Smoking Marijuana Not Bad For The Lungs
Editor's ChoiceAcademic Journal
Main Category: Respiratory / Asthma
Also Included In: Alcohol / Addiction / Illegal Drugs; Smoking / Quit Smoking
Article Date: 10 Jan 2012 - 21:00 PST
| Patient / Public: | ![]() |
3.93 (14 votes) |
| Healthcare Prof: | ![]() |
4 (5 votes) |
| Article Opinions: | 10 posts |
Journal of the American Medical Association put a dent in the arguments against Marijuana smoking today, with release of a new report showing casual pot smokers might even have stronger lungs than non smokers.
Researchers say that there is good evidence that occasional marijuana use can cause an increase in lung airflow rates and lung volume. Volume is measured as the total amount of air a person can blow out after taking the deepest breath they can.
The study, which was carried out by The University of California, San Francisco, and The University of Alabama at Birmingham, spans over more than two decades and involves more than 5000 men and women, in four American cities : Birmingham, Chicago, Oakland, Calif., and Minneapolis.
One of the study's co-authors, Stefan Kertesz commented :
"At levels of marijuana exposure commonly seen in Americans, occasional marijuana use was associated with increases in lung air flow rates and increases in lung capacity ... With marijuana use increasing and large numbers of people who have been and continue to be exposed, knowing whether it causes lasting damage to lung function is important for public-health messaging and medical use of marijuana."
He continues that even at daily usage levels of one joint per day over seven years, people were not seeming to have any degradation of lung capacity or function.
The authors factored in for people who smoked tobacco and those that lived in more polluted areas with lesser air quality. The harm from cigarettes showed up clearly while those smoking a joint a day and not smoking tobacco did not show the degradation. Even one joint per week for twenty years did not appear to have significant effect.
Its not known exactly why tobacco appears to be so much more harmful than marijuana, especially considering the contents of the smoke are similar. It is known that THC, one of the main active cannabis oils in the herb, has anti inflammatory properties that may help to soothe the lungs. A part of the increased capacity was put down to the way pot smokers usually take deep breaths when they smoke, but one joint per day is hardly giving your lungs great exercise.
Obviously more research is needed, and it would be interesting to see results of lung tests in communities such as Jamaica and the Himalayas where smoking pot is endemic and done in larger daily volumes.
Written by Rupert Shepherd
Copyright: Medical News Today
Not to be reproduced without permission of Medical News Today
MLA
23 Feb. 2012. <http://www.medicalnewstoday.com/articles/240146.php>
APA
http://www.medicalnewstoday.com/articles/240146.php.
Please note: If no author information is provided, the source is cited instead.
|
Rate this article: (Hover over the stars then click to rate) |
Patient / Public: |
or |
Health Professional: |
Visitor Opinions In Chronological Order (10)
Silly science (marijuana vs. tobacco)
posted by Vlady Rozenbaum on 11 Jan 2012 at 9:07 amI have never been a smoker of either of theses substances, but I would like to see a comparison of marijuana users smoking several packs of joints a day with cigarette users smoking several packs of cigarettes a day. I think that the conclusions will be quite different.
I actually know why tobacco is more harmful
posted by Rain Wilber on 11 Jan 2012 at 9:46 amAs been a smoker of both dried plants, I can say with assurance that the tabacco plant is much difference in flame movement and heat generation per bowl pack... Take the case of tobacco: It is highly flammable, to the point that after having lighted the bowl for a big inhale, the bowl remains light for up to several minutes without needing to draw air for a fresh fire (same with cigarette to some extent). Light a bowl of marijuana on fire, and it stays light for less than one minute! So, with the tobacco, you have this highly flammable substance, literally pouring toxic fumes straight into your lungs at high energy levels (because of the high heat flame). Trust me, I know all this by intuition, before science has yet to publicly reveal such an understanding.
tobacco vs Marijuana
posted by Pierre on 11 Jan 2012 at 11:01 amI think, in fact im sure, the reason tobacco is more harmful than marijuana is the 300+ toxins that are added by tobacco companies.
Vote Teapot and PASS It!
posted by Brandt Hardin on 11 Jan 2012 at 11:35 amMarijuana is the safest drug with actual benefits for the user as opposed to alcohol which is dangerous, causes addiction, birth defects, and affects literally every organ in the body. Groups are organizing all over the country to speak their minds on reforming pot laws. I drew up a very cool poster featuring Uncle Willie Nelson and The Teapot Party for the cause which you can check out on my artist’s blog at dregstudiosart.blogspot.com/2011/01/vote-teapot-2011.html
More research anybody?
posted by malcolm kyle on 12 Jan 2012 at 7:41 am1) Tobacco is cancer causing largely because it delivers specific carcinogens such as NNK and NNAL that are not present in cannabis. Not all "tar" is created equal, and tobacco has some of the most carcinogenic types of tar known to science, whereas cannabis does not.
http://jnci.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/full/91/14/1194
2) Cannabis (marijuana) use is associated with a DECREASE in several types of cancer... potentially even providing a protective effect against tobacco and alcohol related cancer development.
