Researcher Who Studied Benefits Of Red Wine Falsified Data Says University
Featured ArticleMain Category: Litigation / Medical Malpractice
Also Included In: Nutrition / Diet
Article Date: 12 Jan 2012 - 2:00 PST
| Patient / Public: | ![]() |
3.95 (19 votes) |
| Healthcare Prof: | ![]() |
3.92 (12 votes) |
| Article Opinions: | 11 posts |
An extensive misconduct investigation that took three years to complete and produced a 60,000-page report, concludes that a researcher who has come to prominence in recent years for his investigations into the beneficial properties of resveratrol, a compound found in red wine, "is guilty of 145 counts of fabrication and falsification of data".
In a statement published on the university's news website on Wednesday, the University of Connecticut (UConn) Health Center said the investigation has led them to inform 11 scientific journals that had published studies conducted by Dr Dipak K. Das, a professor in the unversity's Department of Surgery and director of its Cardiovascular Research Center.
The internal investigation, which covered seven years of work in Das's lab, was triggered by an anonyomous allegation of "research irregularities" in 2008.
Das has been in UConn's employ since 1984, and was awarded tenure in 1993.
UConn Health Center said it worked closely with the US Office of Research Integrity (ORI) throughout its internal investigation. ORI have received the report, and they will now conduct an independent investigation.
Inquiries involving former members of the lab are still under way, and no findings have been released as yet.
All externally funded research in Das's lab is now frozen, and the Health Center has declined nearly $900,000 in federal grants awarded to Das.
Philip Austin, UConn's interim vice president for health affairs, said:
"We have a responsibility to correct the scientific record and inform peer researchers across the country."
He expressed gratitude to the individual who "chose to do the right thing" and alert the university authorities about the irregularities.
UConn has initiated dismissal proceedings, in accordance with the unversity's bylaws.
Austin said while the university authorities are "deeply disappointed by the flagrant disregard" for the university's code of conduct, they are "pleased the oversight systems in place were effective and worked as intended".
He said the abuses in Das's lab are not representative of the overall quality of UConn Health Center's biomedical research, which "continues to pursue advances in treatments and cures with the utmost integrity".
The 11 journals that UConn has informed are: American Journal of Physiology - Heart & Circulatory; Antioxidants & Redox Signaling; Cellular Physiology & Biochemistry; Free Radical Biology; Free Radical Research; Journal of Agriculture and Food Chemistry; Journal of Cellular & Molecular Medicine; Journal of Nutritional Biochemistry; Journal of Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics; Molecular & Cellular Cardiology; Molecular & Cellular Chemistry.
There is a suggestion that the impact of this news on resveratrol research will be minimal.
According to a report from the Associated Press (AP), Dr Nir Barzilai, whose team conducts resveratrol research at the Albert Einstein College of Medicine in New York, says Das is not a major player in the field.
Barzilai told AP lots of labs around the world are conducting extensive research into resveratrol, with encouraging results, and the new allegation will not make a material difference.
Written by Catharine Paddock PhD
Copyright: Medical News Today
Not to be reproduced without permission of Medical News Today
MLA
23 Feb. 2012. <http://www.medicalnewstoday.com/articles/240222.php>
APA
http://www.medicalnewstoday.com/articles/240222.php.
Please note: If no author information is provided, the source is cited instead.
|
Rate this article: (Hover over the stars then click to rate) |
Patient / Public: |
or |
Health Professional: |
Visitor Opinions In Chronological Order (11)
Only ONE can't kill.
posted by Jillian Galloway on 12 Jan 2012 at 6:40 amChardonnay, Cabernet, Merlot, Cannabis – only ONE of these lacks the ability to kill you. Alcohol consumers deserve the right to switch to the FAR safer recreational drug, Cannabis.
False again!!!
posted by Freddie Einstein on 12 Jan 2012 at 6:59 amSo why write the stupid article in the 1st place?? !!!
Cannabis defies biochemistry?
posted by Matt on 12 Jan 2012 at 10:52 am@Jillian Galloway
Really? So I can eat as many pot brownies as I can't possibly overdose?
I was not aware that THC is non-toxic at all doses. This surprises me because even water is toxic at some dose.
