Alcohol Is Most Harmful Drug, Followed By Heroin And Crack

Editor's Choice
Main Category: Alcohol / Addiction / Illegal Drugs
Also Included In: Public Health
Article Date: 01 Nov 2010 - 9:00 PDT

Current ratings for:
'Alcohol Is Most Harmful Drug, Followed By Heroin And Crack'

Patient / Public:4 and a half stars

4.34 (79 votes)

Healthcare Prof:4 stars

3.84 (44 votes)

Article opinions: 21 posts

Alcohol is the most damaging drug to the drinker and others overall, heroin and crack are the second and third most harmful, Professor David Nutt and colleagues wrote in the medical journal The Lancet today. When all factors related to self harm and harm to others are considered, alcohol comes out top. The authors explain that drugs, including tobacco products and alcohol are major contributors to damage to individuals as well as society as a whole.

The harms that are caused by drugs need to be comprehensively assessed so that policy makers can be properly advised regarding health, social care and policing, the authors write; not an easy undertaking because drugs can cause damage in so many different ways.

Professor Nutt and colleagues had previously tried to do this (Lancet 2007) by asking experts to give each drug a score according to nine criteria of harm, which included the drug's intrinsic harms as well as the social and health care burdens. The report triggered widespread debate and interest. However, there were doubts regarding the differential weights of each criterion used.

In this latest report, Nutt and colleagues say they have addressed these concerns by using a multicriteria decision analysis (MCDA) when reviewing drug harms. MCDA technologies have been effectively used to help decision making in areas where factors, features and characteristics are complex and often conflicting, as may be the case when deciding policy on nuclear waste disposal.

Nine criteria related to harm to an individual from a drug, while six looked at harm to others - both in the United Kingdom and other countries. The harms were gathered into five subgroups that covered social, psychological and physical harms. Scoring was done with points up to 100, with 100 being the most damaging and zero no damage. Weighting then compared the impact a score of 100 had on all the other criteria, thus identifying the 100-points-scoring-drugs which were more harmful than other 100-points-scoring-drugs.

The authors wrote (in explanation of their model):

In scaling of the drugs, care is needed to ensure that each successive point on the scale represents equal increments of harm. Thus, if a drug is scored at 50, then it should be half as harmful as the drug that scored 100.


The nine harm-to-self categories of a drug were: The harm-to-others categories of a drug were: With the MCDA modeling method, alcohol came top as the most harmful drug overall. Below are some highlights of their findings: Not only is alcohol the most harmful drug overall, the authors write, but is nearly three times as harmful as tobacco or cocaine, according to the new ISCD MCDA modeling.

Mephedrone, which was recently a legal-high in the UK before it was re-categorized as a Class B controlled drug this year. Alcohol is over five-times as harmful as mephedrone.

Ecstasy is just one-eighth as harmful as alcohol, despite all its media attention and public concerns.

Professor Nutt said (direct quote, not found in article):

What a new classification system might look like would depend on what set of harms-to self or others-you are trying to reduce. But if you take overall harm, then alcohol, heroin and crack are clearly more harmful than all others so perhaps drugs with a score of 40 or more could be class A; 39 to 20 class B; 19-10 class C and 10 or under class D.


The MCDA procedure is an effective and powerful means for dealing with the complex issues related to drug misuse, the authors wrote.

They said:

The issue of the weightings is crucial since they affect the overall scores. The weighting process is necessarily based on judgment, so it is best done by a group of experts working to consensus.

(conclusion) Our findings lend support to previous work in the UK and the Netherlands, confirming that the present drug classification systems have little relation to the evidence of harm. They also accord with the conclusions of previous expert reports that aggressively targeting alcohol harms is a valid and necessary public health strategy.


In an associated Comment, also in The Lancet, Dr. Jan Van Amsterdam, National Institute for Public Health and the Environment, Netherlands, and Dr Wim van den Brink, Amsterdam Institute for Addiction Research, Academic Medical Center, University of Amsterdam, Netherlands, wrote:

A major point not addressed in the study, because it was outside their scope, is polydrug use, which is highly prevalent among recreational drug users. Notably, the combined use of alcohol with other drugs often leads in a synergistic way to very serious adverse effects.


