Vitamin D Is Effective In Reducing Frequency Of Many Diseases And Cost Of Medical Care
Editor's ChoiceMain Category: Nutrition / Diet
Also Included In: Public Health; Bones / Orthopedics
Article Date: 11 Aug 2010 - 0:00 PDT
| Patient / Public: | ![]() |
4.65 (17 votes) |
| Healthcare Prof: | ![]() |
4.13 (8 votes) |
| Article Opinions: | 5 posts |
Anthony Norman, a leading international expert in vitamin D, proposes worldwide policy changes regarding people's vitamin D daily intake amount in order to maximize the vitamin's contribution to reducing the frequency of many diseases, including childhood rickets, adult osteomalacia, cancer, autoimmune type-1 diabetes, hypertension, cardiovascular disease, obesity and muscle weakness.
"A reduction in the frequency of these diseases would increase the quality and longevity of life and significantly reduce the cost of medical care worldwide," said Norman, a distinguished professor emeritus of biochemistry and biomedical sciences at the University of California, Riverside. "It is high time that worldwide vitamin D nutritional policy, now at a crossroads, reflects current scientific knowledge about the vitamin's many benefits and develops a sound vision for the future."
Currently, the recommended daily intake of vitamin D in the United States is 200 international units (IU) for people up to 50 years old; 400 IU for people 51 to 70 years old; and 600 IU for people over 70 years old. Today there is a wide consensus among scientists that the relative daily intake of vitamin D should be increased to 2,000 to 4,000 IU for most adults.
"Worldwide public health is best served by a recommendation of higher daily intakes of vitamin D," Norman said. "Currently, more than half the world's population gets insufficient amounts of this vitamin. At present about half of elderly North Americans and Western Europeans and probably also of the rest of the world are not receiving enough vitamin D to maintain healthy bone."
Reporting in a review paper in the July 28, 2010, issue of Experimental Biology and Medicine, Norman and Roger Bouillon of the Laboratory of Experimental Medicine and Endocrinology at the Katholieke Universiteit Leuven, Belgium, warn that if the current nutritional guidelines for vitamin D remain unchanged, rickets and osteomalacia, which could be easily prevented, will continue to occur.
They add that if the present guidelines for vitamin D intake are strictly implemented and applied worldwide to pregnant or lactating women, newborns and children, the occurrence of rickets in infants could be effectively eradicated.
Norman, the first author of the review paper, and Bouillon note that if the daily dietary intake of vitamin D is increased by 600-1000 IU in all adults above their present supply, it would bring beneficial effects on bone health in the elderly and on all major human diseases (e.g., cancer, cardiovascular, metabolic and immune diseases).
The researchers add, however, that if the vitamin D dietary intake were increased to 2000 IU per day and even more for subgroups of the world population with the poorest vitamin D status, it could favorably impact multiple sclerosis, type-1 diabetes, tuberculosis, metabolic syndrome, cardiovascular risk factors and most cancers.
About vitamin D:
Also known as the "sunshine vitamin," vitamin D was discovered 90 years ago as a dietary agent that prevented the bone disease rickets.
Exposure to the sun is the body's natural way of producing the vitamin. Skin exposed to solar UVB radiation can produce significant quantities of vitamin D. But this vitamin D synthesis is reliably available year-round only at latitudes between 40 degrees north and 40 degrees south. A combination of sunshine, food, supplements, and possibly even limited tanning exposure can raise the daily intake of the vitamin to 2000 IU.
Vitamin D is itself biologically inert. Its biological effects result only after it is metabolized first in the liver and then in the kidney - a process that converts the vitamin into a steroid hormone.
The best sources of unfortified foods naturally containing vitamin D are animal products and fatty fish and liver extracts like salmon or sardines and cod liver oil. Vitamin D-fortified food sources in the United States (the fortification levels aim at about 400 IU per day) include milk and milk products, orange juice, breakfast cereals and bars, grain products, pastas, infant formulas and margarines.
Vitamin D excess can cause health problems such as hypercalcemia, vomiting, thirst and tissue damage. The precise upper limit for daily vitamin D intake is not well defined.
Source: University of California - Riverside
Copyright: Medical News Today
Not to be reproduced without permission of Medical News Today
MLA
12 Feb. 2012. <http://www.medicalnewstoday.com/articles/197356.php>
APA
http://www.medicalnewstoday.com/articles/197356.php.
Please note: If no author information is provided, the source is cited instead.
|
Rate this article: (Hover over the stars then click to rate) |
Patient / Public: |
or |
Health Professional: |
Visitor Opinions In Chronological Order (5)
vitamins
posted by kathryn on 11 Aug 2010 at 12:53 amThere are many vitamin supplements that prevent and cure many illnesses avoiding the use of drugs with all there nasty side effects.
Vitamin D excess
posted by Pete on 11 Aug 2010 at 1:39 amAlthough "The precise upper limit for daily vitamin D intake is not well defined." it is known to be much higher than 4000IU a day. There are no reported cases of toxicity up to 10,000IU a day. The body will make somewhere between 10,000 and 25,000IU a day from full sun exposure, so it is unlikely that 4000IU is excessive. If you are dying of thirst it is best not to be put off drinking by the risk of drowning.
And the response of the health insurance "industry" to this news?
posted by azure on 24 Aug 2010 at 2:21 pmI guess this means that all the health insurers in the US--because of their so often expressed desire to keep medical costs down--will immediately announce that all policies/plans (including individual plans) throughout the US will now PAY for the entire cost of: annual tests for Vitamin D levels in all insured persons and Vit D3 supplements of good quality, if the tests indicate they're needed to increase or maintain health Vit D levels.
Right?
Who's holding their breath in anticipation of this happening?
Not me.
Not Vitamin D, it is Vitamin D3
posted by jcmjx on 24 Aug 2010 at 7:32 pmIt's Vitamin D3, not Vitamin D that makes the difference. I see this reported incorrectly all over the major media websites. Get it right!
Stunning the Human Body Needs Vitamin D
posted by josh on 24 Aug 2010 at 9:47 pmI do believe we have all made this a bit too complicated. All the studies of late always confirm or suggest what we have known all along. A balanced diet(food pyramid), moderate exercise(like only 30 min a day), adequate sleep, fulfilling social life, and a little common sense go a long way to longevity.
Lets say scientist, through years of research, are able to perfect vitamin D dosage for your exzact genetic makeup. You getting optimal vitamin D levels will be of little consequence if your obese, use tobacco, drive like a maniac, and have unprotected sex.
Sunscreen, don't get me started on sunscreen. Say your spending all day at the beech, by all means put on some good sunscreen. Just going to the market for some bread, skip the sunblock for the love of Pete. It sometimes seems like the whole of western civilization has gone a bit wonky.
Add Your Opinion
Please note that we publish your name, but we do not publish your email address. It is only used to let you know when your message is published. We do not use it for any other purpose. Please see our privacy policy for more information.
If you write about specific medications or operations, please do not name health care professionals by name.
All opinions are moderated before being included (to stop spam)
Contact Our News Editors
For any corrections of factual information, or to contact the editors please use our feedback form.
![]()
Please send any medical news or health news press releases to:
Note: Any medical information published on this website is not intended as a substitute for informed medical advice and you should not take any action before consulting with a health care professional. For more information, please read our terms and conditions.







