Potato Alert! Creeping Weight Gain Tied To Type Of Food
Featured ArticleAcademic Journal
Main Category: Obesity / Weight Loss / Fitness
Also Included In: Nutrition / Diet; Public Health
Article Date: 23 Jun 2011 - 2:00 PDT
| Patient / Public: | ![]() |
4.25 (8 votes) |
| Healthcare Prof: | ![]() |
3.4 (5 votes) |
| Article Opinions: | 1 posts |
Potato chips, other potatoes, sugary drinks, processed and unprocessed meat were found to be the foods most strongly linked to creeping weight gain, according to an analysis of studies that followed over 120,000 adults for 20 years. The researchers said their evidence supports the idea that "eat less and exercise more" may be too simplistic a weight-loss strategy, it is the quality of food that matters most and making a handful of small, targeted changes is likely to be more effective.
The researchers, from the Harvard School of Public Health (HSPH) in Boston, Massachusetts, write about their findings in the 23 June online issue of the New England Journal of Medicine, NEJM.
Senior author Dr Frank Hu, professor of nutrition and epidemiology at HSPH, told the press their findings:
"... underscore the importance of making wise food choices in preventing weight gain and obesity."
"The idea that there are no 'good' or 'bad' foods is a myth that needs to be debunked," he added.
Many studies focus on what to do after people become overweight or obese, and we know less about what lies behind the creeping weight gain that happens over one or two decades.
Lead author Dr Dariush Mozaffarian, an associate professor in the Department of Epidemiology at HSPH, said:
"An average adult gains about one pound per year. Because the weight gain is so gradual and occurs over many years, it has been difficult for scientists and for individuals themselves to understand the specific factors that may be responsible."
Mozaffarian, who is also a professor in HSPH's Division of Cardiovascular Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital (BWH), and Harvard Medical School, and colleagues conducted three separate prospective analyses to look at how changes in diet and lifestyle linked to long term weight gain.
They found that small changes in diet, consumption of beverages, physical activity, watching TV, and sleep duration were the factors most strongly linked to long-term weight gain, and the strongest of these, was changes in diet.
They analyzed data from participants taking part in three separate large scale long term studies: the Nurses' Health Study (NHS: 50,422 women included in their final analysis), the Nurses' Health Study II (NHS II: 47,898 women included), and the Health Professionals Follow-up Study (HPFS: 22,557 men included). These studies followed participants from 1986 to 2006, 1991 to 2003, and 1986 to 2006, respectively.
All of the participants were free of obesity and chronic diseases at the start of the study period.
Mozaffarian and colleagues expressed their results according to 4-year intervals and over 20 years. For each 4-year interval, they found that the average weight gain per participant was 3.35 lbs (1.52 kg), which corresponds to an average of 16.8 lbs (7.62 kg) over 20 years.
When they looked at links between lifestyle changes and weight gain, they found very similar results across the three cohorts. Increases in daily servings of foods such as potatoes, sugary drinks and meats contributed significantly to the average weight gain, whereas increases in daily servings of foods such as vegetables, whole grains, fruits and nuts, tended to work in the other direction.
For instance, on the basis of increased daily servings of individual dietary components, the following foods were linked to increased weight gain:
- Potato chips ("crisps" in the UK) accounted for +1.69 lbs of the 3.35 lbs average weight gain every 4 years.
- Other potatoes accounted for +1.28 lbs.
- Sugary drinks: +1.00 lbs.
- Unprocessed meats: +0.95 lbs.
- Processed meats: +0.93 lbs.
- Vegetables: accounted for -0.22 lbs (ie a reduction) in the 3.35 lbs average weight gain every 4 years.
- Whole grains accounted for -0.37 lbs.
- Fruits: -0.49 lbs.
- Nuts: -0.57 lbs.
- Yogurt: -0.82 lbs.
However, while the amount of weight gain linked to any one lifestyle change was small, it was their total effect that made the difference. A cluster of lifestyle changes can make a significant impact, for "bad or good", said Mozaffarian.
"This makes it easy to gain weight unintentionally, but also demonstrates the tremendous opportunity for prevention. A handful of the right lifestyle changes will go a long way," he added.
The researchers suggest their findings show it is not a good idea to focus on total calories as a way to lose weight. Even other measures such as total fat, energy density, and sugar content could also be misleading.
