Senate HELP Committee To Examine New Mammogram Recommendations

email to a friend

printer friendly

view / write opinions

Current Article Ratings:

Patient / Public:
Health Professional:
Article Opinions:	0 posts

On Tuesday, a bipartisan group of 22 senators sent a letter to HELP Committee Chair Tom Harkin (D-Iowa) asking that the committee assess the recommendations and try to dispel any confusion over when women should be screened for breast cancer. "These recommendations, which have been widely criticized by patients and doctors alike, could prove devastating for women at risk for breast cancer," the letter said. It continued, "The American people deserve to know more about how this task force came to its controversial findings" (Norman, CQ HealthBeat, 11/24).

Sen. Lisa Murkowski (R-Alaska) wrote the letter. She said, "These recommendations have caused great confusion among women," adding, "Women are seeking answers and are asking their elected representatives whether the task force's finding will put them at increased risk for this deadly disease" (Brady, Roll Call, 11/24). Murkowski continued, "And to compound that confusion, [HHS] Secretary Kathleen Sebelius said afterwards that women in their 40s should continue to get mammograms." Sebelius said that the recommendations will not alter insurance coverage for mammograms under federal programs. The American Cancer Society also continues to recommend that women begin annual mammograms at age 40 (CQ HealthBeat, 11/24).

Controversy Shows Challenges of Controlling Health Costs, Post Columnist Says

The "uproar" surrounding the USPSTF guidelines "is proof of the blindingly obvious: Health care reform that actually controls costs -- rather than just pretending to do so -- would be virtually impossible to achieve," Washington Post columnist Eugene Robinson writes. None of the current versions of health reform legislation in Congress "even tries to address a central factor that sends costs spiraling out of control, which is that each of us wants the best shot at a long, healthy life that medical science can offer," he continues. The "honest solution is a word that cannot be spoken: rationing," he argues, adding, "Our system already rations health care based on the individual's ability to pay." Likewise, insurance companies "ration some tests and procedures based on age, risk factors and what often seems like whim," Robinson writes. Such "ad hoc rationing doesn't work very well," he says, concluding that "nothing in any of the reform bills even tries to address the basic consensus that makes spending continue to rise: Put a lid on everybody else's costs, but don't touch mine" (Robinson, Washington Post, 11/24).

Reprinted with kind permission from http://www.nationalpartnership.org. You can view the entire Daily Women's Health Policy Report, search the archives, or sign up for email delivery here. The Daily Women's Health Policy Report is a free service of the National Partnership for Women & Families, published by The Advisory Board Company.

© 2009 The Advisory Board Company. All rights reserved.