I'm all for complete legalization of marijuana, but I'm even more for not disseminating ignorance. If you disseminate lies, people will not take you seriously. You are a much better advocate for your cause if you give people good information.
off topic
posted by Adam Thomas on 12 Jan 2012 at 7:14 pm@ Matt You are correct, you can overdose on THC and Water. But the amount is ridiculously high for both. Moderation is key for everything.
RE: To Jillian
posted by Moe Monay on 12 Jan 2012 at 8:15 pmJillian - your ignorance is obvious. Why even bother with that post? Are you another pothead pointing out everything bad that isn't marijuana? MATT said it best...
What upset me was JILL post was the first one I viewed scrolling down.
I have an antedote for all: If you are doing something illegally...or even legally but advised against doing some things while "on" such thing............... just hang out at home and save a life. Anyone drunk, high, intoxicated, etc. who thinks life is great as they kill an innocent person will realize the one life that should of been taken was thier own.
Actually, i'm intoxicated now....
AND WHAT'S THE DEAL WITH DRUNK PEOPLE?!?!?!
marijuana IS non-toxic
posted by jeff large on 12 Jan 2012 at 8:20 pmAbove this post is a comment made that marijuana can't be completely safe and if he eats a plate of high-powered thai-stick brownies he could be injured.
I'm sure you would be dizzy and feel pretty weird but it would NOT hurt you. Two boxes of brownies? STILL not enough to physically hurt you but sure, if you eat a gallon of green apples you'll be sick as a dog but afterwards...you'll be OK.
Take a handful of Tylenol, you are dead. So, do YOUR research and you can support your "cause" whatever it is.
A lot of spent time/effort. Wasted?
posted by Aaron S on 12 Jan 2012 at 9:21 pm60000 pages is mighty. So...let's see. Given the time to type, edit, re-edit, research, create original thought, produce charts and diagrams (which must account for some of the pages), I'm going to guess:
Typing: 10 minutes per page
Edit: 15 minutes per page
Re-edit: 5 minutes per page
Research: 5 minutes per page
Other: 5 minutes per page
= 40 minutes per page
40mins/page x 60000 pages = 2.4million minutes
= 4 years, 205 days, 16 hours, 45 minutes
Converted to working time, say 55 hours per week, that is
= 13 years, 342 days, 18 hours, 15 minutes
So, given a 5 person team (baseless assumption, but have to start somewhere), this was a steady, ongoing 2+ year effort!!! Who pays the salaries of these people???
Oh. UCONN. Wait, what's this?
"UConn Health Center said it worked closely with the US Office of Research Integrity (ORI) throughout its internal investigation. ORI have received the report, and they will now conduct an independent investigation."
Hold up. UCONN just spent 3+ freaking years (since 2008) studying this and wrote 60000 PAGES. WHAT MORE DO YOU NEED TO DO, ORI?
Can I have some wine now to go with my whine?
/Please post PDF of report so I can explode my printer.
Troof
posted by The Truth Fairy on 12 Jan 2012 at 10:51 pmIt is pretty much non-toxic to all doses. THC basically can't kill you, you'd die from eating too many brownies, or from lung collapse long before you could consume enough THC to die.
Yaaawwwnnnn - scientist who commits fraud?
posted by Albert E on 13 Jan 2012 at 9:28 amWhat?!? A MEDICAL scientist who commits fraud??? And here I thought that was reserved for GLOBAL WARMING scientists and Al The Poodle.
Sam
posted by Sam on 26 Jan 2012 at 6:54 pmJillian is right. In order to OD on cannabis you would have to smoke your own body weight. Even if you only weighed 50 lbs, you would die from smoke inhalation long before you actually OD on the cannabis itself.
First 10 opinions shown. For all opinions, click through to the full thread.
Add Your Opinion
Please note that we publish your name, but we do not publish your email address. It is only used to let you know when your message is published. We do not use it for any other purpose. Please see our privacy policy for more information.
If you write about specific medications or operations, please do not name health care professionals by name.
All opinions are moderated before being included (to stop spam)
Contact Our News Editors
For any corrections of factual information, or to contact the editors please use our feedback form.
![]()
Please send any medical news or health news press releases to:
Note: Any medical information published on this website is not intended as a substitute for informed medical advice and you should not take any action before consulting with a health care professional. For more information, please read our terms and conditions.



