Bone Marrow Toxicity In Advanced Lung Cancer May Be Reduced By Proton Therapy And Concurrent Chemotherapy

Main Category: Lung Cancer
Also Included In: Radiology / Nuclear Medicine;  Blood / Hematology;  Clinical Trials / Drug Trials
Article Date: 14 Nov 2008 - 3:00 PDT

email to a friend   printer friendly   view / write opinions   rate article

Patients treated for locally advanced non-small cell lung cancer who receive chemotherapy and proton beam therapy have fewer instances of bone marrow toxicity than patients who receive the standard treatment of intensity-modulated radiation (IMRT) and concurrent chemotherapy, according to researchers from The University of Texas M. D. Anderson Cancer Center.

The findings were reported at the 2008 Chicago Multidisciplinary Symposium in Thoracic Oncology, sponsored by ASTRO, ASCO, IASLC and the University of Chicago. It is the first study to examine the benefits of proton beam therapy and concurrent chemotherapy in advanced lung cancer patients.

The conventional treatment for locally advanced non-small cell lung cancer is intensity-modulated radiation with concurrent chemotherapy. The majority of lung cancer patients who receive this therapy are at risk of bone marrow toxicity, a debilitating side effect of treatment that further weakens a patient's already vulnerable immune system. The occurrence of bone marrow toxicity - the reduction of hemoglobin, neutrophils, lymphocytes and white blood cells - results in a patient's inability to withstand aggressive treatment, rendering it less effective. This condition often leads to infection, bleeding, fatigue and even death.

Researchers compared bone marrow toxicity levels in 142 patients treated for lung cancer between January 2003 and June 2008. All of the patients received chemotherapy; IMRT was administered to 75, while 67 were treated with proton beam therapy. After 17 months, patients treated with concurrent chemotherapy and proton beam therapy experienced significantly less reduction in hemoglobin (0% vs. 4%), neutrophils (4% vs. 17%) and lymphocytes (54% vs. 87%) when compared to those treated with CT and IMRT. These differences remained when the gross tumor volume was considered.

"Our goal is to find the best way to treat the cancer without further weakening the patient," said Ritsuko Komaki, M.D., professor in M. D. Anderson's Division of Radiation Oncology and lead author on the study. "Standard care currently provides a 25 percent five-year survival rate. But as a physician, I have seen how treatment affects patients' overall health: they are tired, suffer from night sweats, are prone to infection and have to compromise their treatment. With proton therapy, we may now have an option that lessens this toxicity so that treatment dosage can be maximized."

Lung cancer is the leading cause of cancer death in the United States, according to the American Cancer Society. In 2008, approximately 215,000 people will be diagnosed with lung cancer and approximately 114,000 people will die from the disease.

Proton beam therapy ionizes cancer cells by stripping away their electrons, consequently mutating the cells' DNA so that they cannot divide and proliferate. Protons are significantly heavier than X-rays, allowing them to travel in a straight path through the body without being deflected. While radiation therapy destroys both the tumor and the healthy tissue surrounding it, proton therapy can target a tumor precisely with little damage to normal tissue.

"This study suggests that proton beam therapy may benefit patients who are extremely vulnerable to bone marrow toxicity," said James Cox, M.D., professor and head of the Division of Radiation Oncology and the study's senior author. "Proton therapy may promise safer and more effective treatment for children, whose bone marrow is still developing, and elderly patients who are more prone to complications and cannot withstand aggressive treatment."

M. D. Anderson is currently working with Massachusetts General Hospital to enroll patients in an NCI-approved randomized prospective clinical trial to confirm these initial findings.

----------------------------
Article adapted by Medical News Today from original press release.
----------------------------

In addition to Komaki and Cox, M. D. Anderson researchers contributing to this study include Samir V. Sejpal, M.D., Xiong Wei M.D., Pamela Allen Ph.D., Richard Amos M.Sc., Radhe Mohan, Ph.D., Joe Y. Chang M.D., Zhongxing Liao, M.D., and Lei Dong, Ph.D., from the Departments of Radiation Oncology, Radiation Physics, and Biostatistics and Applied Mathematics.

Also at the conference, Cox presented his study on proton beam therapy and its effects on tissue toxicity.

About M. D. Anderson

The University of Texas M. D. Anderson Cancer Center in Houston ranks as one of the world's most respected centers focused on cancer patient care, research, education and prevention. M. D. Anderson is one of only 41 Comprehensive Cancer Centers designated by the National Cancer Institute. For four of the past six years, M. D. Anderson has ranked No. 1 in cancer care in "America's Best Hospitals," a survey published annually in U.S. News and World Report.

Source: Laura Sussman
University of Texas M. D. Anderson Cancer Center