Drug Shortages Have Hospitals Scrambling For Alternatives
Editor's ChoiceMain Category: Pharmacy / Pharmacist
Also Included In: Public Health; Pharma Industry / Biotech Industry
Article Date: 30 May 2011 - 9:00 PDT
| Patient / Public: | ![]() |
4.44 (16 votes) |
| Healthcare Prof: | ![]() |
4.56 (25 votes) |
| Article Opinions: | 11 posts |
Hospitals are finding themselves short of a wide range of medications more frequently and for longer. Delaying treatment is becoming less of a rarity at US hospitals today. Emergency doctors fear that soon lives will be lost when they cannot get their hands on some crucial drugs.
There are times when the supply and demand of certain drugs go in wrong directions and there is a shortage, and sometimes total unavailability. What concerns a growing number of health care professionals is that the problem is growing rapidly. 211 drugs were listed as in short supply in 2010, three times more than in 2006.
The University of Utah's Drug Information Service informs that during the first quarter of this year there have been 89 drug shortages. Just on the 25th and 26th of May, 2011, the American Society of Health-System Pharmacists reported new shortages of the following medications - Ciprofloxacin Immediate-Release tablets, Magnesium sulfate injection, Paclitaxel injection, Aminocrapoix acid injection, Prochlorperazine edisylate injection, Triamterene and Hydrochlorothiazide capsules and tablets, and Vasopressin injection.
Hospital pharmacists and medical personnel inform that some shortages can go on for several months. Many of these medications have no ideal substitute. Hospitals in several other countries are reporting similar problems.
In some cases it might be a chemotherapy medication for cancer treatment. Local media in Florida reported a case of a 14-year-old girl with leukemia whose chemotherapy sessions had to be postponed because of a long-lasting nationwide cytarabine shortage.
Pharmacists and drugmakers cite the following reasons for drug shortages:
- Product recalls
- Contaminated vials
- Difficulties in importing certain raw materials
- Demand fluctuations
- Production plants being upgraded (and closed while the upgrade is being carried out)
Shortages include drugs for a wide range of therapeutic areas, including premature babies, septic shock, intravenous feeding, fertility treatment, ADHD, emergency room cardiac arrest, cystic fibrosis, and cancer.
According to the Institute for Safe Medication Practices, two patients died last year because their substitute painkiller dosage was wrong - at the time there was a shortage of morphine. However, nobody is monitoring patient harm at a national level.
Approximately 40% of thyroid cancer patients will not have access to a drug - Thyrogen - until July or August this year. Thyrogen helps patients who have had their thyroid gland surgically removed avoid the considerable side effects of hormone withdrawal. For those who need this medication, there is no comparable available alternative drug. The European Journal of Endocrinology reports that patients on Thyrogen had 8.1 fewer absent days from work compared to those on withdrawal. Most endocrinologists prescribe Thyrogen before treatment.
Worldwide supplies of Thyrogen will be unreliable until about July, says the Genzyme Corporation, makers of the drug.
Recent shortages of ADHD (attention deficit hyperactive disorder) drugs have sent patients or their parents going from pharmacy-to-pharmacy desperately seeking medications such as Adderall and its generic equivalents. According to IMS Health, the shortage affected a combined 24.2 million prescriptions' worth of drugs in 2010.
Franciscan St. Elizabeth Health Clinical Manager, pharmacist Carol Miller said in a recent interview:
"As a pharmacist working for 20-some years, I've seen shortages, but nothing with the numbers of drugs out there that are short at this time."
Miller believes the recent global economic crisis has affected drug supplies. When the economy is tight pharmaceutical companies tend to drop production of the least money making drugs. If there are generic products available, some drug companies simply stop making their brand products.
With current federal regulations the way they are, it is difficult for generic makers to respond rapidly.
Written by Christian Nordqvist
Copyright: Medical News Today
Not to be reproduced without permission of Medical News Today
MLA
23 Feb. 2012. <http://www.medicalnewstoday.com/articles/226896.php>
APA
http://www.medicalnewstoday.com/articles/226896.php.
Please note: If no author information is provided, the source is cited instead.
|
Rate this article: (Hover over the stars then click to rate) |
Patient / Public: |
or |
Health Professional: |
Visitor Opinions In Chronological Order (11)
Bailout a'comin'
posted by S. A. Linden on 30 May 2011 at 11:09 amAs with so many other industries, we're now seeing the negative effects of so-called "free enterprise." Perhaps some of the shortages discussed above are natural and inevitable in a changing world, but I'd guess that Big Pharma (already richer than god) is angling for an eventual government bailout. Once the power is in place, it can be manipulated in so many ways. Waving the threat of the Big "C" in our faces, and other inconveniences such as the constant distraction of our hyper-stimulated children . . . well, it's a sure thing that people will agree to subsidize what is already one of the wealthiest corporate categories on the face of the earth.
Free market model fails health care
posted by joanna bujes on 30 May 2011 at 11:33 amIt sounds to me like the free market model is not working very well. This is not surprising because getting sick or injured and needing expert care is the farthest thing I can think of from a shopping experience.
