Frying Food in Olive or Sunflower Oil Better For Heart
Editor's ChoiceAcademic Journal
Main Category: Heart Disease
Also Included In: Nutrition / Diet
Article Date: 26 Jan 2012 - 6:00 PST
Frying Food in Olive or Sunflower Oil Better For Heart
| Patient / Public: | ![]() |
|
| Healthcare Prof: | ![]() |
2.33 (3 votes) |
| Article opinions: | 1 posts |
According to a study published on bmj.com, heart disease or premature death is not associated with consuming food fried in sunflower or olive oil.
The study was conducted in Spain, a country in the Mediterranean where sunflower or olive oil is used for frying. The researchers stress that their results would probably not be the same in countries which primarily use solid and re-used oils for frying.
One of the move prevalent cooking methods in the Western Hemisphere is frying. Food absorbs the fat of the oils when fried, increasing the amount of calories in the food.
Although consuming high quantities of fried food can increase some heart disease risk factors, such as obesity, hypertension and high cholesterol, investigators have not fully researched the association between heart disease and fried food.
Therefore the researchers, led by Professor Pilar Guallar-Castillón from Autonomous University of Madrid, surveyed 40,757 adults aged between 26 to 69 years old over an 11-year period about their cooking methods. At the start of the study, none of the participants had heart disease.
The researchers defined fried food as food for which frying was the only cooking method used. Participants were asked questions about their diet and cooking methods, in addition to questions, such as whether food was fried, crumbed, battered or sautéed.
The participants' diet was divided into four ranges of fried food consumption, the first range related to the lowest amount of fried food consumed and the fourth range related to the highest amount.
1,134 deaths were observed during the follow-up period as well as 606 events associated to heart disease.
The researchers conclude:
"In a Mediterranean country where olive and sunflower oils are the most commonly used fats for frying, and where large amounts of fried foods are consumed both at and away from home, no association was observed between fried food consumption and the risk of coronary heart disease or death."
In an associated report, Professor Michael Leitzmann from the University of Regensburg in Germany, explains that the study investigates the myth that "frying food is generally bad for the heart," although he stresses that this "does not mean that frequent meals of fish and chips will have no health consequences." Leitzmann adds that specific aspects of frying food are relevant, such as the type of oil used.
Written by Grace Rattue
Copyright: Medical News Today
Not to be reproduced without permission of Medical News Today
Pilar Guallar-Castillón et al.
BMJ 2012; 344 doi: 10.1136/bmj.e363 (Published 24 January 2012)
Editorial: “Fried foods and the risk of coronary heart disease”
BMJ 2012; 344 doi: 10.1136/bmj.d8274 (Published 24 January 2012)
MLA
20 May. 2013. <http://www.medicalnewstoday.com/articles/240753.php>
APA
http://www.medicalnewstoday.com/articles/240753.php.
Please note: If no author information is provided, the source is cited instead.
Visitor Opinions (latest shown first)
Junk-poor research methodology
posted by jay kaye on 27 Jan 2012 at 4:37 pmAnd the study says nothing......
The researchers model was all self reported from questionnaire and
"At baseline, prevalent coronary heart disease was self reported. During follow-up, we ascertained incident coronary heart disease with a telephone questionnaire (at three years after recruitment)"
So they started the study asking people this question: Do you have heart disease? and at the end of the study they asked: Do you have heart disease NOW? (or had bypass or if no answer found out if cause of death was MI)
Their definition of heart disease:
A definite coronary heart disease event was defined as one meeting all relevant criteria for a fatal or non-fatal acute myocardial infarction, or angina requiring revascularisation (coronary artery bypass graft or percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty). We defined probable and possible acute coronary heart disease events as cases where electrocardiogram findings were non-specific or the biomarkers were equivocal or missing.
This study had NO science behind it, just suppositional statics.
What I don't get is who pays these guys to produce this kind of garbage and to what end is the study other than to keep their government job.
read the whole study for yourself: http://www.bmj.com/content/344/bmj.e363
Add Your Opinion On This Article
'Frying Food in Olive or Sunflower Oil Better For Heart'Please note that we publish your name, but we do not publish your email address. It is only used to let you know when your message is published. We do not use it for any other purpose. Please see our privacy policy for more information.
If you write about specific medications or operations, please do not name health care professionals by name.
All opinions are moderated before being included (to stop spam)
Contact Our News Editors
For any corrections of factual information, or to contact the editors please use our feedback form.
![]()
Please send any medical news or health news press releases to:
Note: Any medical information published on this website is not intended as a substitute for informed medical advice and you should not take any action before consulting with a health care professional. For more information, please read our terms and conditions.




