Sebelius Reinvigorating Debate Over Catholic Church's Attempts To 'Dictate Officeholders' Actions,' Opinion Piece Says
Main Category: AbortionArticle Date: 29 Apr 2009 - 6:00 PDT
| Patient / Public: | ![]() |
5 (1 votes) |
| Health Professional: | ![]() |
5 (2 votes) |
| Article Opinions: | 0 posts |
Kansas Gov. Kathleen Sebelius' (D) veto of the latest measure (S.B. 218) in "an unending series of restrictive abortion bills" in the state "guaranteed" that her confirmation as HHS secretary "would become a battleground in the increasingly nasty campaign being waged against officeholders who are both Catholic and Democratic," Los Angeles Times columnist Tim Rutten writes in an opinion piece. Rutten notes that Kansas City Archbishop Joseph Naumann, after Sebelius vetoed another antiabortion-rights measure earlier this year, "forbade" the governor from receiving Communion unless she changes her views.
Republicans will continue to "make as much out of this confirmation as possible," as conservatives have been working "for years to pry Catholic voters out of the Democratic Party," Rutten says. He adds that for conservatives, "the Holy Grail of political advantage is a long-sought clerical edict that would prohibit any Catholic officeholder who ever has cast a pro-choice vote from receiving Communion." According to Rutten, conservatives would like to extend this edict to any Catholic who has voted for a candidate who supports abortion rights, thus forcing Catholic Democrats to "choose between their party and their church." According to Rutten, "most bishops ... have avoided such an either/or moment." However, "time is gradually changing the character of the American Catholic hierarchy," and "a new, more brittle and ultramontane group of bishops appears willing to elevate the abortion issue over all others." Rutten continues that the new archbishop of Washington, D.C., Donald Wuerl, and Arlington, Va., Bishop Paul Loverde "have said they expect Sebelius to obey her local bishop's order if she moves into their sees." Rutten concludes that Wuerl and Loverde "might want to consider where they'll find themselves if even their own co-religionists come to believe they're in the business of dictating officeholders' actions rather than forming consciences" (Rutten, Los Angeles Times, 4/25).
Reprinted with kind permission from http://www.nationalpartnership.org. You can view the entire Daily Women's Health Policy Report, search the archives, or sign up for email delivery here. The Daily Women's Health Policy Report is a free service of the National Partnership for Women & Families, published by The Advisory Board Company.
© 2009 The Advisory Board Company. All rights reserved.
|
Please rate this article: (Hover over the stars then click to rate) |
Patient / Public: |
or |
Health Professional: |
Any medical information published on this website is not intended as a substitute for informed medical advice and you should not take any action before consulting with a health care professional. For more information, please read our terms and conditions.
Contact Our News Editors
For any corrections of factual information, or to contact the editors please use our feedback form.
![]()
Please send any medical news or health news press releases to:
| Back to top | Back to front page | List of All Medical Articles |
| Privacy Policy | Terms and Conditions | © 2009 MediLexicon International Ltd |