Donald Tashkin, a UCLA researcher whose work is funded by NIDA, did a case-control study comparing 1,200 patients with lung, head and neck cancers to a matched group with no cancer. Even the heaviest marijuana smokers had no increased risk of cancer, and had somewhat lower cancer risk than non-smokers (tobacco smokers had a 20-fold increased lung cancer risk). Tashkin D. Marijuana Use and Lung Cancer: Results of a Case-Control Study. American Thoracic Society International Conference. May 23, 2006.
Researchers at the Kaiser-Permanente HMO, funded by NIDA, followed 65,000 patients for nearly a decade, comparing cancer rates among non-smokers, tobacco smokers, and marijuana smokers. Tobacco smokers had massively higher rates of lung cancer and other cancers. Marijuana smokers who didn't also use tobacco had no increase in risk of tobacco-related cancers or of cancer risk overall. In fact their rates of lung and most other cancers were slightly lower than non-smokers, though the difference did not reach statistical significance. Sidney, S. et al. Marijuana Use and Cancer Incidence (California, United States). Cancer Causes and Control. Vol. 8. Sept. 1997, p. 722-728.
pot screwed my lungs up.
posted by bron on 16 Jan 2012 at 2:12 ami find these conclusions very questionable, especially in regard to the still developing lungs of adolescents,a topic not mentioned, even tho adolescent use is supposedly at a 30 year high.
(pun unintended) i believe i incurred damage to my lungs,having started with pot at age 14.this should be mentioned, as pot is used by more youngsters than in the past.
So many people smoke.
posted by Mc Ärjagsnabb on 17 Jan 2012 at 10:05 amYet, the only readily available product on the market is the monopolised cigarettes, or other tobacco products.
And the tobacco plant is SO NOT ecological.
I've smoked waterpipe and cigarettes.
The only reason why i've smoked cigarettes, is because my friends started (even though i objected to it at first) because it's readily available everywhere, and because i dont fear getting roughed up and robbed of my freedom when smoking it.
Pot, marijuana or skunk hasn't been available to me, not even in the "sub" market.
Mainly resin has been so, for obvious reason (compact)
But the resin HAS to be mixed with the toxic tobacco, which 'we' get from cigarettes that we've toasted first, only to get rid of ther worst toxins and bad taste.
It is hard for me to grasp why such basic knowledge as the findings in this report, come as a surprise to mainstream media.
It ought to be a widely known fact.
It all comes back to one very serious problem.
Legislation.
If the logic behind forbidding cannabisproducts was universal, both beer, wine, coffee, cigarettes, waterpipe tobacco, cigars, driving cars etc..
Was to be illegal.
There is no doubt in my mind.
Forbidding cannabis is wrong.
Ridding the need for it would be a good thing.
Just as it would be for alcohol, tobacco, driving cars aso aso.
Cannabis hasn't ruined my life. But the prejudices about cannabis has troubled my relation to the part of my community that has no relation to cannabisproducts.
MARJUANA DEOS NOT HURT OR KILL
posted by lolsmileyface299 on 7 Feb 2012 at 7:18 ami think that marjuana deosnt kill or hurt cuz marjuana is a herb and a flower. it is mafe on earth MOTHER NATURE god made it so smoke it
Lol
posted by Anon on 7 Feb 2012 at 7:45 amLol by that reasoning deadly nightshade is perfectly safe too :-D Just because something is "natural" doesn't make it good for you or safe... and when was burning something and inhaling it best for you???
Yeah Right!!
posted by Mike on 13 Feb 2012 at 11:16 pmThis is stupid the average marijuana smokers inhales the equivalent of about 10 cigarettes per day or 3 joints or 3 bowls. Look at the resin in and marijuana piper it's obvious it's bad. Cancer causing chemicals beside it damages the lungs causes emphysema and limits the lungfs ability to absorb oxygen. If you took a tobacco smoker who smoked 2 cigarettes a day it would be the same thing magically the study would conclude tobacco is harmless. People who do these studies are backwards in their thinking and highly illogical.
Add Your Opinion
Please note that we publish your name, but we do not publish your email address. It is only used to let you know when your message is published. We do not use it for any other purpose. Please see our privacy policy for more information.
If you write about specific medications or operations, please do not name health care professionals by name.
All opinions are moderated before being included (to stop spam)
Contact Our News Editors
For any corrections of factual information, or to contact the editors please use our feedback form.
![]()
Please send any medical news or health news press releases to:
Note: Any medical information published on this website is not intended as a substitute for informed medical advice and you should not take any action before consulting with a health care professional. For more information, please read our terms and conditions.




