MRSA, In Pork Products
Editor's ChoiceMain Category: MRSA / Drug Resistance
Article Date: 24 Jan 2012 - 10:00 PST
| Patient / Public: | ![]() |
4.33 (3 votes) |
| Healthcare Prof: | ![]() |
According to a study by the University of Iowa College of Public Health and the Institute for Agriculture and Trade Policy, the prevalence of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus bacteria (MRSA) in retail pork products in the U.S. is higher than researchers originally thought. The study represents the largest sampling of raw meat products for MRSA contamination to date, and is published online in the journal PLoS ONE.
It is estimated that MRSA - which can occur in raw meat products and in the environment - is responsible for approximately 185,000 cases of food poisoning each year. The bacteria does not respond to several antibiotics and can cause severe infections of the bloodstream, heart, lungs, skin and other organs.
After collecting 395 raw pork samples from 36 stores in New Jersey, Iowa and Minnesota, the researchers found that approximately 7% (26 of the 395) carried MRSA.
Tara Smith, Ph.D., lead author of the study, interim director of the UI Center for Emerging and Infectious Diseases and assistant professor of epidemiology, explained:
"This study shows that the meat we buy in our grocery stores has a higher prevalence of staph than we originally thought. With this knowledge, we can start to recommend safer ways to handle raw meat products to make it safer for the consumer."
Furthermore, no considerable difference in MRSA contamination was found between pigs raised without antibiotics or antibiotic growth promotants and conventional pork products.
Smith said:
"We were surprised to see no significant difference in antibiotic-free and conventionally produced pork. Though it's possible that this finding has more to do with the handling of the raw meat at the plant than the way the animals were raised, it's certainly worth exploring further."
Written By Grace Rattue
Copyright: Medical News Today
Not to be reproduced without permission of Medical News Today
O'Brien AM, Hanson BM, Farina SA, Wu JY, Simmering JE, et al.
PLoS ONE 7(1): e30092. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0030092
MLA
23 Feb. 2012. <http://www.medicalnewstoday.com/articles/240707.php>
APA
http://www.medicalnewstoday.com/articles/240707.php.
Please note: If no author information is provided, the source is cited instead.
|
Rate this article: (Hover over the stars then click to rate) |
Patient / Public: |
or |
Health Professional: |
Add Your Opinion
Please note that we publish your name, but we do not publish your email address. It is only used to let you know when your message is published. We do not use it for any other purpose. Please see our privacy policy for more information.
If you write about specific medications or operations, please do not name health care professionals by name.
All opinions are moderated before being included (to stop spam)
Contact Our News Editors
For any corrections of factual information, or to contact the editors please use our feedback form.
![]()
Please send any medical news or health news press releases to:
Note: Any medical information published on this website is not intended as a substitute for informed medical advice and you should not take any action before consulting with a health care professional. For more information, please read our terms and conditions.




