Search is Powered by Google
Follow us on:
Follow our health news on Twitter
Follow Our News on Facebook
Personalization
login | register
Abortion News

Focus On The Family Buys Super Bowl Pregame Ads

Main Category: Abortion
Also Included In: Women's Health / Gynecology;  Pregnancy / Obstetrics
Article Date: 08 Feb 2010 - 0:00 PST

email icon email to a friend   printer icon printer friendly   write icon view / write opinions
Current Article Ratings:

Patient / Public:5 stars

5 (1 votes)

Health Professional:5 stars

5 (1 votes)

Article Opinions: 0 posts

Focus on the Family plans to air a second television advertisement four times during the Super Bowl pregame show that will also feature former University of Florida quarterback Tim Tebow and his mother, Pam Tebow, USA Today reports (Horovitz, USA Today, 2/5).

The organization is sponsoring a yet-to-be-seen in-game commercial featuring the Tebows discussing Pam's personal story of contracting amoebic dysentery while pregnant with Tim and ignoring doctors' recommendations to have an abortion ( Women's Health Policy Report, 2/1). According to Focus on the Family CEO Jim Daly, the original advertisement was rejected after CBS executives said that Pam Tebow's line, "Both of our lives were at risk," was "too much" (USA Today, 2/5).

Opposition Continues

The Tebow spot has "been the subject of one of the most intense tugs-of-war over an ad in many years," with abortion-rights supporters and opponents both up in arms, the New York Times reports. In response to the Tebow ad, Planned Parenthood Federation of America released its own online ad featuring Olympic gold medalist Al Joyner and former NFL player Sean James supporting a woman's right to make her own "decision about her health and her family" (Elliott, New York Times, 2/5).

The New York-based Women's Media Center -- which is leading a coalition of abortion-rights organizations -- has called on CBS to pull the ad. On Wednesday, Women's Media Center urged supporters to call NFL Commissioner Roger Goodell. According to Women's Media Center President Jehmu Greene, the ad "has no place in the biggest national sports event of the year -- an event meant to bring people together" (Kadaba, Philadelphia Inquirer, 2/5).

Editorials, Opinion Pieces Comment on Ad

~ Los Angeles Times: Women's Media Center's call for CBS to cancel the Tebow ad is "a shame, and CBS is to be congratulated for standing up to the pressure," a Los Angeles Times editorial states. "We're solidly for abortion rights, but the campaign against the ad is a misguided attempt at censorship," according to the editorial. It adds that CBS' recent reconsideration of its policy on advocacy ads is "a sensible move," as long as "the network applies this policy fairly to groups across the political spectrum" (Los Angeles Times, 2/5).

~ Katha Pollitt, The Nation: "[P]art of me was thrilled to learn that Focus on the Family was paying" $2.5 million on a thirty-second Super Bowl ad because "[e]very dollar [the group] spends messaging the fans is a dollar not available to pay the electricity bill or keep staff on payroll," Pollitt, an author, writes in an opinion piece. She says it is "maddening that the people who want to take away women's right to choose have annexed 'choice' to their own cause," noting that if the law required women to continue troubled pregnancies "there would be no heroism in doing so." Pollitt continues, "In retrospect it was probably a mistake for pro-choice and feminist organizations to demand that CBS cancel the ad." However, the "trouble is, much of the abortion-rights case is about averting damage, and it's harder to tell those stories," she says (Pollitt, The Nation, 2/4).

~ Lisa Miller, Newsweek: The controversy over the Tebow ad is "a case in point" of how "Americans like values, but they don't know which values they like best," Newsweek religion editor Miller writes in an opinion piece. She also questions how abortion-related ads are different from product ads, saying, "What's the difference … between 'selling' an ideology on TV and selling a hamburger?" According to Miller, "In a working democracy, with a capitalist economy and protected free speech, there is none." She writes, "Isn't promoting one idea over another the foundation of free debate -- and, more crassly, the business of advertising?" (Miller, Newsweek, 2/4).

Reprinted with kind permission from http://www.nationalpartnership.org. You can view the entire Daily Women's Health Policy Report, search the archives, or sign up for email delivery here. The Daily Women's Health Policy Report is a free service of the National Partnership for Women & Families, published by The Advisory Board Company.

© 2010 The Advisory Board Company. All rights reserved.






Personalized Homepage Weekly Newsletters Daily News Alerts
Hemophilia Opioid Induced Constipation Pneumococcal Disease ADHD Anxiety Asthma Atrial Fibrillation Autism Cancer Diabetes Lung Cancer Lupus Medicare / Medicaid Obesity and BMI Pancreatic Cancer Stem Cells All 'What Is...' Articles

Ophthalmology Urology
About Us News Licensing Free Website Feeds Free Tools & Content Tell a Friend Accessibility Help / FAQ Article Submission Links Contact Us

add medical news today to your facebook
medical news gadget

Forum Icon

Abortion Forum

Discuss issues relating to abortion in our new forum.

Visit the abortion forum


These are the most read articles from this news category for the last 6 months:
Top Article Star
China's One-Child Policy Leads To Coerced Abortion, Sterilization, Columnist Parker Writes
13 Nov 2009
Although "no one supports forced abortion," coerced abortions and involuntary sterilizations "are commonplace in China" under the country's one-child policy, syndicated columnist Kathleen Parker writes in the Washington Post...


What You Need to Know about Multi-Vitamins
What You Need to Know about Multi-Vitamins

A multi-vitamin can be a good supplement, but it can't replace a healthy diet. It's important to make sure your multi-vitamin covers the major bases.

more videos are available in our health videos section.