These drug shortages are the tip of the iceberg
posted by rusty94114 on 30 May 2011 at 11:39 amThe article states: "With current federal regulations the way they are, it is difficult for generic makers to respond rapidly."
Not surprising. Government agencies like the FDA have become the public's worst enemy in regard to medical progress and accessibility. Far more injuries and deaths are caused by the obstructionist policies of these agencies than are prevented by their removal of dangerous products from the market.
Are you surprised
posted by alex on 30 May 2011 at 12:31 pmWhat do you think of Obama health plan? If you think this is bad news just stay turned and watch you haven't seen anything yet.
Drug companies should not provide welfare
posted by George Douglas on 30 May 2011 at 12:34 pmThe drug companies are businesses. They have no obligation to make products that are unprofitable. When the government forces drug prices to be lower than the amount investors want to support, the products will disappear. When a drug company has spent millions to develop a needed drug and before they can make up for the investment and make a profit for a few years, the drug becomes generic due to government regulations, why should they try? What a lot of people want from drug companies is the equivalent to welfare.
Duh? Profit and health?
posted by Mikee on 30 May 2011 at 12:37 pmThis is what happens when you put for-profit companies in charge of our health care system.
Happy you mentioned my Rx by name... Sad it's come to this
posted by Anon on 30 May 2011 at 2:26 pmI use a ADD medication for narcolepsy (Adderall). It's regulated, so my doctor can't give me a 90 day dose (or a larger dose to split in two), and about every other month I have a minor panic attack trying to track it down. If I can't find it, I can fall back on an old supply of Provigil, lots of caffeine, or temporarily borrow from an out-of-town friend's prescription (if they managed to find it themselves) for a few days... but doing that throws me out of whack for up to a week after I finally get back on my proper medication at the proper dose.
It's pathetic.
The FDA, however, has been *lax* in doing their job, not "obstructionist". More so now than ever, although you can do the research on your own about that.
As far as the meds, well, profits over people. As bad as my situation is when I can't get a hold of my meds (not really safe to drive, can't really function properly, etc), at least I'm not waiting for chemotherapy. My God.
Stop treating medicine as if it were tea
posted by John Grimes on 30 May 2011 at 4:11 pmI am happy to see that most opinions above indicate that Americans are starting to "get it" when it comes to the big lie of Big Pharma and its allies in Congress. Medicine is not and never has been a business, any more than education, police work, or fire prevention are businesses. None of these necessary public services respond well to the American capitalist model despite what the ideologues who enjoy Ayn Rand's fiction may say. Frankly, I don't care if the social Neanderthals want to call it "socialized medicine" or Norwegian spaghetti, I say "bring it on", the sooner the better. Michael Moore was right about America's lunatic love affair with guns, and he is just as right about the dangers of 'for profit' medicine.
Seriously? You call this a Free Market?
posted by Jenkie on 30 May 2011 at 7:26 pmThe is one of the most heavily regulated and lobbied sectors of any market, at any time in history. Big Pharma has a history of buying legislation - which they were kind enough to compose themselves - that locks-in profits and deters competition.
In a natural free market, manufacturers and suppliers would scramble to "capitalize" on shortages. Although we've been trained to think this is a bad word, it actually confers an efficiency via competition, that can only be conferred by the mechanisms of strong demand and profit motive. The free market always addresses these issues more efficiently than any system of planned supply. Bureaucrats wist job security, pensions and revolving-door private sector options can never compete with an honest free market.
Deregulate, let manufacturers compete, and maintain safety through quality of brand, and allow 3rd parties to develop an oversight and advisory industry. We will see health care prices plummet across the board, and quality increase with competition
Tina
posted by Tina on 31 May 2011 at 9:32 amIt is interesting reading all the posts here. Most seem to cluster at the extremes: government is bad, deregulate and let us be free! Or: big pharma is evil and the source of all health care woes!
Thankfully, some are reasoned opinions. I also believe that medical products are not equivalent to tea (for market freedom) and more like nuclear energy and education; we do need government to set rules and standards for these businesses. It also helps us coordinate these industries around the world. In fact, the answer to these shortages is an industry, government and practitioner consortium (shocking concept that is already in existence and working well).
Let these consortia determine the best path forward. If they determine a need for incentives or target relaxed regulatory pathways are appropriate, so be it. Neither of those would spell the end to civilization or democracy. Inflammatory rhetoric on both sides is what has to change. In my opinion, THAT is what is preventing progress and positive change.
First 10 opinions shown. For all opinions, click through to the full thread.
Add Your Opinion
Please note that we publish your name, but we do not publish your email address. It is only used to let you know when your message is published. We do not use it for any other purpose. Please see our privacy policy for more information.
If you write about specific medications or operations, please do not name health care professionals by name.
All opinions are moderated before being included (to stop spam)
Contact Our News Editors
For any corrections of factual information, or to contact the editors please use our feedback form.
![]()
Please send any medical news or health news press releases to:
Note: Any medical information published on this website is not intended as a substitute for informed medical advice and you should not take any action before consulting with a health care professional. For more information, please read our terms and conditions.