They also explain that consuming combinations of these drugs can significantly alter their adverse events and harm impacts. For example, magic mushrooms on their own have a very low incidence of adverse events, but individuals who consume mushrooms as well as alcohol have a much higher risk of accidents that result in death. Other examples of combinations mentioned include alcohol with cocaine, leading to cocaethylene - an extremely toxic compound, or alcohol with cannabis which can seriously affect an individual's ability to drive properly.

The Comment authors concluded:

Nutt and colleagues' ranking of the licit and illicit drugs is certainly not definitive, because the pattern of recreational drug use is dynamic: the popularity and availability of the drugs, and the pattern of polydrug use, might change within a decade. The ranking of the drugs. should therefore be repeated at least every 5-10 years. Finally, for the discussion about drug classification, it is intriguing to note that the two legal drugs assessed-alcohol and tobacco-score in the upper segment of the ranking scale, indicating that legal drugs cause at least as much harm as do illegal substances.


"Drug harms in the UK: a multicriteria decision analysis"
Prof David J Nutt FMedSci a Corresponding AuthorEmail Address, Leslie A King PhD b, Lawrence D Phillips PhD
The Lancet, Early Online Publication, 1 November 2010
doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(10)61462-6

Written by Christian Nordqvist
Copyright: Medical News Today
Not to be reproduced without permission of Medical News Today

Visit our alcohol / addiction / illegal drugs section for the latest news on this subject.
There are no references listed for this article.
Please use one of the following formats to cite this article in your essay, paper or report:

MLA
Christian Nordqvist. "Alcohol Is Most Harmful Drug, Followed By Heroin And Crack." Medical News Today. MediLexicon, Intl., 1 Nov. 2010. Web.
16 May. 2012. <http://www.medicalnewstoday.com/articles/206300.php>

APA
Christian Nordqvist. (2010, November 1). "Alcohol Is Most Harmful Drug, Followed By Heroin And Crack." Medical News Today. Retrieved from
http://www.medicalnewstoday.com/articles/206300.php.

Please note: If no author information is provided, the source is cited instead.



Visitor Opinions (latest shown first)

Total 21 opinions, latest 20 shown. For all opinions, click through to the full thread.

Misleading comment @ Jon Krueger

posted by Jintao on 9 Jan 2012 at 5:29 am

You make some interesting propositions there. You're severely inflating the dangers of tobacco there - which I agree, tobacco is a very dangerous carcinogen and cause of many self as well as social harm.

However you constant downplay of alcohol's damaging effects in comparison to tobacco is scientifically flawed as well as highly peronsally biased.

You are attributing a well known consequence of tobacco use, such as lung cancer, to tobacco use and saying how dangerous it is but its not caused by alcohol. Surely, lung cancer is a dangerous disease, but you cannot use the destructive effects of one drug to say that drug is any more or less dangerous than another simply because that drug does not cause this consequence. Your logic is severely flawed there.

Furthermore, some of your claims that you make, such as millions of kids growing up without mom or dad due to tobacco and not alcohol, is completely ridiculous. Please back any of these atrocious claims with some proper solid evidence - do you have any idea how destructive socia effects alcohol can have on a family? You obviously arent a very scientifically oriented person, but you should still think about the ridiculous associations you make before posting.

| post followup | alert a moderator |


Why all the fuss?

posted by darB on 21 Mar 2011 at 9:16 am

I don't see the intent of this article as being "anti-alcohol" as some comments suggest, I find it interesting. I would guess that alcohol is the number 1 substance on the list based solely on the fact that it is legal (in most places)and it's use is widely socially acceptable. Suffice it to say that drug abuse (to include alcohol) isn't goin anywhere. As long as the human being has the desire to alter consciousness, like it or not, there will always be a market for substances that fill the role. Some will overindulge and succumb to dependency and addiction, others will not. Intoxication has been a human pursuit for thousands of years and that won't change anytime soon.

| post followup | alert a moderator |


This seems mostly on the mark to me

posted by Karen Eliot on 16 Jan 2011 at 11:40 am

It's a testimony to the safety of MDMA -- which is now a ghetto drug like crack, alcohol, and heroin -- that it only rates a 9 despite years of propaganda to the contrary and too many things being called MDMA overdoses that weren't MDMA-related at all.

