewstoday.com/articles/127874.php.
Please note: If no author information is provided, the source is cited instead.
|
Rate this article: (Hover over the stars then click to rate) |
Patient / Public: |
or |
Health Professional: |
Visitor Opinions In Chronological Order (1)
To the people that don’t think these “pink promotions” are doing any good for breast cancer:
posted by eugenescott33 on 7 Oct 2010 at 4:45 pmTo the people that don’t think these “pink promotions” are doing any good for breast cancer: I agree with you that breast cancer is being employed as a cheap means of gaining sympathy and is used by most companies as nothing more than a marketing strategy for their other crap products (a lot like selling promotional items at a loss, except most places are actually making profits off of these “charity” promotions).
I used to denounce these companies, too, but the reality is that most people have no interest/desire to care about breast cancer research unless they or someone close to them has suffered from it. I’d probably be guilty of the same thing… the only reason I even found this page is because I was searching for info about complications I had from a removal of a malignant node (and yes, men can have breast cancer, too - you can see for yourself what happened… bad breast augmentation pics, but make sure you didn’t just eat). As shady as these companies are, with most giving maybe a penny to actual breast cancer research off of every pink nic nac they sell, the reality is that their “contribution,” as disingenuous as it is, is better than nothing at all. If it wasn’t for greedy, shady corporations trying to exploit ppl’s emotions, I don’t see any other way that we can raise awareness and garner support for this cause. And let’s face it, interest groups don’t work when the only money coming in is from the small group of ppl that are actually motivated enough to join. People just simply don’t care unless it’s affecting them directly…
Add Your Opinion
Please note that we publish your name, but we do not publish your email address. It is only used to let you know when your message is published. We do not use it for any other purpose. Please see our privacy policy for more information.
If you write about specific medications or operations, please do not name health care professionals by name.
All opinions are moderated before being included (to stop spam)
Contact Our News Editors
For any corrections of factual information, or to contact the editors please use our feedback form.
![]()
Please send any medical news or health news press releases to:
Note: Any medical information published on this website is not intended as a substitute for informed medical advice and you should not take any action before consulting with a health care professional. For more information, please read our terms and conditions.





