Following Canada's Common Drug Review Fewer Drugs Listed On Public Drug Plans But Faster Listing For Coverage
Editor's ChoiceAcademic Journal
Main Category: Pharmacy / Pharmacist
Article Date: 26 Oct 2011 - 10:00 PDT
| Patient / Public: | ![]() |
2 (1 votes) |
| Healthcare Prof: | ![]() |
A new study published in CMAJ discovered that, since the 2003 introduction of Canada's Common Drug Review, the number of drugs covered by public drug plans has considerably decreased.
There are 19 public drug plans in Canada. In 2010, these plans accounted for approximately 39% of the projected $31 billion in drug-related costs. The plans include the costs of a variety of drugs prescribed to individuals. Prior to 2003, each of the 19 plans independently analyzed evidence and cost-effectiveness for novel medications that were considered for being listed in the plans. The Canada Common Drug Review, managed by the Canadian Agency for Drugs and Technologies in Health, was launched in order to standardize the process, improve effectiveness by grouping resources and expertise as well as to terminate duplication. Quebec does not participate in the Common Drug Review.
Investigators from the University of Alberta discovered that the amount of drugs listed for coverage decreased considerably. Drug plans who participated in the study, listed between 47% and 66% of novel medications in the five years prior to the introduction of the Common Drug Review and between 12% and 40% in the five years after. In addition, they discovered that the time from being recommended for listing to actual listed date varied between 99 to 358 days, in comparison with a mean time-to-listing of 778 days (over 2 years), prior to the Common Drug Review.
Furthermore, they found that listing decisions of public drug plans and recommendations of the Common Drug Review varied significantly.
Dr. Dean Eurich, School of Public Health, University of Alberta, and team, explained:
"The proportion of drugs listed decreased significantly after the introduction of the Common Drug Review for all participating drug plans included in our analysis. Time-to-listing decreased for a number of the smaller provinces."
According to the researchers numerous factors may explain the decrease, such as uncertainty regarding how effective the medications submitted by pharmaceutical companies for review are in clinical trials.
They state:
"Our findings suggest that the Common Drug Review may have contributed to a streamlining of the process for reviewing drugs for certain jurisdictions. Specifically, patients in the provinces of New Brunswick, Prince Edward Island, and Newfoundland and Labrador may have benefited with earlier access to new drugs. Any substantial gains in savings or in the efficiency of publicly funded drug plans to make listing decisions are important factors in maintaining the health and safety of Canadian patients."
Written by Grace Rattue
Copyright: Medical News Today
Not to be reproduced without permission of Medical News Today
John-Michael Gamble et al.
CMAJ, October 24, 2011, doi: 10.1503/cmaj.110670
MLA
23 Feb. 2012. <http://www.medicalnewstoday.com/articles/236622.php>
APA
http://www.medicalnewstoday.com/articles/236622.php.
Please note: If no author information is provided, the source is cited instead.
|
Rate this article: (Hover over the stars then click to rate) |
Patient / Public: |
or |
Health Professional: |
Add Your Opinion
Please note that we publish your name, but we do not publish your email address. It is only used to let you know when your message is published. We do not use it for any other purpose. Please see our privacy policy for more information.
If you write about specific medications or operations, please do not name health care professionals by name.
All opinions are moderated before being included (to stop spam)
Contact Our News Editors
For any corrections of factual information, or to contact the editors please use our feedback form.
![]()
Please send any medical news or health news press releases to:
Note: Any medical information published on this website is not intended as a substitute for informed medical advice and you should not take any action before consulting with a health care professional. For more information, please read our terms and conditions.