As for the commenter who posted about tobacco -- yes tobacco kills more people. But it doesn't cause the assaults, rapes, impaired driving and other socially destructive behaviors that alcohol does, or the hangovers that reduce productivity and the systemic damage that does the same. Tobacco causes health problems but generally not till much later in life. When was the last time you heard of someone dying from "binge smoking"?

| post followup | alert a moderator |


Prevalence

posted by JLD on 2 Dec 2010 at 4:32 pm

OK the study isn't perfect in its weightings. I too think that tobacco is more harmful (I lost both parents to it) than is reflected here - but it is a great leap forward. Yes drugs like crack and ice can have a rapid disastrous impact but how many people have screwed up their lives because of booze compared to all the other drugs put together? I don't think prohibition of any substance is the answer.

Prohibition = profit for organised crime and the permanent criminalisation of our youth. With the thousands of poor/homeless/mentally ill people I have seen over the years the substance they have been consuming is of a secondary concern to their REASON for consuming that substance. If one substance isn't available another one will replace it. Any policy that helps us focus on that rather than upon the legality of use is superior. I for one am sick of the sensationalist nonsense and the petty political hypocrisy that abounds around this issue.

| post followup | alert a moderator |


Alcohol, the socio-medical problem no. 1

posted by Hermann T. Meyer on 2 Nov 2010 at 3:41 am

For many decades alcohol has been called the socio-medical problem No.1. This study is just an additional piece of proof. But a very valuable one, as it comes in a time when governments are not willing to implement the new alcohol strategy of the World Health Organization (May 2010), even if they signed it, because they are under permanent pressure of the global alcohol industry. This sort of corruption costs human tragedies and lives every day and the people is not able to protest as it is not informed.

| post followup | alert a moderator |


Great information!

posted by Claudia on 1 Nov 2010 at 4:32 pm

We don't generally think about alcohol use in "overall" terms, so this study is great! Alcohol use & abuse doesn't only affect the drinker, but everyone else. People are generally too selfish to think about alcohol on such balanced terms. They only think about themselves, "oh, it doesn't do AS MUCH damage to me," etc. Grow out of your self-centered universe peoples! Alcohol destroys everyone, kids, parents, families, etc., and it has for centuries.

Great information. Bravo for the courage in presenting such unpopular findings.

| post followup | alert a moderator |


Noddys

posted by David Howell on 1 Nov 2010 at 2:36 pm

The government will not accept that alcohol is more dangerous than heroin because of the tax revenue from alcohol also smoking cigarettes is also more dangerous than heroin but there again the tax revenues on tobacco is millions of pounds If the governments could morally tax heroin or cannabis it would be sold freely in shops

| post followup | alert a moderator |


What about fetal toxicity?

posted by questioning on 1 Nov 2010 at 2:34 pm

"The harm-to-others categories of a drug were:
* crime, * decline in community cohesion, * economic cost, * environmental damage, * family conflict, * international damage "

What about harm to a fetus that the mother plans to carry to term?

| post followup | alert a moderator |


Cannabis

posted by john denton on 1 Nov 2010 at 2:23 pm

Cannabis is 20, speed 23, and LSD is 7 you say?

Hardly. But perhaps just in time to scare the voters on prop 19

| post followup | alert a moderator |


BHB

posted by Luke M on 1 Nov 2010 at 1:41 pm

BHB? I think you mean GHB. Hahahaha oh wow.

Interesting study though.

| post followup | alert a moderator |


Government Has Own Agenda Outside of Reality

posted by Gabriel Spaulding on 1 Nov 2010 at 12:11 pm

This just goes to show that the law is not a barometer for morality. The law as it exists today classifies drugs in almost the completely reverse order of what harm they may cause, either to the individual or to others. Why is alcohol legal? Because it is the primary drug of choice for middle to old aged, predominantly white men who run the country, and the people who most commonly vote for them. Thus, alcohol is advertised everywhere and there is a licensed drug dealer on practically every corner (at least in MIlwaukee, WI). I find it sadly amusing that Wisconsin passed an anti-smoking law that applies to bars and taverns, which is like saying: "We don't want those sixth most dangerous drugs (according to the study) interfering with the popular and profitable business of selling the number one most dangerous drug in the world!" This is devoid of logic, or reason, and is completely disconnected from the reality of life as we currently know it. The government has its own agenda, well outside of what we know about ourselves and the workings of the world. It is not a valid source of sanity, much less morality. This study serves as just another example of how inadequate and unqualified our government is (whether in the U.S. or the U.K.) to provide for its people in an honest and truthful way.

