Lapatinib Could Be Beneficial In Treating Patients With Aggressive Inflammatory Breast Cancer
Editor's ChoiceMain Category: Breast Cancer
Also Included In: Cancer / Oncology
Article Date: 27 Apr 2009 - 2:00 PDT
| Patient / Public: | ![]() |
5 (1 votes) |
| Healthcare Prof: | ![]() |
3 (1 votes) |
| Article Opinions: | 1 posts |
An article published online First and in the June edition of The lancet Oncology reports the findings of a phase II study on inflammatory breast cancer, an aggressive form of the disease representing up to one tenth of malignant breast cancer cases. Dr Stephen Johnston, Royal Marsden Hospital, London, UK, and Dr Bella Kaufman, The Chaim Sheba Medical Center, Tel Hashomer, Israel, and colleagues discuss how lapatinib may be beneficial in the treatment of this form of cancer.
In inflammatory breast cancer, the protein epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) implicated in the signaling pathways leading to cell growth is manifested much more than in other less aggressive cancers. This disease makes up one to six percent of all invasive breast tumors in Western Europe and the USA and five to ten percent in North Africa and Arabian countries. The clinical symptoms are: rapid onset of swelling, redness of the breast skin, fluid under the skin of more than two thirds of the breast resulting in a bumpy appearance, painfulness, hardening and warming of the breast.
Lapatinib hinders tumor growth because it is an oral inhibitor of HER2. Options are limited for patients with resistance to conventional anthracycline or taxane and trastuzumab treatment. The study included 126 patients receiving a daily dose of lapatinib (1,500 mg). Every four weeks, skin disease was evaluated and cancer evolution (local and secondary) was assessed using standard criteria.
Findings showed that none of the patients had an absolute response to the treatment but 39 percent (49 patients) had a partial response with a 50 percent healing in extent of skin disease from baseline. The average progression-free survival was of fifteen weeks, with an average duration of response of twenty one weeks. Six months later, 22 percent of patients were still progression-free. The probability of response to lapatinib was not altered by prior treatment with trastuzumab. The general average of survival was accounted for four groups of patients:
• 33 patients who responded to lapatinib and had previous treatment with trastuzumab. Median survival: 18.4 months.
• 15 patients who responded to lapatinib and had no previous treatment with trastuzumab. Median survival: 14.0 months.
• 61 patients unresponsive to lapatinib and previous treatment with trastuzumab. Median survival: 8.4 months.
• 16 patients unresponsive to lapatinib with no previous trastuzumab treatment. Median survival: 8.2 months.
Undesirable events were frequent since 92 percent of patients experienced at least one. Although the majority was not considered linked to lapatinib, 32 percent of patients suffered serious adverse events: eight of them experienced shortness of breath, and six of them had fluid around the lungs. There were five deaths from adverse events that were possibly treatment related.
The researchers point out: "Patients who responded to treatment with lapatinib had a longer median overall survival than did those patients who did not respond, irrespective of previous exposure to trastuzumab. Patients exposed to previous trastuzumab treatment who experienced a response to lapatinib had the longest median overall survival. This finding confirms the clinical benefit of targeted therapy in these patients."
They write in conclusion: "Lapatinib monotherapy is potentially clinically effective in heavily pretreated patients with inflammatory breast cancer with HER2+ tumours. The objective response rate noted...coupled with the median duration of response and median overall survival supports a role for lapatinib in these patients."
http://www.thelancet.com
Written by Stephanie Brunner (B.A.)
Copyright: Medical News Today
Not to be reproduced without permission of Medical News Today
MLA
12 Feb. 2012. <http://www.medicalnewstoday.com/articles/147655.php>
APA
http://www.medicalnewstoday.com/articles/147655.php.
Please note: If no author information is provided, the source is cited instead.
|
Rate this article: (Hover over the stars then click to rate) |
Patient / Public: |
or |
Health Professional: |
Visitor Opinions In Chronological Order (1)
Lapatinib Could Be Beneficial In Treating Patients With Aggressive Inflammatory Breast Cancer
posted by Gregory D. Pawelski on 27 Apr 2009 at 9:10 amDirect anti-tumor and anti-vascular effects were studied of Tykerb in fresh biopsy specimens of breast cancer and presented at the American Society of Clinical Oncology Breast Cancer Symposium on September 5, 2008.
While the other clinically-available 'nib' drugs have been shown to have anti-vascular activity, anti-vascular activity of Tykerb has not been previously reported.
Angiogenesis studies are limited by the clinical relevance of laboratory model systems. They don't do "real world" studies under "real world" conditions. Patient outcomes need to be reported in real-time, so patients and cancer physicians can learn immediately if and how patients are benefiting from new drug therapies.
Cell culture detection of microvascular cell death in clinical specimens of human neoplasms and peripheral blood can identify the activity of both single drugs and combinations of drugs at the level of individual patients with individual cancers. It works by measuring drug effects (real-time) upon endothelial cells which make up blood vessels.
Conclusions of the study had shown that Tykerb has antivascular activity superior to that of Nexavar. Avastin + Tykerb may be the first clinically-exploitable antivascular drug combination. High dose, intermittent 'bolus' schedules of Tykerb to coincide with Avastin administration may be clinically advantageous, even in HER2-negative tumors.
The system utilized for the study was a functional profiling assay, which may be used to individualize antivascular therapy. It can be adapted for simple, inexpensive and sensitive/specific detection of tissue and circulating microvascular cells in a variety of neoplastic and non-neoplastic conditions, for drug development, and individualized cancer treatment.
It can accurately sort drugs into categories of above average probability of providing clinical benefit on one hand and below average probability of providing clinical benefit on the other hand, based both on tumor response and patient survival.
Add Your Opinion
Please note that we publish your name, but we do not publish your email address. It is only used to let you know when your message is published. We do not use it for any other purpose. Please see our privacy policy for more information.
If you write about specific medications or operations, please do not name health care professionals by name.
All opinions are moderated before being included (to stop spam)
Contact Our News Editors
For any corrections of factual information, or to contact the editors please use our feedback form.
![]()
Please send any medical news or health news press releases to:
Note: Any medical information published on this website is not intended as a substitute for informed medical advice and you should not take any action before consulting with a health care professional. For more information, please read our terms and conditions.





