New Guidelines: Costly CAT Scans, MRIs, Often Unnecessary
Editor's ChoiceMain Category: Back Pain
Article Date: 01 Feb 2011 - 11:00 PDT
'New Guidelines: Costly CAT Scans, MRIs, Often Unnecessary'
| Patient / Public: | ![]() |
|
| Healthcare Prof: | ![]() |
4.5 (4 votes) |
| Article opinions: | 2 posts |
Commonly directed CAT scans and MRIs, which are rather costly, may be completely unnecessary and a waste of time according to newly released guidelines. These CAT scans can cost patients and insurers up to $1,500 and an MRI, sometimes up to $3,000 while not proving to be at all beneficial and simply routine.
Amir Qaseem, MD, PhD, MHA, FACP, director of clinical policy for The American College of Physicians (ACP) states:
"Low back pain is one of the most common reasons for a patient to see a physician and many patients with low back pain receive routine imaging that is not beneficial and may even be harmful. Unnecessary imaging can lead to a series of unnecessary additional tests, interventions, follow ups, and referrals that do not improve patient outcomes."
The ACP's recommendations are based on a systematic review conducted for the Diagnosis and Treatment of Low Back Pain joint clinical practice guideline from ACP and the American Pain Society, and a subsequent meta-analysis.
Decisions for repeat imaging should be based on the development of new symptoms or changes in current symptoms. To be most effective, efforts to reduce routine imaging should take into account clinician behaviors, patient expectations, and financial incentives.
Patient education strategies should be utilized to inform patients about current and effective standards of care and help them understand the benefits and harms of the radiological testing.
An MRI machine uses a powerful magnetic field to align the magnetization of some atoms in the body, and radio frequency fields to systematically alter the alignment of this magnetization. This causes the nuclei to produce a rotating magnetic field detectable by the scanner, and this information is recorded to construct an image of the scanned area of the body. Strong magnetic field gradients cause nuclei at different locations to rotate at different speeds. 3-D spatial information can be obtained by providing gradients in each direction.
X-ray computed tomography (CT or CAT) is a medical imaging method employing tomography created by computer processing. Digital geometry processing is used to generate a three-dimensional image of the inside of an object from a large series of two-dimensional X-ray images taken around a single axis of rotation.
Paul Shekelle, MD, PhD, FACP, chair of ACP's Clinical Guidelines Committee continues:
"Efforts to control expenditures should not focus solely on the costs, but rather on the value of health-care interventions. The best way to maintain effective and efficient care is to identify and eliminate wasteful practices, and to demonstrate which interventions provide high-value, which means their benefit is sufficient to justify their harms and costs."
The ACP continues that for doctors, it is essential to assess the benefits, harms, and costs of an intervention to understand whether it provides good value. It is important to reduce the use of interventions that provide no benefit. Assessment of the cost of an intervention should include not only the cost of the intervention itself, but also any downstream costs that occur because the intervention was performed.
For interventions that provide additional benefit at additional cost, ACP recommends assessing their value to patients and society with cost-effectiveness analysis.
Source: American College of Physicians
Written By Sy Kraft, B.A.
Copyright: Medical News Today
Not to be reproduced without permission of Medical News Today
MLA
26 May. 2012. <http://www.medicalnewstoday.com/articles/215386.php>
APA
http://www.medicalnewstoday.com/articles/215386.php.
Please note: If no author information is provided, the source is cited instead.
Visitor Opinions (latest shown first)
Unnecessary imaging a big problem
posted by Daniel Bullock M.D. on 21 Mar 2011 at 11:36 amSorry you have had so much expensive spine care. The point is (and your case illustrates it rather well). Conventional medical treatment is to rule out cancer with a $3,000 MRI, when it could more easily be ruled out with a simple 5 minute "Red Flags" interview/questionnaire by an informed doctor.
Sad to say, most doctors don't know how - so they order an MRI. MRI's simply do not show the cause of the back pain - they only show abnormal anatomy - for many people abnormal anatomy does not hurt. Plus, MRI for back pain does not improve pain-relief outcomes. (Lancet)
But, the MRI is too-often the first big step onto the slippery slope that leads to "unnecessary additional tests, interventions, follow ups, and referrals that do not improve patient outcomes..."
That often includes multiple spine surgeries. As Hulk Hogan recently stated (after his 8th spine surgery): "They still don't know what is causing my pain."
That is why the American Academy of Orthopedic Surgeons has endorsed the opinion stated in this article. Most doctors and patients don't know this but "the conventional medical approach" is a failed model of back pain treatment. (Orthopedic Knowledge Update, Spine, Volume 2)
80-90 percent of the time doctors won't find the "cause" of back pain. That is why new, faster, less-costly approaches like "pattern-recognition" are proving over ten times more effective.
Those interested in a newer, better back pain paradigm may try googling "back pain pattern recognition" for more clinically-tested info.
Dr Dan
I disagree
posted by RCK on 17 Mar 2011 at 2:39 amI have had spine issues sense I was 19. I am now 48. sense I was 40, I have had 4 spine operations.
I have had MRIs threw the years. When I first for them, they ran about 500 dollars. And that's when they were NEW, and very few. Yet now its 3000 dollars and more available. It first of all, made sure that I did not have cancer. Thats important. And next, it allowed me to know what I could and could NOT or was recommended. It it were just based on Dr.s whims, there could be more damage done that could have been prevented.
The problem is cost, not if they need to get done or not. Pain NEEDS to be looked at, and an answer found out as to why one has it. Its just common sense. The article in many ways sounds like it was written by an insurance co. rather they a Doctor.
The spine has to much an important part of the body to play around with.
Add Your Opinion On This Article
'New Guidelines: Costly CAT Scans, MRIs, Often Unnecessary'Please note that we publish your name, but we do not publish your email address. It is only used to let you know when your message is published. We do not use it for any other purpose. Please see our privacy policy for more information.
If you write about specific medications or operations, please do not name health care professionals by name.
All opinions are moderated before being included (to stop spam)
Contact Our News Editors
For any corrections of factual information, or to contact the editors please use our feedback form.
![]()
Please send any medical news or health news press releases to:
Note: Any medical information published on this website is not intended as a substitute for informed medical advice and you should not take any action before consulting with a health care professional. For more information, please read our terms and conditions.



