Senate Ends Debate On Hamilton, Could Vote To Confirm This Week
Main Category: AbortionAlso Included In: Litigation / Medical Malpractice
Article Date: 19 Nov 2009 - 5:00 PST
The Senate on Tuesday voted 70-29 to allow debate on federal appeals court nominee David Hamilton, ending a GOP filibuster and setting up a final confirmation vote that could occur this week, Roll Call reports (Brady, Roll Call, 11/17).
Hamilton's confirmation has been stalled since June, when the Senate Judiciary Committee gave him a favorable recommendation to the Senate, the AP/Boston Globe reports. Conservatives then mounted a campaign against Hamilton, criticizing some of his past rulings on issues such as abortion rights. As a federal district judge, Hamilton struck down part of an Indiana law requiring women to make two trips to a clinic before obtaining abortion services, calling the law an undue burden on women's constitutional rights.
According to the AP/Globe, Tuesday's vote "warned Republicans that with only 40 senators, they are too outnumbered to prevent Obama from making major inroads into a judiciary that was populated over eight years with conservative judges chosen by" former President George W. Bush.
Hamilton's confirmation would not shift the ideological bent of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the 7th Circuit, which receives cases from Illinois, Indiana and Wisconsin. Seven of the court's judges were nominated by Republican presidents, and Hamilton would be the fourth chosen by a Democrat (Margasak, AP/Boston Globe, 11/18).
Ten Republican senators voted to end debate and advance Hamilton's nomination. Sen. Jeff Sessions (R-Ala.), the ranking member of the Judiciary Committee, led the fight against Hamilton. Sessions said that his opposition was in part because of past Democratic filibusters of Bush nominees. "I believe this side cannot acquiesce into a philosophy that says Democratic presidents can get their judges confirmed with 50 votes, but if a Republican president … has to have 60 votes," he said. Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid (D-Nev.) said that Republican opposition to Hamilton had "nothing to do with Judge Hamilton himself and everything to do with partisanship" (Vadala, CQ Today, 11/17).
Hamilton, who has served as a federal judge for 15 years, enjoys bipartisan backing, receiving strong support from his home state Sen. Richard Lugar (R-Ind.), as well as the endorsement of the conservative Federalist Society (Women's Health Policy Report, 11/17).
Reprinted with kind permission from http://www.nationalpartnership.org. You can view the entire Daily Women's Health Policy Report, search the archives, or sign up for email delivery here. The Daily Women's Health Policy Report is a free service of the National Partnership for Women & Families, published by The Advisory Board Company.
© 2009 The Advisory Board Company. All rights reserved.
|
Please rate this article: (Hover over the stars then click to rate) |
Patient / Public: |
or |
Health Professional: |
Any medical information published on this website is not intended as a substitute for informed medical advice and you should not take any action before consulting with a health care professional. For more information, please read our terms and conditions.
Contact Our News Editors
For any corrections of factual information, or to contact the editors please use our feedback form.
![]()
Please send any medical news or health news press releases to:
| Back to top | Back to front page | List of All Medical Articles |
| Privacy Policy | Terms and Conditions | © 2010 MediLexicon International Ltd |



