No Breast Cancer Screening For Women Aged 40-49, New Canadian Guidelines
Editor's ChoiceAcademic Journal
Main Category: Breast Cancer
Also Included In: Women's Health / Gynecology
Article Date: 21 Nov 2011 - 18:00 PST
'No Breast Cancer Screening For Women Aged 40-49, New Canadian Guidelines'
| Patient / Public: | ![]() |
3.13 (8 votes) |
| Healthcare Prof: | ![]() |
3 (3 votes) |
| Article opinions: | 5 posts |
Women aged forty to forty-nine should not undergo routine mammography screening for breast cancer, according to new guidelines issued by the Canadian Task Force on Preventive Health Care, which were published in CMAJ (Canadian Medical Association Journal). The Task Force also recommends that the screening interval be extended to every two to three years for females aged 50 to 74, from every two years.
Women should not carry out clinical breast exams and breast self-examinations if they have no symptoms pointing to breast cancer, the guidelines also recommend.
The new recommendations are directed at doctors and policy-makers, and provide guidance on mammography, MRI scans, clinical breast exams by doctors, and breast self-exams. They specifically focus on females in three age groups - 40 to 49, 50 to 59 and 70 to 74 years - and who neither have a history of breast cancer nor a family history with a close relative with the disease. A close relative means mother, sister or daughter.
Dr. Marcello Tonelli, Chair of the Task Force on Preventive Health Care and Associate Professor at the University of Alberta, Department of Medicine, in Edmonton, Alberta, said:
"As the Guideline on Breast Cancer Screening was last updated in 2001 and breast cancer screening has since become a subject for discussion amongst doctors and patients, the revitalized Canadian Task Force selected breast cancer screening as the topic for its first guideline.
We intend that this Guideline, which reflects the latest scientific evidence in breast cancer screening, be used to guide physicians and their patients regarding the optimum use of mammograms and breast examination."
The guideline says that a better balance is required between the harms and costs of overdiagnosis, overtreatment, and false positives and the outcomes of breast cancer screening with regard to tumor detection and mortality. Several recent studies have shown that routine breast cancer screening during middle age do not impact on mortality rates enough to outweigh the negative consequences of them.
Screenings that come up with a false-positive result can seriously impact on the patient's and her family's well-being, causing disruption and extra costs; they also use up resources of the health care system.
Dr. Tonelli said:
"Providing Canadians with guidelines that reflect the most current scientific evidence is our priority. We encourage every woman to discuss the risks and benefits of screening with their doctor before deciding on the best approach for them."
Below are the main recommendations:
- As the risk of cancer is very low for women aged 40-49, and the risks of overdiagnosis, overtreatment and false-positives are relatively high, there should be no routine mammography for this age group
- Women aged 50 to 69 years - routine screening should occur every two to three years
- Women aged 70 to 74 years - routine screening should occur every two to three years
- Average risk women should have no MRI screening
- There should be no routine clinical breast exams by doctors
- There should be no breast self-exams to screen for breast cancer
"There was no evidence that screening with mammography reduces the risk of all-cause mortality. Although screening might permit surgery for breast cancer at an earlier stage than diagnosis of clinically evident cancer (thus permitting the use of less invasive procedures for some women), available trial data suggest that the overall risk of mastectomy is significantly increased among recipients of screening compared with women who have not undergone screening."
The Canadian Task Force on Preventive Health Care consists of 14 primary care and prevention experts - it is an independent body. It was established by the Public Health Agency of Canada to "develop clinical practice guidelines that support primary care providers in delivering preventive health care".
In a Commentary piece in the same journal, Dr. Peter Gøtzsche, Nordic Cochrane Centre, Copenhagen, Denmark, remarks:
"These guidelines are more balanced and more in accordance with the evidence than any previous recommendations."
Gøtzsche explains that there is no evidence supporting the use of routine mammography screening, he says it is ineffective at best, and also harmful because the "diagnosis of cancers that would otherwise be undetected lead to life-shortening treatments and mastectomies".
Dr. Gøtzsche wrote:
"The main effect of screening is to produce patients with breast cancer from among healthy women who would have remained free of breast disease for the rest of their lives had they not undergone screening.
(conclusion) The best method we have to reduce the risk of breast cancer is to stop the screening program," he concludes. "This could reduce the risk by one-third in the screened age group, as the level of overdiagnosis in countries with organized screening programs is about 50%."
Written by Christian Nordqvist
Copyright: Medical News Today
Not to be reproduced without permission of Medical News Today
The Canadian Task Force on Preventive Health Care
CMAJ November 22, 2011 vol. 183 no. 17 doi: 10.1503/cmaj.110334
MLA
26 May. 2012. <http://www.medicalnewstoday.com/articles/238021.php>
APA
http://www.medicalnewstoday.com/articles/238021.php.
Please note: If no author information is provided, the source is cited instead.
Visitor Opinions (latest shown first)
Zaphiro Moda
posted by Amanda Farries on 12 Dec 2011 at 7:49 amI am in my 30's and have breast cancer. I am terminal. This article made me cry - this is not the answer. This mentality is what has killed me. Even though I went to the doctor almost every month for years saying there was something wrong, cancer was not looked for, or considered even, because I was too young. The ones who contract it young are the ones who are dying!
Throwing Baby out with bathwater.
posted by Elspeth on 25 Nov 2011 at 12:04 pmTo eliminate self exams and clinical (doctor) exams is going too far. According to the research, most tumors are discovered relatively early on by the women and/or the doctors using the manual breast exam. Eliminate this and there will be women with cancers that will have grown and possibly metastisized, which could have been caught if manual breast exams were used. As for screening mammography, I would much rather have false positive results than have tumors left undetected. I've been having screening mammograms since I was 40 - I've had 3 false positives, and 1 actual positive (intraductal carcinoma, when I was 42) which may not have been caught otherwise.
IMO ending all screening mammograms and clinical manual exams are just a cost cutting measure that will result in more women having advanced cancer that could otherwise have been caught and treated successfully. Makes me wonder how many women were involved with this decision, and if any of the decision makers had ever had cancer.
Question on Breast Cancer Screening
posted by Cheryl Chapman on 22 Nov 2011 at 5:48 amTherefore, if you have breast cancer directly, however, you do not show any such symptoms and have always had a clean mamogram-- you should or should not continue with the screenings. What I read in your article was that you should continue annually since it is in your immediate family....
No Breast screening
posted by Yvonne Cantin on 22 Nov 2011 at 5:46 amI am a survivor, as is my daughter,the mother 0f 2 small children. So, if you don't screen & women start dying, that's OK Whatever happened to Preventative medicine is the way to go? Ask all the brave women who raise millions each year for research into Breast cancer, how they feel about this.
shame-shame- shame
posted by keithwatson on 21 Nov 2011 at 7:14 pmi now understand why my canadian friends are dying of breast cancer,ladies beware your government is NOT acting in your best interest,these are shameful cost saving recommendations
Add Your Opinion On This Article
'No Breast Cancer Screening For Women Aged 40-49, New Canadian Guidelines'Please note that we publish your name, but we do not publish your email address. It is only used to let you know when your message is published. We do not use it for any other purpose. Please see our privacy policy for more information.
If you write about specific medications or operations, please do not name health care professionals by name.
All opinions are moderated before being included (to stop spam)
Contact Our News Editors
For any corrections of factual information, or to contact the editors please use our feedback form.
![]()
Please send any medical news or health news press releases to:
Note: Any medical information published on this website is not intended as a substitute for informed medical advice and you should not take any action before consulting with a health care professional. For more information, please read our terms and conditions.