| post followup | alert a moderator |


M.A. [private citizen]

posted by ellis jard on 1 Nov 2010 at 11:56 am

All the more reason for this society to get serious about helping people who want serious help with their alcohol addiction rather than being afflicted with alcoholic drunkalogues amateurs anononymous. Would you go to a self-taught, self-opinionated barely pased high school sort for major brain surgery? I know that sounds loutish, but that's the way most alcohol treatment is delivered in USA. Even this past week's mea culpa in Psych Central from an MD that "we doctors have been late to the party" had the odor of "who, well, yes, weren't we just too busy with our too superior selves?" about it and "Yes, we really ought to consider alcohol addiction as a serious matter, shame on us for neglecting you people." How many years will it take for the "illumination" to get through R&D and into the classroom and into actual practice? I'm sure I'll be dead by then. What a waste. Meanwhile how many people who could have been of worth, should have been help have died owing to social prejudices and just plain lack of any sort of rational treatment?

| post followup | alert a moderator |


The Truth Emerges

posted by Gary Young on 1 Nov 2010 at 11:09 am

I applaud Professor Nutt for sticking his neck again, to try to rebalance the skewed and hypocritical views of drugs in the western world. I reckon if alcohol, tobacco and coffee was discovered today - all would be illegal drugs or available only on prescription. Today - we need bold moves by governments and leaders so we take fresh look at all areas of drugs law and enforcement based on scientific evidence rather that historical status quo.

| post followup | alert a moderator |


Practical vs. Puritanical

posted by Sammi on 1 Nov 2010 at 10:49 am

What is needed is a more realistic attitude toward social alcohol use instead of wallowing in the kind of Puritanical fear that studies like this one promote. Cheerz IntelliShot is a new functional shot/mixer than helps the body to more efficiently process alcohol's most toxic metabolite, acetaldehyde. ATH is an extremely toxic carcinogen created as the liver breaks down alcohol that has been linked in numerous studies to everything from hangover, to liver disease, cancers, osteoporosis, Alzheimer's, and even dependency--in SOCIAL drinkers. Social alcohol use (and abuse) is never going away regardless of the amount of proselytizing and finger wagging. A little more awareness and promotion of responsibility and less fear mongering would be a tremendous leap forward. Christopher Hitchens said, "Alcohol is happiness, and people cannot be counted upon to pursue happiness in moderation." If Hitch had access to something like IntelliShot years ago he might not be dying of his self professed enjoyable vices.

| post followup | alert a moderator |


What do these ratings actually tell us?

posted by Shawn Finkler on 1 Nov 2010 at 10:40 am

The reason people drink alcohol more than the rest of these drugs, is largely because it is the least expensive and most legal think to imbibe in. These types of studies become self-fulfilling prophecies. If you made alcohol illegal and legalized something else, that would surely become the "most destructive". Is this another prohibition rally or something? Or a justification for legalization of another drug? It is all rubbish, and tells us what we already know.

| post followup | alert a moderator |


Illegality related adverse effects

posted by Dick Rickerson on 1 Nov 2010 at 10:07 am

We often think of the effects of illegality when we think of an illegal drug - contaminants in it and crime to pay for it. I'd like to see a study where the effect of illegality was accounted for and presented separately.

Alcohol, on the other hand, fills ERs every weekend due to bar fights caused by the drug itself.

But then, alcohol prevents strokes, when consumed regularly in small quantities.

