Airport Scanners Safe, When Working Properly
Editor's ChoiceMain Category: Radiology / Nuclear Medicine
Also Included In: Public Health; Bio-terrorism / Terrorism
Article Date: 26 Nov 2010 - 11:00 PDT
'Airport Scanners Safe, When Working Properly'
| Patient / Public: | ![]() |
3 (1 votes) |
| Healthcare Prof: | ![]() |
4 (1 votes) |
| Article opinions: | 2 posts |
Being scanned at an airport by a body scanner emits such a tiny amount of radiation, that there is no threat to health, as long as the machine is working properly, Peter Rez, Professor of Physics, Arizona State University says.
The chances of receiving a life-threatening cancer are approximately 1 in 30 million, Rez added. Compare that to a 1 in 5 million risk of being struck by lightning. Manufacturers say the radiation dose is one-thousandth of what one would receive during a dental x-ray.
These figures only refer to devices that are working properly and do not jam. Jamming is possible, during which a radiation dose can shoot up, Prof. Rez explained.
Even though body scanners have a safety mechanism that should shut off the machine if anything goes wrong, there is no guarantee that mechanism won't fail.
If the scanner jams and the safety mechanism fails, there is a chance a human could end up with a radiation burn.
In fact, Prof. Rez himself chooses not to go through the scanner because he has no idea what the risk of the safety mechanism failing is.
FDA Engineer Daniel Kassiday says:
-
"The dose from one screening with a general-use X-ray security screening system is so low that it presents an extremely small risk to any individual."
General-use X-ray security systems are also called backscatter systems. Tiny amounts of X-ray (low dose ionizing radiation) bounce off the person who is being screened; the reflected energy is captured by a series of extremely sensitive detectors and then processed into an image via a computer. The radiation dose is so low, the FDA informs, that there is no limit on the number of screenings one person can have each year.
42 minutes of natural everyday-living radiation exposure is about equivalent to the radiation received from one general-use X-ray security system screening session, according to the FDA.
The full-body scanners used at airports are large enough for a person to walk into. The individual must remain inside for a few seconds while the scan is being done.
Kassiday explained:
-
"A person receives more radiation from naturally occurring sources in less than an hour of ordinary living than from one screening with any general-use X-ray security system."
Abiy Desta, an FDA scientist, said:
-
"Millimeter wave security systems that comply with the limits set by the Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers in the applicable non-ionizing radiation safety standard cause no known adverse health effects."
Written by Christian Nordqvist
Copyright: Medical News Today
Not to be reproduced without permission of Medical News Today
MLA
25 May. 2012. <http://www.medicalnewstoday.com/articles/209448.php>
APA
http://www.medicalnewstoday.com/articles/209448.php.
Please note: If no author information is provided, the source is cited instead.
Visitor Opinions (latest shown first)
shingles and millimeter wave scanners
posted by matthew on 26 Mar 2012 at 4:17 pmmy mother recently went through a millimeter wave scanner at an airport. the officer came up to her and asked if she had recently been ill around the base of her neck. My mother said no and the officer let her go. My mom has shingles and the seem to start at the base of her neck and bottom back of her head. Can these machines actually see and detect this?
I'M TAKING THIS WITH A GRAIN OF SALT
posted by Ma on 30 Nov 2010 at 11:53 amSince the X-ray scanners have never been independently tested, I don't have much faith in anyone taking the manufacturer's word on the safety and emissions of the machines, and then commenting that the machines are safe.
Too many other professionals are concerned about their safety.
Add Your Opinion On This Article
'Airport Scanners Safe, When Working Properly'Please note that we publish your name, but we do not publish your email address. It is only used to let you know when your message is published. We do not use it for any other purpose. Please see our privacy policy for more information.
If you write about specific medications or operations, please do not name health care professionals by name.
All opinions are moderated before being included (to stop spam)
Contact Our News Editors
For any corrections of factual information, or to contact the editors please use our feedback form.
![]()
Please send any medical news or health news press releases to:
Note: Any medical information published on this website is not intended as a substitute for informed medical advice and you should not take any action before consulting with a health care professional. For more information, please read our terms and conditions.




