Cancer Screening In Older Patients Very Common
Editor's ChoiceAcademic Journal
Main Category: Cancer / Oncology
Also Included In: Seniors / Aging
Article Date: 13 Dec 2011 - 0:00 PST
'Cancer Screening In Older Patients Very Common'
| Patient / Public: | ![]() |
|
| Healthcare Prof: | ![]() |
4.33 (3 votes) |
| Article opinions: | 5 posts |
U.S. Preventive Services Task Force guidelines recommend against routine cancer screening, especially for breast, cervical, colorectal and prostate cancer, but adults 75 and older are still receiving regular cancer screenings. The report published in the December 12/26 issue of Archives of Internal Medicine, one of the JAMA/Archives journals, is a part of the journal's Less is More series, the aim is to educate healthcare professionals and patients alike in cuttings costs, but having a better service at the same time.
The authors write as background information in the article :
"In the United States, the number of adults 65 years or older, currently estimated at 36.8 million, is expected to double by the year 2030. Providing high-quality care to this growing population while attempting to contain costs will pose a significant challenge ...While a great deal is known about cancer screening behaviors and trends in young and middle-aged adults, less is known about screening behaviors in older adults from different racial backgrounds."
Keith M. Bellizzi, Ph.D., M.P.H., of the University of Connecticut, Storrs, and colleagues analyzed data from the National Health Interview Survey, an annual in-person nationwide survey used to track health trends in U.S. citizens, to estimate the prevalence of cancer screening among older, racially diverse adults. The study population included 49,575 individuals, 1,697 of whom were 75 to 79 years of age and 2,376 were 80 years of age and older.
Percentages of those reporting cancer screenings are as follows :
- 62 percent Women age 75 to 79 - A mammogram within the past two years.
- 50 percent of women age 80 and older - A mammogram within the past two years.
- 53 percent of women ages 75 to 79 - A Papanicolaou screen (also known as a pap smear or pap test) for cervical cancer within the past three years.
- 38 percent of women ages 80 and older - A pap smear within the past three years.
- 57 percent highest of men and women 75 to 79 - Screenings for colorectal cancer.
- 57 percent of Men 75-79 - Prostate cancer screening.
- 42 percent of Men 80 and older - Prostate cancer screening.
- 40 percent of Men 50-74 and older - Prostate cancer screening
Individuals without a high school diploma were significantly less likely to be screened for breast, cervical and prostate cancer, compared with adults older than 75 years with a college degree. Adults older than 75 years were also significantly more likely to be screened for breast, colorectal, and prostate cancer if a physician recommended the test.
The authors concluded :
"A high percentage of older adults continue to be screened in the face of ambiguity of recommendations for this group ... Prevalence results from this study can serve as a benchmark for progress as we move the science of cancer screening in older, diverse adults forward."
In additional commentary, Louise C. Walter, M.D., of the University of California, San Francisco and San Francisco Veterans Affairs Medical Center, writes that :
"There are no quality measures that address appropriate target rates for cancer screening in persons older than 75 years ...
While at extremes in older age the likelihood of surviving long enough to benefit from potential detection and treatment of asymptomatic cancer becomes quite small and the likelihood of harm becomes quite large irrespective of other factors, Bellizzi et al were not able to calculate screening rates in subgroups older than 85 years owing to the small number participating in the survey ...
Still, the data by Bellizzi et al raise the issue of whether quality measures should address the overuse of cancer screening."
Dr. Walter concludes :
"While it is useful to determine screening rates among persons in whom screening will likely result in net benefit or net harm, between these two groups is a large number of older persons in whom screening offers small or uncertain net benefit ...Written by Rupert Shepherd
For these persons, the decision about whether the potential benefits of screening outweigh the risks is a value judgment that requires informed decision-making ...
While arguments persists about what is the 'right' rate of cancer screening in older persons, it seems clear that the rate of informed decision-making should approach 100 percent."
Copyright: Medical News Today
Not to be reproduced without permission of Medical News Today
Arch Intern Med. 2011;171[22]:2037-2038.
MLA
26 May. 2012. <http://www.medicalnewstoday.com/articles/239052.php>
APA
http://www.medicalnewstoday.com/articles/239052.php.
Please note: If no author information is provided, the source is cited instead.
Visitor Opinions (latest shown first)
agree
posted by Marc Schneiderman MD on 3 Mar 2012 at 4:16 amWhat the Preventive Tast Force(s) do not take into account is patient/family satisfaction. If I miss breast cancer in a 75 year old, their children/patient/etc. will loose faith in my as their PCP. And, although there may not be a big med-mal payout, a malpractice suit, regardless of how small, is a horrible experience. I agree with the poster on this that the med-mal and patient faith is a large factor in why we order presumed worthless screens.
faulty premise - cancer screening
posted by j siegel on 29 Dec 2011 at 5:43 amCancer screening in the elderly should be common and not merely be based on chronological age. I agree that other factors such as physical, medical, functional status, and other factors should be used.
Unfortunately, I think there is a misleading premise that continues in medicine (e.g. "show me the data") that research using past data SHOULD be used to extrapolate and be used (whether by government, insurance company, clinicians, etc) to predict or guide future evaluation and management of patients especially elderly. It fails to consider the internet, improved technology, shared knowledge, international travel, and industry advances that have been made. We as clinicians must continue to balance and even "ration" care as we have always done using our best data and experience. Unfortunately we continue to have imperfect data and therefore decision making must be done on an individualized basis between doctor and patient acknowledging our imperfect system.
As noted, this is nothing new. The business arena and stock and mutual fund market constantly reminds us of this using standard disclaimers that historical results do not necessarily predict future returns. We, in medicine, need to be more aware of this.
cancer screening on elderly
posted by eduardo lu on 26 Dec 2011 at 3:53 amif i am 70 years of age and not screen for cancer and i develope cancer because i was not screened due to my age you mean to say that my life expectancy is dependent on cancer survival . i think there should not be a generalization of when cancer screening should not be done this must depend on the physical and mental status of a patient and age should not be the sole deciding factor .
Living to 90 or more
posted by Kathy Ray on 14 Dec 2011 at 11:29 amAn older person could easily live to ninety or more these days and still be productive. Yet this panel's recommendation could cause a person to suffer an earlier than necessary death due to not being screened for these cancers. I had bilateral mastectomies for breast cancer at age 66 and am now 70 with no other serious diseases. My father lived into his nineties in good health. I might live that long too. But what if I were 70 and had not been screened. My life would probably be cut short. Every case is different and should be judged as such.
The elephant under the drug
posted by Bert KUMMEL on 13 Dec 2011 at 3:29 pmTry telling a malpractice lawyer why yuou did not screen his client for cancer.
Add Your Opinion On This Article
'Cancer Screening In Older Patients Very Common'Please note that we publish your name, but we do not publish your email address. It is only used to let you know when your message is published. We do not use it for any other purpose. Please see our privacy policy for more information.
If you write about specific medications or operations, please do not name health care professionals by name.
All opinions are moderated before being included (to stop spam)
Contact Our News Editors
For any corrections of factual information, or to contact the editors please use our feedback form.
![]()
Please send any medical news or health news press releases to:
Note: Any medical information published on this website is not intended as a substitute for informed medical advice and you should not take any action before consulting with a health care professional. For more information, please read our terms and conditions.




