Electronic Cigarette Distributors Warned By FDA Regarding Unsubstantiated Claims
Editor's ChoiceMain Category: Smoking / Quit Smoking
Also Included In: Regulatory Affairs / Drug Approvals; Medical Devices / Diagnostics
Article Date: 09 Sep 2010 - 13:00 PST
| Patient / Public: | ![]() |
2.5 (2 votes) |
| Healthcare Prof: | ![]() |
5 (1 votes) |
| Article Opinions: | 2 posts |
Warning letters were sent to five different electronic cigarette distributors by the FDA (Food and Drug Administration) for making unsubstantiated claims, as well as poor manufacturing practices. The FDA also informed the Electronic Cigarette Association that it means to regulate electronic cigarettes and related products "in a manner consistent with its mission of protecting the public health."
A drug product is required to demonstrate its safety to the FDA, it also needs to prove it is effective for its intended use. Manufacturing methods have to be shown to be adequate so that the strength, quality and purity of the product is preserved, the Agency added.
In the letter to the Electronic Cigarette Association, the FDA wrote:
FDA invites electronic cigarette firms to work in cooperation with the agency toward the goal of assuring that electronic cigarettes sold in the United States are lawfully marketed.
Electronic cigarettes are subject to FDA regulation as drugs, the Agency has determined. It explains in its warning letters that under FDCA (Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act), if a company makes a claim to treat or mitigate a disease, such as nicotine addiction, it is required to prove its safety and effectiveness.
All five electronic cigarette distributing companies make this claim, but with no relevant evidence that their products help users give up smoking.
Warning letters were sent to the following companies:
- E-CigaretteDirect LLC
- Ruyan America Inc.
- Gamucci America (Smokey Bayou Inc.)
- E-Cig Technology Inc.
- Johnson's Creek Enterprises LLC.
- E-Cig Technology sells drugs in unapproved liquid forms, such as tadalafil, the active ingredient for the erectile dysfunction drug Cyalis, as well as rimonabant, a weight loss drug which has not been approved in the USA yet. Rimonabant is the active ingredient in the following brand named weight loss drugs, Acomplia, Bethin, Monaslim, Remonabent, Riobant, Slimona, Rimoslim, Zimulti, and Riomont. These liquid medications are designed to refill e-cigarette cartridges to that they may be inhaled through vapour.
- Johnson Creek Enterprises, distributor of Smoke Juice, a liquid solution used to refill empty e-cigarette cartridges, is cited by the FDA for several faults in its manufacturing process, including not establishing quality control and testing procedures required under the FDCA.
What are e-cigarettes?
E-cigarettes, also known as personal vaporizers, or electronic cigarettes, are battery-powered devices that look like cigarettes which provide inhaled doses of nicotine in a vaporized solution - some may also provide non-nicotine vaporized solutions. They are sold as alternatives to smoked tobacco products, such as pipes, cigars and cigarettes.E-cigarettes are said to provide a flavor and physical sensation similar to what a tobacco smoker experiences, but without the smoke or combustion (you don't light it up).
Some e-cigarettes look just like cigarettes, while others look like ballpoint pens, and even pipes.
The majority of e-cigarettes are reusable and have replaceable and refillable parts. Some of them are disposable.
E-cigarettes in Europe - electronic cigarettes were brought to Europe in April 2006, and officially launched in Austria. Estimates place the number of regular e-cigarette users in Europe at over half-a-million.
E-cigarettes in the USA - classed as a drug by the FDA, and subject to market approval before sale under the FDCA. In January 2010 a federal judge overturned the FDA classification. However, an appeals court overruled the judge's classification in March 2010. Several online e-cigarette companies have emerged online in America.
Sources: FDA, Wikipedia.
Written by Christian Nordqvist
Copyright: Medical News Today
Not to be reproduced without permission of Medical News Today
MLA
3 Feb. 2012. <http://www.medicalnewstoday.com/articles/200572.php>
APA
http://www.medicalnewstoday.com/articles/200572.php.
Please note: If no author information is provided, the source is cited instead.
|
Rate this article: (Hover over the stars then click to rate) |
Patient / Public: |
or |
Health Professional: |
Visitor Opinions In Chronological Order (2)
curious
posted by diane on 10 Sep 2010 at 7:36 amI am not a smoker and work very hard at living healthy and organic. D/t my healthy life style, I am free of all health problems. With that said, I’m curious as to a pattern I’ve taken notice of many years back, with a trend of consistency. Natural cures in any form are not advertised for specific reasons - FDA. No profit for them, so they debunk such products as unaffected cures. The FDA, a multi-billion dollar profit organization controls what people believe about what will cure or help improve their health. They FDA say, “Only drugs cure disease!” Drugs = investment; for them, and all the shareholders, and many more. Drugs can leave the country for increase profit sharing, yet none can enter. Why? Marketing/ Business 101; increased competition decreases profit. Eliminate competition to fix the problem. Simple.
Why do we not see elaborate, sophisticated, and calculated media and TV advertisement for “Natural Cures?” FDA. Yet, you can’t turn on your TV without the FDA, along with their partner in crime, The pharmaceutical industry; pushing dope to us through comical and yet sophisticated advertisement. We laugh at these ads, yet, they work. Be it or not, it’s the best form of profit. Do you think they will be affected financially if the “E-cigarette” actually worked? YES! So, why are they citing them? No drug is in their product other than a product already existing - nicotine. With that said, and biting, my tongue to say no more, possibly two things will happen with the “E-cigarette.”
The manufacturers will be forced by the FDA to share in the profit, in doing so, they will then return to the media, telling the people - “We have reviewed and back this product.” If this happens, adjustments to the product must be made to encourage a continued addiction, not cure!
I don’t see that happening, so this will become like all other unsupported helpful products, it’ll slowly and quietly disappear from our market and move out side the country.
Think about it, does health insurance cover health club memberships, organic or natural anything to increase wellness - other than OT and r/t therapies? If true health was where the money was the people would be healthier with increase knowledge about natural and less knowledge about synthetic compound toxic chemicals that destroy health faster than cocaine. I sometimes wonder if the FDA had the ability to control marijuana , cocaine and other illegal drugs we would see them advertised as a must have to improve whatever they came up with; of course, quickly and comically known deadly side affects stated at the end of the AD. People laugh, but the request the meds from doctors, doctors fill the order, and the profit continues. So sad.
Sounds about right
posted by Kate on 10 Sep 2010 at 9:06 amThe FDA have been suppressing smokeless cigarettes since at least 1987 with over regulation - making them unprofitable to bring to consumers.
Add Your Opinion
Please note that we publish your name, but we do not publish your email address. It is only used to let you know when your message is published. We do not use it for any other purpose. Please see our privacy policy for more information.
If you write about specific medications or operations, please do not name health care professionals by name.
All opinions are moderated before being included (to stop spam)
Contact Our News Editors
For any corrections of factual information, or to contact the editors please use our feedback form.
![]()
Please send any medical news or health news press releases to:
Note: Any medical information published on this website is not intended as a substitute for informed medical advice and you should not take any action before consulting with a health care professional. For more information, please read our terms and conditions.






