Airport Scanners Safe, When Working Properly

Editor's Choice
Main Category: Radiology / Nuclear Medicine
Also Included In: Public Health;  Bio-terrorism / Terrorism
Article Date: 26 Nov 2010 - 11:00 PDT

Current ratings for:
'Airport Scanners Safe, When Working Properly'

Patient / Public:3 stars

3 (1 votes)

Healthcare Prof:4 stars

4 (1 votes)

Article opinions: 2 posts

Being scanned at an airport by a body scanner emits such a tiny amount of radiation, that there is no threat to health, as long as the machine is working properly, Peter Rez, Professor of Physics, Arizona State University says.

The chances of receiving a life-threatening cancer are approximately 1 in 30 million, Rez added. Compare that to a 1 in 5 million risk of being struck by lightning. Manufacturers say the radiation dose is one-thousandth of what one would receive during a dental x-ray.

These figures only refer to devices that are working properly and do not jam. Jamming is possible, during which a radiation dose can shoot up, Prof. Rez explained.

Even though body scanners have a safety mechanism that should shut off the machine if anything goes wrong, there is no guarantee that mechanism won't fail.

If the scanner jams and the safety mechanism fails, there is a chance a human could end up with a radiation burn.

In fact, Prof. Rez himself chooses not to go through the scanner because he has no idea what the risk of the safety mechanism failing is.

FDA Engineer Daniel Kassiday says: The FDA says that currently US airports use two possible scanning systems: 1. General-use X-ray security systems, or 2. Millimeter wave security systems.

General-use X-ray security systems are also called backscatter systems. Tiny amounts of X-ray (low dose ionizing radiation) bounce off the person who is being screened; the reflected energy is captured by a series of extremely sensitive detectors and then processed into an image via a computer. The radiation dose is so low, the FDA informs, that there is no limit on the number of screenings one person can have each year.

42 minutes of natural everyday-living radiation exposure is about equivalent to the radiation received from one general-use X-ray security system screening session, according to the FDA.

The full-body scanners used at airports are large enough for a person to walk into. The individual must remain inside for a few seconds while the scan is being done.

Kassiday explained: Millimeter wave security systems use non-ionizing electromagnetic waves that bounce off the human body, the energy that bounces off generates an image. There are two types: active systems which expose the screened individual to tiny amounts of millimeter wave energy, and passive systems that sense naturally occurring millimeter wave emissions that radiate from a warm body.

Abiy Desta, an FDA scientist, said: Source: FDA

Written by Christian Nordqvist
Copyright: Medical News Today
Not to be reproduced without permission of Medical News Today

Visit our radiology / nuclear medicine section for the latest news on this subject.
There are no references listed for this article.
Please use one of the following formats to cite this article in your essay, paper or report:

MLA
Christian Nordqvist. "Airport Scanners Safe, When Working Properly." Medical News Today. MediLexicon, Intl., 26 Nov. 2010. Web.
25 May. 2012. <http://www.medicalnewstoday.com/articles/209448.php>

APA
Christian Nordqvist. (2010, November 26). "Airport Scanners Safe, When Working Properly." Medical News Today. Retrieved from
http://www.medicalnewstoday.com/articles/209448.php.

Please note: If no author information is provided, the source is cited instead.



Visitor Opinions (latest shown first)

shingles and millimeter wave scanners

posted by matthew on 26 Mar 2012 at 4:17 pm

my mother recently went through a millimeter wave scanner at an airport. the officer came up to her and asked if she had recently been ill around the base of her neck. My mother said no and the officer let her go. My mom has shingles and the seem to start at the base of her neck and bottom back of her head. Can these machines actually see and detect this?

| post followup | alert a moderator |


I'M TAKING THIS WITH A GRAIN OF SALT

posted by Ma on 30 Nov 2010 at 11:53 am

Since the X-ray scanners have never been independently tested, I don't have much faith in anyone taking the manufacturer's word on the safety and emissions of the machines, and then commenting that the machines are safe.

Too many other professionals are concerned about their safety.

| post followup | alert a moderator |


Add Your Opinion On This Article

'Airport Scanners Safe, When Working Properly'

Please note that we publish your name, but we do not publish your email address. It is only used to let you know when your message is published. We do not use it for any other purpose. Please see our privacy policy for more information.

If you write about specific medications or operations, please do not name health care professionals by name.

All opinions are moderated before being included (to stop spam)

Your Name:*
E-mail Address:*
Your Opinion Title:*
Opinion:*
This is to help prevent SPAM submissions. Please enter the words exactly as they appear, including capital letters and punctuation.*

* Fields marked with a * need to be filled in before you hit the submit button.

Contact Our News Editors

For any corrections of factual information, or to contact the editors please use our feedback form.

Please send any medical news or health news press releases to:

Note: Any medical information published on this website is not intended as a substitute for informed medical advice and you should not take any action before consulting with a health care professional. For more information, please read our terms and conditions.


Radiology / Nuclear Medicine

Most Popular Articles



Follow Our Radiology News On Twitter

Follow Us On Twitter
Get the latest news for this category delivered straight to your Twitter account. Simply visit our Radiology / Nuclear Medicine Twitter account and select the 'follow' option.



View list of all 'What Is...' articles »