Patients Should Not Lose Access To NHS If They Top Up Their Care - The King's Fund, UK
Main Category: Public HealthAlso Included In: Health Insurance / Medical Insurance
Article Date: 04 Nov 2008 - 4:00 PST
Speaking ahead of an expected government announcement about the conclusions of a review of the use of additional private drugs for NHS care, Niall Dickson, chief executive of The King's Fund said:
'The current situation is simply untenable. Policy should be changed so that, in certain circumstances, patients will not lose their right to access the rest of their care on the NHS if they pay privately for drugs that have been rejected on cost-effective grounds.
'There are areas of the NHS where there is already inconsistency over patient charging, such as eye and dental care, and current rules don't make it clear to patients why these top-ups are allowed but others, such as the use of non-NICE approved drugs, are not. Variation between local NHS decisions as to whether to allow patients to have non-NICE approved drugs is unclear and confusing and leads to patients feeling like victims of a lottery.
'It must be clear to patients, clinicians and managers the circumstances in which top-ups are allowed so everyone understands the rules and patients should have access to information about the costs, benefits and limitations of any drug they are thinking of purchasing.
'Patients who decide to pay for an additional drug should also pay for any extra costs to the NHS of administering that drug.
'We will have to wait to see the details of the government's announcement on Tuesday but it's important that people realise it won't solve all the problems to do with patients wanting the NHS to provide them with drugs, treatments or devices that are considered too expensive to be freely available. And even if the government does decide to allow top-ups inevitably some patients will be able to afford to pay and some will not.
'But what we can say is that this review has already been helpful in highlighting the need to look at the value that we put on drugs and care at the end of life and how we assess the cost effectiveness of treatments for very rare diseases.'
The King's Fund seeks to understand how the health system in England can be improved. Using that insight, we help shape policy, transform services and bring about behaviour change. Our work includes research, analysis, developing leaders and improving services. We also offer a wide range of resources to help everyone working in health share knowledge, learning and ideas.
The King's Fund
|
Please rate this article: (Hover over the stars then click to rate) |
Patient / Public: |
or |
Health Professional: |
Any medical information published on this website is not intended as a substitute for informed medical advice and you should not take any action before consulting with a health care professional. For more information, please read our terms and conditions.
Contact Our News Editors
For any corrections of factual information, or to contact the editors please use our feedback form.
![]()
Please send any medical news or health news press releases to:
| Back to top | Back to front page | List of All Medical Articles |
| Privacy Policy | Terms and Conditions | © 2009 MediLexicon International Ltd |



