Cellphones Do Not Cause Tumors, Large Study Reports

Editor's Choice
Academic Journal
Main Category: Cancer / Oncology
Also Included In: Neurology / Neuroscience;  Public Health
Article Date: 23 Oct 2011 - 9:00 PDT

Current ratings for:
'Cellphones Do Not Cause Tumors, Large Study Reports'

Patient / Public:3 and a half stars

3.5 (4 votes)

Healthcare Prof:3 stars

3 (2 votes)

Article opinions: 3 posts

A Danish study involving 358,403 people over an 18-year period found no evidence of an association between long-term cellphone usage and the risk of brain or CNS (central nervous system) tumors. The researchers, from the Danish Cancer Society and the International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC) reported in the BMJ (British Medical Journal) that theirs is the largest study ever made to investigate whether there might be a link between long-term cellphone usage and cancer risk.

The study was funded by the Danish Strategic Research Council, the Swiss National Science Foundation, and the Danish Graduate School in Public Health Science. No funds came from the mobile phone industry or companies that supply the industry.

Mobile phone usage has grown enormously over the last ten years - in 2010 there were over 5 billion subscriptions globally, the authors wrote. An ever-growing concern has been whether such communication devices eventually raise the risk of developing tumors in the central nervous system.


Mobile phone map 1980-2009
Global mobile phone subscribers per country from 1980-2009


The central nervous system or CNS is the part of the nervous system that includes the brain and spinal cord. It is one of the two major divisions of the nervous system - the other being the peripheral nervous system (PNS) which is outside the spinal cord and brain and connects the CNS to sensory organs, such as the ear and eye, and other organs, as well as muscles, glands and blood vessels.


CNS
Central Nervous System (2) consists of the brain (1) and spinal cord (3)


The researchers explained that prior studies that set out to determine whether cellphone usage affected tumor risk have been inconclusive, especially with regards to long-term use. Some of the case control studies were found to be flawed, while others were undermined by bias. The IARC (International Agency for Research on Cancer) recently classified radio frequency electromagnetic fields as potentially carcinogenic to humans. Cellphones emit radio frequency electromagnetic fields.

A Danish study involving 420,095 Danish cellphone subscribers who were tracked from 1982 to 1995 and then again with follow-ups in 1996 and 2002, is the only cohort study to look into cellphone usage and cancer risk.

This large study was unable to find any link between long-term mobile phone usage and brain and nervous system tumors.

Researchers, led by the Institute of Cancer Epidemiology (part of the Danish Cancer Society) continued monitoring the cellphone subscribers up to 2007.

They focused on Danes aged at least 30 years who were born in Denmark after 1925. They divided them into two groups, those who had been subscribers since 1995 and people who had a cellphone before 1995. They gathered data from the Danish phone network operators as well as the Danish Cancer Register.

Below are some highlighted details of their findings: The authors concluded:

"The extended follow-up allowed us to investigate effects in people who had used mobile phones for 10 years or more, and this long-term use was not associated with higher risks of cancer.

However, as a small to moderate increase in risk for subgroups of heavy users or after even longer induction periods than 10-15 years cannot be ruled out, further studies with large study populations, where the potential for misclassification of exposure and selection bias is minimised, are warranted."

Accompanying Editorial

Professors Anders Ahlbom and Maria Feychting, from the Karolinska Institute, Sweden, wrote that this new study provides reassuring news. However, they added that monitoring of long-term cellphone users should continue.

They explained that this study has two key advantages over any previous ones: Written by Christian Nordqvist
Copyright: Medical News Today
Not to be reproduced without permission of Medical News Today

Visit our cancer / oncology section for the latest news on this subject.
"Use of mobile phones and risk of brain tumours: update of Danish cohort study"
Patrizia Frei, Aslak H Poulsen, Christoffer Johansen, Jørgen H Olsen, Marianne Steding-Jessen, Joachim Schüz
BMJ 2011; 343:d6387 doi: 10.1136/bmj.d6387 (Published 20 October 2011)
Please use one of the following formats to cite this article in your essay, paper or report:

MLA
Christian Nordqvist. "Cellphones Do Not Cause Tumors, Large Study Reports." Medical News Today. MediLexicon, Intl., 23 Oct. 2011. Web.
26 May. 2012. <http://www.medicalnewstoday.com/articles/236457.php>

APA
Christian Nordqvist. (2011, October 23). "Cellphones Do Not Cause Tumors, Large Study Reports." Medical News Today. Retrieved from
http://www.medicalnewstoday.com/articles/236457.php.

Please note: If no author information is provided, the source is cited instead.



