Abstinence-Only Sex Education Programs Costly, Ineffective, Editorial Says
Main Category: Women's Health / GynecologyAlso Included In: Sexual Health / STDs; Pediatrics / Children's Health
Article Date: 14 Jan 2009 - 4:00 PST
| Patient / Public: | ![]() |
5 (1 votes) |
| Health Professional: | ![]() |
5 (2 votes) |
| Article Opinions: | 0 posts |
President-elect Barack Obama could fulfill his pledge "to weed out inefficient and bloated federal programs" and also "save $200 million a year for the taxpayers" by eliminating federal funding for abstinence-only sex education programs, a Philadelphia Daily News editorial states. It continues that "the U.S. government has continued to pour money into abstinence-only education, a total of $1.5 billion so far," even though "[o]nly the people who collect a paycheck from them say that they work."
A study released last month found that teenagers who took "'virginity pledges' were just as likely as their peers to have premarital sex, but they were less likely to use condoms or other forms of birth control," the editorial states. According to the editorial, the findings indicate that abstinence-only programs "don't lead to more sexual abstinence -- and actually may lead to more unsafe sex, which means more unwanted pregnancies and more sexually transmitted [infections]." It notes that another report recently released by CDC found that teen birth rates have increased in 26 states after a 14-year decline.
According to the editorial, the "best method for preventing teen pregnancy is no mystery." In Western Europe, which "figured it out long ago," implementing comprehensive sex education and increasing access to contraception "has resulted in significantly lower teen pregnancy rates, abortions" and STIs, the editorial states. It continues that the organization Advocates for Youth has stated that if the U.S. reduced teen birth rates to that of the Netherlands, "it would mean 617,000 fewer pregnancies here and a first-year saving of $542 million." The editorial concludes, "Abstinence-only programs are the definition of 'waste, fraud and abuse.' It's time for Congress to stop those government checks" (Philadelphia Daily News, 1/12).
Reprinted with kind permission from http://www.nationalpartnership.org. You can view the entire Daily Women's Health Policy Report, search the archives, or sign up for email delivery here. The Daily Women's Health Policy Report is a free service of the National Partnership for Women & Families, published by The Advisory Board Company.
© 2008 The Advisory Board Company. All rights reserved.
|
Please rate this article: (Hover over the stars then click to rate) |
Patient / Public: |
or |
Health Professional: |
Any medical information published on this website is not intended as a substitute for informed medical advice and you should not take any action before consulting with a health care professional. For more information, please read our terms and conditions.
Contact Our News Editors
For any corrections of factual information, or to contact the editors please use our feedback form.
![]()
Please send any medical news or health news press releases to:
| Back to top | Back to front page | List of All Medical Articles |
| Privacy Policy | Terms and Conditions | © 2009 MediLexicon International Ltd |



