Weight Loss Undermined By Mid-Morning Snacks
Editor's ChoiceAcademic Journal
Main Category: Obesity / Weight Loss / Fitness
Also Included In: Nutrition / Diet
Article Date: 28 Nov 2011 - 19:00 PST
'Weight Loss Undermined By Mid-Morning Snacks'
| Patient / Public: | ![]() |
|
| Healthcare Prof: | ![]() |
3.25 (8 votes) |
| Article opinions: | 9 posts |
Adult females who are dieting in order to lose weight, may find their pounds come off much more slowly if they have a snack between their breakfast and lunch, researchers from the Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center reported in the Journal of the American Dietetic Association. The authors suggest that a dietary weight-loss intervention should carefully consider the effects of timing, frequency, and snack quality on weight loss.
Anne McTiernan, M.D., Ph.D. and team carried out a 12-month long study and found that dieters who ate a healthy breakfast which was not followed by a mid-morning snack lost an average of 11% of their bodyweight, compared to only 7% for women who did snack between breakfast and lunch. In this study, a snack is any food or drink that is eaten or drunk between meals.
McTiernan said:
"We think this finding may not relate necessarily to the time of day one snacks, but rather to the short interval between breakfast and lunch. Mid-morning snacking therefore might be a reflection of recreational or mindless eating habits rather than eating to satisfy true hunger."
Timing is important, McTiernan added. Snack too close to a meal, and you can sabotage your weight-loss plan, but having too long an interval between meals can also be bad if you want to lose weight.
McTiernan said:
"Snacking could be part of a dieter's toolkit if they're eating in response to true hunger. Individuals should determine if they experience long intervals - such as more than five hours - between meals. Adding a snack might help people deal better with hunger and ultimately help them to make more sound choices at their next meal."
Some snacks can be unhealthy and ruin a weight-loss plan
The researchers discovered other surprising facts:
- Women who say they have at least two snacks per day generally consume more fiber than others
- Women who snack in the afternoon tend to consume a higher daily quantity of fruit and vegetables than those who do not nibble between lunch and supper
- Diet alone group - the aim was to consume between 1,200 to 2,000 calories per day, depending on their weight at baseline, with less than 30% of their daily calorie intake coming from fat
- Diet plus exercise group - the same as above, plus five days per week of 45 minutes of moderate-to-vigorous exercise
The participants had to record at what time of day they ate, as well as the percentage of calories from fat, fiber, and fruit and vegetables (a food-frequency questionnaire was used to make an estimate).
McTiernan said:
"Many people think that a weight-loss program has to mean always feeling hungry. Our study suggests that snacking may actually help with weight loss if not done too close to another meal, particularly if the snacks are healthy foods that can help you feel full without adding too many calories."
The authors explained that several studies have shown that approximately 97% of Americans snack. Snacking is an American behavior that is widespread throughout all age groups. According to one survey which randomly questioned 1,500 adults, the most common snacks include crunchy and salty foods, such as nuts, pretzels, and potato chips, as well as cakes and cookies. Fruit and ice-cream are also very popular snacks.
Females who snack in the afternoon generally eat more fruit and vegetables than other women
The authors explain that "empty-calorie snacks", such as sugary drinks and potato chips can seriously undermine any weight-loss plan.
McTiernan explained:
"Since women on a weight-loss program only have a limited number of calories to spend each day, it is important for them to incorporate nutrient-dense foods that are no more than 200 calories per serving. The best snacks for a weight-loss program are proteins such as low-fat yogurt, string cheese, or a small handful of nuts; non-starchy vegetables; fresh fruits; whole-grain crackers; and non-calorie beverages such as water, coffee and tea."
In an Abstract in the journal, the authors concluded:
"These results suggest that snack meals can be a source for additional fruits, vegetables, and fiber-rich foods; however, snacking patterns might also reflect unhealthy eating habits and impede weight-loss progress. Future dietary weight-loss interventions should evaluate the effects of timing, frequency, and quality of snacks on weight loss."
Written by Christian Nordqvist
Copyright: Medical News Today
Not to be reproduced without permission of Medical News Today
Angela Kong, PhD, RD, Shirley A.A. Beresford, PhD, Catherine M. Alfano, PhD, Karen E. Foster-Schubert, MD, Marian L. Neuhouser, PhD, RD, Donna B. Johnson, PhD, RD, Catherine Duggan, PhD, Ching-Yun Wang, PhD, Liren Xiao, MS, Carolyn E. Bain, MPH, and Anne McTiernan, MD, PhD
Journal of the American Dietetic Association Volume 111, Issue 12 , Pages 1898-1903, December 2011
MLA
26 May. 2012. <http://www.medicalnewstoday.com/articles/238320.php>
APA
http://www.medicalnewstoday.com/articles/238320.php.
Please note: If no author information is provided, the source is cited instead.
