Breastfeeding Exclusively For First Six Months May Not Be Best For Babies
Featured ArticleMain Category: Pediatrics / Children's Health
Also Included In: Nutrition / Diet; Nursing / Midwifery
Article Date: 14 Jan 2011 - 2:00 PDT
| Patient / Public: | ![]() |
3 (2 votes) |
| Healthcare Prof: | ![]() |
1.75 (8 votes) |
| Article Opinions: | 5 posts |
Breastfeeding babies exclusively without introducing other foods until they are six months old may not be in their best interest, suggest UK researchers in a study published this week in BMJ.
The recommendation that mothers in the UK should breastfeed their babies exclusively for six months is a controversial area of child nutrition, and after reviewing the evidence, Dr Mary Fewtrell, a consultant paediatrician at the Institute of Child Health in University College London (UCL), and colleagues, said while they back exclusive breastfeeding early in life, they question whether this should continue until babies are six months old.
You can read how they came to their conclusions in the 13 January online issue of BMJ.
Fewtrell and colleagues support the World Health Organization (WHO) recommendation of six months exclusive breastfeeding in less developed countries, where clean water and safe weaning foods are not available to everyone, and there is a high risk of infant death and illness. But they question whether it is right for babies raised in the UK.
The authors point out there is a difference between breastfeeding, which can continue after babies start eating solid foods, and exclusive breastfeeding, where apart from vitamins and mineral supplements, babies have no other source of nutrition.
In their background information they cite evidence that what babies consume in their first half year of life makes a big difference to their long term health, for instance by "programming aspects of subsequent cognitive function, obesity, risk of cardiovascular disease, cancer, and atopy [hypersensitivity to allergens]".
In 2001, the WHO asked member states to adopt its global recommendation that babies should be exclusively breastfed for the first six months of their lives. The US, 65 per cent of EU countries, and other western nations, chose not to follow this recommendation in full, and some have not at all.
Supporting the WHO recommendation is a systematic review done in 2000 of 16 studies, including 7 studies of babies in developing countries. The review concluded that exclusively breastfed babies developed fewer infections and experienced no growth problems.
In 2003, the health minister said the UK would comply with the WHO recommendation, but this "major, population-wide change in public health policy" was backed by evidence that "underwent surprisingly little scrutiny", write Fewtrell and colleagues, in fact, even the Department of Health's own Scientific Advisory Committee on Nutrition (SACN) was not invited formally to look at the scientific evidence.
In view of this omission, and given that the European Food Safety Authority (EFSA) has since released new data and an expert review that concludes that for babies in the EU, it is safe for them to start having complementary foods between four and six months, the authors suggest now is the right time to question the UK's position.
Fewtrell and colleagues argue, with references to studies, that giving babies only breast milk is not enough nutrition for their first six months of life. They say such babies have a higher risk of iron deficiency anaemia, and may also be at higher risk for celiac disease and food allergies by not being exposed to certain solid foods earlier.
They also suggest that giving babies only breast milk for six months reduces the window of opportunity for introducing them to new tastes, particularly the bitter foods, which can affect the extent to which they accept green leafy vegetables later. This could predispose them to unhealthy eating and obesity, they argue.
"Six months of exclusive breast feeding: how good is the evidence?"
Mary Fewtrell, David C Wilson, Ian Booth, Alan Lucas.
BMJ, 2011; 342:c5955; Published online 13 January 2011.
DOI: 10.1136/bmj.c5955
Additional source: BMJ press release, 13 Jan 2011.
Written by: Catharine Paddock, PhD
Copyright: Medical News Today
Not to be reproduced without permission of Medical News Today
MLA
23 Feb. 2012. <http://www.medicalnewstoday.com/articles/213696.php>
APA
http://www.medicalnewstoday.com/articles/213696.php.
Please note: If no author information is provided, the source is cited instead.
|
Rate this article: (Hover over the stars then click to rate) |
Patient / Public: |
or |
Health Professional: |
Visitor Opinions In Chronological Order (5)
Breastfeeding exclusively 6 months
posted by Priti Patel on 14 Jan 2011 at 2:46 amI don't agree with government guidelines to exclusively breastfeed without introducing solids for six months. Every baby is different and milk is just not enough, at 4 months a small amount of baby food with milk can be introduced to stimulate their taste as it takes them a while even months to adjust to different tastes, better to start early. Also it's providing your baby with more vitamins which is essential, breastfeeding isn't enough.
breast feeding
posted by kathryn on 14 Jan 2011 at 5:38 amI totaly agree with the comment made by Priti.Our grandparents breast fed plus weaning was introduced at an earlier age,there was no peanut butter but everything else was include including eggs.Perhaps if thes foods were introduced at an earlier age there would be less allergies or milder ones.
Pros and Cons
posted by Melissa S. on 14 Jan 2011 at 6:35 amWhat this article should help us understand is that nutrition is complex. In other words, although we may not recommend that a baby feed (in developed countries) exclusively on breast milk, still leaves many questions for us to ponder. I think it is important to note breast milk already brings different tastes; babies are exposed to different tastes starting from when they are in the womb with the amniotic fluid and then later in the form of breast milk which adapts and takes on different tastes depending on the mother diet. Additionally, the quality of the breast milk (vitamins/nutrients) can be affected by the mother’s nutritional habits. As professionals, we must be careful with this news and learn how to best support a child’s optimal development while taking family’s limited resources into account (and babies limited linguistic capacities to communicate allergic reactions to parents).
Lots of problems with this article, see my blog
posted by Miriam H Labbok on 14 Jan 2011 at 11:13 amHeadlines are misleading, and this article has many problems. Please see my blog comments at breastfeeding4health.com.
Heavy ties to baby food industry biases research
posted by K Goa on 15 Jan 2011 at 8:53 pmThree out of four of the authors of this study have significant ties to the multi-billion dollar baby food industry. Corporate sponsored research is known to be heavily biased. This article is not evidence based and contradicts the large and growing body of evidence based non-industry tied research that supports exclusive breastfeeding until the middle of the first year.
This BMJ article and it's widespread distribution in the media is only going to do harm to mothers and babies who are doing the best they can with the information (and mis-information) they have.
This is a link to the UNICEF response to the BMJ article.
http://www.babyfriendly.org.uk/pdfs/unicef_uk_response_to_BMJ_article_140111.pdf
Add Your Opinion
Please note that we publish your name, but we do not publish your email address. It is only used to let you know when your message is published. We do not use it for any other purpose. Please see our privacy policy for more information.
If you write about specific medications or operations, please do not name health care professionals by name.
All opinions are moderated before being included (to stop spam)
Contact Our News Editors
For any corrections of factual information, or to contact the editors please use our feedback form.
![]()
Please send any medical news or health news press releases to:
Note: Any medical information published on this website is not intended as a substitute for informed medical advice and you should not take any action before consulting with a health care professional. For more information, please read our terms and conditions.