We would do better, they say, if we attend to the overall quality of our diet, and focus on improving carbohydrate quality, consuming less processed foods and increasing our intake of minimimally processed foods: in other words:
- Less sugary liquids, such as sodas.
- Fewer potatoes and refined grains like white bread, white rice, low-fiber breakfast cereals.
- Less processed meats.
- More fruits, vegetables, whole grains, nuts and yogurt.
Funds from the National Institutes of Health and the Searle Scholars Program helped pay for the study.
"Changes in Diet and Lifestyle and Long-Term Weight Gain in Women and Men."
Dariush Mozaffarian, Tao Hao,Eric B. Rimm, Walter C. Willett, and Frank B. Hu
N Engl J Med 2011; 364:2392-2404.
Published online 23 June 2011
DOI: 10.1056/NEJMoa1014296
Additional source: Harvard School of Public Health .
Written by: Catharine Paddock, PhD
Copyright: Medical News Today
Not to be reproduced without permission of Medical News Today
MLA
23 Feb. 2012. <http://www.medicalnewstoday.com/articles/229400.php>
APA
http://www.medicalnewstoday.com/articles/229400.php.
Please note: If no author information is provided, the source is cited instead.
|
Rate this article: (Hover over the stars then click to rate) |
Patient / Public: |
or |
Health Professional: |
Visitor Opinions In Chronological Order (1)
A Resounding Agreement with Data to Back It Up
posted by regan on 23 Jun 2011 at 6:21 pmI am one who can vouch for Dr. Hu's findings in "the importance of making wise food choices in preventing weight obesity."
I had steadily gained weight, year by year, since achieving adulthood at about age 17 weighing 154 lbs. By the time I was 51, I weighed 230 lbs. About 75 lbs gained over about 3 and a half "decades."
That average's to a little more than two pounds per year but is still consistent with Dr. Mozaffarian's finding concerning "creeping weight gain that happens over one or two decades..." when he said: "An average adult gains about one pound per year." I am a tall man which may explain my somewhat higher than average creeping gain. This I say because my diet was exactly the same "potatoes, sugary drinks and meats..." that they said, "contributed significantly to the average weight gain...".
But now in the last 13 months I have steadily declined in weight, losing as much as 63 pounds, using a diet very close to way they said "We would do better... if we attend to the overall quality of our diet, and focus on improving carbohydrate quality, consuming less processed foods and increasing our intake of minimimally processed foods..."
The only thing I see missing from that description, in my experience, would be to emphasize a major reduction in overall consumption of carbohydrates.
But one could infer this point from their prescription of "improving carbohydrate quality, consuming less processed foods and increasing our intake of minimimally processed foods..." because "...increasing our intake of minimimally processed foods..." implies an offset reduction in other food sources since we tend to always eat the samed size meals. And they do explicitly give "...consuming less processed foods..." as one area in which to reduce.
But another area of offset that should, in my opinion, be expressed explicitly is to dramatically reduce the overall carbohydrate quantity. And they essentially imply this by saying we should be "...improving carbohydrate quality...". The obvious approach to increasing quality is to cut out the massive amounts of lower quality carbohydrates while retaining and even increasing the higher quality carbohydrates consumed to yield an "improv[ed] carbohydrate quality..." while at the same time satisfying the their implied requirement to offset the "increasing our intake of minimimally processed foods" in order to maintain our usual sized meals.
I'll not quibble over fruits and yogurt but leave off with a resounding AGREEMENT with the general conclusions and guidance given in this timely article that I can POSITIVELY confirm with data from my own, decades long, experience.
Regan
La Jolla, CA
Add Your Opinion
Please note that we publish your name, but we do not publish your email address. It is only used to let you know when your message is published. We do not use it for any other purpose. Please see our privacy policy for more information.
If you write about specific medications or operations, please do not name health care professionals by name.
All opinions are moderated before being included (to stop spam)
Contact Our News Editors
For any corrections of factual information, or to contact the editors please use our feedback form.
![]()
Please send any medical news or health news press releases to:
Note: Any medical information published on this website is not intended as a substitute for informed medical advice and you should not take any action before consulting with a health care professional. For more information, please read our terms and conditions.