Visitor Opinions (latest shown first)
Where do
posted by Myron Gaines on 30 Nov 2011 at 4:26 pmEating less food in general is better for the over weight. It just feels good mayne.
healthy snacking
posted by dave westwood on 29 Nov 2011 at 5:36 amI agree, most people work long hours and assuming everyone works 9-12 ie 3hrs between meals, one does not need a snack. More likely up at 0600 then healthy breakfast, snack around 9.00-10.00 then lunch around 12.30-13.30 - then snack in the afternoon, as one's dinner is probably after 1800.
Therefore, an intake of healthy food approx every 3 hrs ensures stable blood sugar levels, no spikes in insulin and hunger should be non-existent.
For the average working person I advise 1-2 healthy snacks every day to break-up those long durations of no food.
Previously obese woman
posted by julie on 29 Nov 2011 at 5:23 amI eat breakfast between 5:30 and 7, lunch around noon, dinner around 7 or 8. If I eat a big high fat meal, I don't have to snack. I don't mind snacking, though, mostly it's fruit. But, obviously not only does the need to snack and any resulting weight effects depend on how far apart your meals are, but also how big/heavy they are, what your snacks are, how active you are, etc. If I do a lot of snacking because I can't resist the cookies and candy I find left around the office, I will probably gain weight, but if I eat some fruit or nuts or jerky because my last meal wore off and it's a few hours until the next one, I'm likely losing weight.
Not quite
posted by Ryan Parker on 29 Nov 2011 at 3:23 amTo me it depends on two important factors. A blanket statement to say that those who snack mid morning will get fat is a bit hard to swallow. The two factors are:
- What is the snack (calories, fiber etc.);
- Planned or unplanned.
It has been long established that eating many small meals throughout the day while keeping a hawk-eye on calories is a effective way to ramp up metabolism and thus weight loss.
If however the person is just eating out of boredom then it is certainly likely that they are sabotaging their weight loss attempts.
Ryan Parker
Zdiets.net - Lost 170lbs - Hypertension GONE! - High Cholesterol GONE!
Lose weight by eating for less time
posted by Bob Marsden on 29 Nov 2011 at 12:43 amIt seems to be in the nature of many bodily systems that they shift between on-functioning and off-restoring.
So when the metabolism is in digestive mode it extracts and stores, thus converting food into body weight. In non-digestive, active mode it draws out from stores and uses, thus reducing body weight. So there’s a simple relationship between the proportion of time spent in digestive mode and weight gain, and a simple relation between proportion of time in active mode and weight loss. Snacking makes you heavy; fasting makes you light. For the same proportion of time spent digesting there’s a relation between the nature of the food consumed and weight gain. Foods vary in their extractive potential - concentrated carbohydrates, proteins, fats differ in how much nutritive weight the digestive system can extract, and increased bulk of consuming multiplies the extractive mass.
Managing an eating schedule is said to depend on hunger (the feeling of eating-readiness) and appetite (the seeking out and getting the food to be eaten). These are markers of diurnal metabolic expectation, and can be changed easily by habit learning. Cut a meal or change its time and you will experience active expectation when it used to be. After four to ten days the system will have learned the new regime and will have changed its expectations.There may be occasional reversions. You might find you have unknowingly sought out, acquired and started eating something at the old time. If you subsequently catch yourself with the tendency and deny it, it will stop. If you don’t, the expectation and its fulfilment will be re-established.
Timing is key
posted by Jenny Tschiesche on 28 Nov 2011 at 10:32 pmI agree with the first comment. Very few of my clients eat breakfast as late as 9am. Most would have had their breakfast by 7.30am. If they get hungry between breakfast and lunch I advise a snack which combines both carbohydrate and protein ie an apple and some nuts or a yogurt with sunflower seeds. They can always have lunch a little later if need be.
So eating less helps to lose weight?
posted by bob on 28 Nov 2011 at 9:26 pmWomen who eat less snacks gain less weight. That doesn't seem like "news."
I agree wholeheartedly
posted by Ursula Bangor on 28 Nov 2011 at 8:57 pmI find that if I eat a good breakfast, don't snack mid-morning, it works a lot better. So do most of my friends.
Malarkey
posted by Diana on 28 Nov 2011 at 7:44 pmI eat breakfast at 6Am and lunch at 12:30, that is 6.5 hours. I snack on an apple or whole grain crackers with almond butter about 10:00AM and I am losing weight quite effectively. You articles seems to point to a woman who eats breakfast at 9 and lunch at noon, which is too short a time. Try to get facts and time frames correct before you make a blanket commen.
Add Your Opinion On This Article
'Weight Loss Undermined By Mid-Morning Snacks'Please note that we publish your name, but we do not publish your email address. It is only used to let you know when your message is published. We do not use it for any other purpose. Please see our privacy policy for more information.
If you write about specific medications or operations, please do not name health care professionals by name.
All opinions are moderated before being included (to stop spam)
Contact Our News Editors
For any corrections of factual information, or to contact the editors please use our feedback form.
![]()
Please send any medical news or health news press releases to:
Note: Any medical information published on this website is not intended as a substitute for informed medical advice and you should not take any action before consulting with a health care professional. For more information, please read our terms and conditions.