So prohibition is no solution, it makes drugs more harmful and traffickers rich. Controlled consumption and a stigmatizing bingeing are the only way out.
Let's start with increased punishment for alcohol-related violence, as opposed to the current unaccountability rules. Everyone is sober at the moment they decide to go get drunk.

| post followup | alert a moderator |


I don't buy it.

posted by Richard on 1 Nov 2010 at 9:56 am

Alcohol, though damaging over time, and certainly is the cause of many life destroying incidents is not as destructive as "hard"er drugs. Apparently the progenitors of this study have never seen a healthy person decay into a walking husk in a matter of months due to heroin or cocaine or crack addiction.

Those arbitrary rating scales may say one thing, but reality and experience tell the rest of us another. I'm all for Science, but I'm also for it being done correctly. Don't believe everything you read.

| post followup | alert a moderator |


Weed worse than ecstasy and ketamine

posted by Travis Wheeler on 1 Nov 2010 at 9:41 am

On what planet would you tell someone that ecstasy, a combo of speed and lsd, and ketamine a vetrinary drug, are less dangerous than weed. Wonderfully valuable research you have here.

| post followup | alert a moderator |


none

posted by Jon Krueger on 1 Nov 2010 at 9:37 am

Tobacco kills several times more Americans than alcohol.

Tobacco kills 20 times more Americans than all illegal drugs combined.

Defining "harm" in a way that trivializes death seems to me to have completely lost perspective.

One billion people alive today will be killed by tobacco. Alcohol doesn't even come close.

But I'll allow as how sublethal effects can be counted too.

Fine: according to CDC, tobacco products are not only the single most preventable cause of death in America, they're also the single most preventable cause of disease and disability. Not alcohol.

50,000 kids are growing up in America right now without a Mom or Dad because of tobacco. Not alcohol.

8.6 million persons in the United States are living with a major disease caused by tobacco product (CDC numbers, 2000 MMWR). Not alcohol.

140 million Americans are regularly exposed to secondhand smoke, a known carcinogen and lung and heart pathogen. Tobacco. Not alcohol.

I'm not seeing where any of this got incorporated into the "harm" formula here.

| post followup | alert a moderator |


Alcohol - growing problem

posted by Steve Clements on 1 Nov 2010 at 9:35 am

I'm old enough to remember the time when alcohol was available ONLY from a pub or from an off-licence and when licencing hours were far shorter than they are now. Revert back to the same controls of alcohol sales and the problem will reduce markedly - the problem is that the government does not WANT to reduce alcohol consumption. They get a LOT of revenue from alcohol sales, making the UK government the richest pusher in the country! The problem is easily solved, it just needs the political will.

| post followup | alert a moderator |


Latest 20 opinions shown. For all opinions, click through to the full thread.

Add Your Opinion On This Article

'Alcohol Is Most Harmful Drug, Followed By Heroin And Crack'

Please note that we publish your name, but we do not publish your email address. It is only used to let you know when your message is published. We do not use it for any other purpose. Please see our privacy policy for more information.

If you write about specific medications or operations, please do not name health care professionals by name.

All opinions are moderated before being included (to stop spam)

Your Name:*
E-mail Address:*
Your Opinion Title:*
Opinion:*
This is to help prevent SPAM submissions. Please enter the words exactly as they appear, including capital letters and punctuation.*

* Fields marked with a * need to be filled in before you hit the submit button.

Contact Our News Editors

For any corrections of factual information, or to contact the editors please use our feedback form.

Please send any medical news or health news press releases to:

Note: Any medical information published on this website is not intended as a substitute for informed medical advice and you should not take any action before consulting with a health care professional. For more information, please read our terms and conditions.


Alcohol / Addiction / Illegal Drugs

What Is a Hangover?

A hangover is a collection of signs and symptoms linked to a recent bout of heavy drinking. The sufferer typically has a headache, feels sick, dizzy, sleepy, confused and thirsty. Read more...

How Is Gambling Bad For You?

In some cases, gambling can become a problematic behavior causing many difficulties. This type of compulsive behavior is often called "problem gambling." Read more...

What is Addiction?

People with an addiction do not have control over what they are doing, taking or using. Their addiction may reach a point at which it is harmful. Read more...

Most Popular Articles



Follow Our Alcohol News On Twitter

Follow Us On Twitter
Get the latest news for this category delivered straight to your Twitter account. Simply visit our Alcohol / Addiction / Illegal Drugs Twitter account and select the 'follow' option.



View list of all 'What Is...' articles »