Search is Powered by Google
Genetics News

New York Times Series Examines Use Of Genetic Tests To Determine Whether Drugs Will Benefit Individuals

Main Category: Genetics
Also Included In: Primary Care / General Practice
Article Date: 06 Jan 2009 - 2:00 PST

email icon email to a friend   printer icon printer friendly   write icon view / write opinions   rate icon rate article
Current Article Ratings:

Patient / Public:not yet rated

Health Professional:not yet rated

Article Opinions: 0 posts

The New York Times in an installment of its "The Evidence Gap" series last week examined how "so much hope is riding on the promise of 'personalized medicine,' in which genetic screening and other tests give doctors more evidence for tailoring treatments to patients, potentially improving care and saving money." According to the Times, experts believe that "most drugs, whatever the disease, work for only about half the people who take them." While many policy experts are urging comparative effectiveness studies for different treatments, such studies "tend to be 'one size fits all,' with the winning treatment recommended for everybody," the Times reports. Personalized medicine would allow physicians to determine which drug is best for a particular patient, rather than "continuing to treat everyone the same in hopes of benefiting the fortunate few," the Times reports.

According to the Times, "For all the potential, experts see some formidable obstacles on the path to the promised land of personalized medicine." Gregory Downing, leader of HHS' efforts to promote personalized health care, said, "It's going to take 20 to 30 years for all this to fall into place." Factors that could limit implementation of individual effectiveness testing include drugmakers' reluctance to support something that would limit use of their products and insurers' reluctance to pay for the tests, which can cost "up to a few thousand dollars," according to the Times. In addition, genetic test makers face the "major obstacle" of "proving their products are accurate and useful," the Times reports. Unlike drugs, there is no standard process for evaluating genetic tests, many of which can be marketed by laboratories not approved by FDA. The Times also examined efforts by drugmakers to regulate the use of such tests (Pollack, New York Times, 12/30/08).

Opinion Piece
Personalized medicine "can help direct the right treatment to the right patient" and result in "vast" improvements in health care and cost savings, HHS Secretary Mike Leavitt and Raju Kucherlapati, a professor of genetics and medicine at Harvard Medical School, write in a Boston Globe opinion piece. They state that personalized medicine has "the potential to transform the effectiveness of medical care in the immediate future."

Leavitt and Kucherlapati write that "our conception of disease needs to be more precise in order to better individualize care," adding that the "explosive growth of scientific discoveries at the molecular level, accompanied by advances in technology and analytical capabilities, bring the promise of greater precision and effectiveness in medicine." They continue, "Over time, we should be able to prescribe medicines with foreknowledge as to their effectiveness for individual patients and disease subtypes" and "increased knowledge of genetics and molecular biology should also enable us to detect disease before symptoms appear, making possible earlier treatment and even pre-emption of the disease."

They write that personalized medicine "cannot be implemented if it is going to result in a great increase in health care costs." However, "the practice of personalized medicine can be an important part of achieving higher value in health care" because "[m]ore accurate dosing, enabled by a relatively low-cost genetic test, might save as much as $1 billion per year while delivering better quality care and better health."

Leavitt and Kucherlapati conclude, "We have an important opportunity to improve health and improve value in health care. Let us make personalized medicine an explicit goal of health care reform" (Kucherlapati/Leavitt, Boston Globe, 12/26/08).

Reprinted with kind permission from http://www.kaisernetwork.org. You can view the entire Kaiser Daily Health Policy Report, search the archives, or sign up for email delivery at http://www.kaisernetwork.org/dailyreports/healthpolicy. The Kaiser Daily Health Policy Report is published for kaisernetwork.org, a free service of The Henry J. Kaiser Family Foundation.

© 2008 Advisory Board Company and Kaiser Family Foundation. All rights reserved.




Personalized Homepage Weekly Newsletters Daily News Alerts
Opioid Induced Constipation ADHD Anxiety Asthma Autism Cancer Diabetes Lung Cancer Lupus Medicare / Medicaid Obesity and BMI Pancreatic Cancer Stem Cells All 'What Is...' Articles All 'How To...' Articles

Ophthalmology Urology
About Us News Licensing Free Website Feeds Free Tools & Content Tell a Friend Accessibility Help / FAQ Article Submission Links Contact Us

add medical news today to your facebook
medical news gadget

Swine Flu Image

Swine Flu Updates

- Latest Swine Flu News
- What is Swine Flu?
- Map Of H1N1 Outbreaks
- Swine Flu - Top 20 FAQ
- Daily Email News Alerts
Stick with Medical News Today for the latest news updates on swine flu.


These are the most read articles from this news category for the last 6 months:
Top Article Star
Mother Gives Birth To Twins With Different Fathers, US
18 May 2009
11-month old Dallas-born twins Justin and Jordan have different fathers, a phenomenon known as heteropaternal superfecundation that is so rare there are only a handful of documented cases in the world...


Naps Aren't Just for Kids Anymore
Naps Aren't Just for Kids Anymore

A power nap may be the answer to the mid-day slump. Research suggests naps improve productivity, mental function, and motor function. They also may improve cardiovascular health.

more videos are available in our health videos section.