Visitor Opinions (latest shown first)

Suggested evidence on cell phone use and brain cancer

posted by Gregory D. Pawelski on 24 Oct 2011 at 9:30 pm

The science of cancer causation associated with cell phones and related electromagnetic fields is ongoing. One fascinating presentation by investigators at Harvard has suggested piezoelectric rectification as the mechanism. When collagen and other biological tissues respond to these resonant frequencies, heat is released. Yet, the piezoelectric effect is a non-thermal energy effect that might better explain the carcinogenesis.

Examinations of cell phone electromagnetic fields suggest the penetration of the signal several centimeters into the brain. Sources of electromagnetic radiation can have serious consequences on our health. Life as we know it is dependent upon chemical energy. Influencing the charge and polarity of cells may adversely affect normal metabolism and signal transduction.

| post followup | alert a moderator |


The Danish Study is Flawed to its Core

posted by Andreas Moritz on 24 Oct 2011 at 2:11 pm

By looking at the Danish study, I can only say it is deceiving and flawed to its core.

1. They falsified the study period. For the study, the researchers used all persons who registered with the phone company and signed a contract between 1982 and 1995. However, the cell phone boom only began after 1996. All Danes who only began using a cell phone after 1996 were attributed to the group “nonusers”. This of course completely watered down the statistics in favor of harmlessness, when in reality the opposite is true. This is not just absurd but deliberate fraud.

2. About 200,000 contract users – who potentially could have been heavy users - were added to the list of nonusers simply because personal date of these contract users was not available. This, too, is fact manipulation and science fraud. Thus, altogether 36% all users in the population during this period fell into the category of nonusers! Call that “statistical evidence”! No wonder, they couldn’t find any significant evidence that cell phone users are at risk of developing brain tumors.

3. And it gets even more bizarre. Children and young people were not a part of the investigation, yet children and young adults are the most susceptible to cell phone radiation, and brain tumors among children and young adults have increased dramatically since cell phones became so popular among this age group.

4. Long-term effects of cell phone usage was not studied during this period of investigation. However, with the long latencies of a cancer development, this is one of the most crucial factors that need to be researched.

Even though, The Time magazine article mentioned major discrepancies in the study, the headline still told the world that there is no increased risk of cancer through cell phone use. It’s obvious that Time magazine rather prefers to keep its advertisers happy by letting the world know cell phones are safe than warn it with a headline like this: “Fraudulent study tries to tells us cell phones are safe when they are not”. Of course, this study was released just before the holiday shopping begins. A coincidence? The cell phone business is still one of the largest businesses in the world and public confidence is crucial for ensuring it’s expansion.

What’s strange is that the Danish study found an increased risk of a very rare form of Gliomas in the brain ventricles, but the study authors decided not to refer to this important result. Why didn’t they when this risk was also discovered by numerous other studies?

In other words, the study is pure junk science, but worse than that is the reporting of the media that it is a serious study we all can trust. Money still rules the world.

Andreas Moritz

| post followup | alert a moderator |


corporate cancer

posted by dadpasadena on 23 Oct 2011 at 9:46 am

The cigarette corporations lied to the public regarding the dangers of smoking. They too used "studies" to back their arguments... Cancer Societies have yet to find a cure for cancer, yet they can issue reports regarding cell phones safety. What used to be a novelty has become a necessity. Big business rules.

| post followup | alert a moderator |


Add Your Opinion On This Article

'Cellphones Do Not Cause Tumors, Large Study Reports'

Please note that we publish your name, but we do not publish your email address. It is only used to let you know when your message is published. We do not use it for any other purpose. Please see our privacy policy for more information.

If you write about specific medications or operations, please do not name health care professionals by name.

All opinions are moderated before being included (to stop spam)

Your Name:*
E-mail Address:*
Your Opinion Title:*
Opinion:*
This is to help prevent SPAM submissions. Please enter the words exactly as they appear, including capital letters and punctuation.*

* Fields marked with a * need to be filled in before you hit the submit button.

Contact Our News Editors

For any corrections of factual information, or to contact the editors please use our feedback form.

Please send any medical news or health news press releases to:

Note: Any medical information published on this website is not intended as a substitute for informed medical advice and you should not take any action before consulting with a health care professional. For more information, please read our terms and conditions.


Cancer / Oncology

What is Cancer?

Cancer is a class of diseases characterized by out-of-control cell growth. There are over 100 different types of cancer, and each is classified by the type of cell that is initially affected. Read more...

Most Popular Articles



Follow Our Cancer News On Twitter

Follow Us On Twitter
Get the latest news for this category delivered straight to your Twitter account. Simply visit our Cancer / Oncology Twitter account and select the 'follow' option.



View list of all 'What Is...' articles »