Childhood Gender Nonconformity Linked To Higher Abuse Risk

Editor's Choice
Academic Journal
Main Category: Pediatrics / Children's Health
Also Included In: Psychology / Psychiatry;  Mental Health
Article Date: 20 Feb 2012 - 10:00 PST

Current ratings for:
'Childhood Gender Nonconformity Linked To Higher Abuse Risk'

Patient / Public:3 and a half stars

3.5 (12 votes)

Healthcare Prof:3 stars

2.71 (7 votes)

Article opinions: 12 posts

Children who do not conform to their gender-expected behaviors and interests are at a higher risk of being abused and facing subsequent traumas, researchers from Harvard School of Public Health and Children's Hospital Boston reported in the journal Pediatrics. Childhood gender nonconformity refers to a phenomenon in which children, before puberty, do not conform to psychological or sociological patterns expected of their gender, or their identification with the opposite gender. Examples include a preference for playmates of the opposite sex, choosing not to take part in activities thought suitable for their gender, and a propensity to cross-dress.

The authors explained that previous studies had shown that childhood gender nonconformity was associated with poorer relationships between the child and parents. However, no studies had looked at whether nonconformity was linked to the risk of abuse or PTSD (posttraumatic stress disorder) during childhood.

Andrea L. Roberts, PhD., and team set out to determine whether there might be a link between gender nonconformity and childhood sexual, psychological and physical abuse before the age of 11 years. They also examined whether this may be associated with a higher lifetime risk of PTSD.

They gathered data from a self-report questionnaire from the Growing Up Today Study, 2007 wave. The study involved 9,864 respondents, whose average age was 22.7 years. They also tried to determine whether higher childhood abuse exposure might result in a higher rate of PTSD among nonconforming children. They also tried to find out whether childhood gender nonconformity's link to PTSD risk existed regardless of sexual orientation.

The authors found that approximately one in every ten children displays gender nonconformity before reaching 11 years of age. By early adulthood, these children are significantly more likely to have experienced sexual, psychological and physical abuse, as well as PTSD by early adulthood.

The most likely abuser was found to be either a parent or some older adult who lived in the household.

Roberts said:

"(before 11 years of age, children frequenly) exhibit a wide variety of behaviors that mean nothing about their future sexual preferences."


Roberts added that even children whose nonconformity was mild, faced harmful discrimination and intolerance, with effects that sometimes persisted for the rest of their lives.

In an Abstract in the journal, the researchers concluded:

"We identify gender nonconformity as an indicator of children at increased risk of abuse and probable PTSD. Pediatricians and school health providers should consider abuse screening for this vulnerable population.

Further research to understand how gender nonconformity might increase risk of abuse and to develop family interventions to reduce abuse risk is needed."


Written by Christian Nordqvist
Copyright: Medical News Today
Not to be reproduced without permission of Medical News Today

Visit our pediatrics / children's health section for the latest news on this subject.
"Childhood Gender Nonconformity: A Risk Indicator for Childhood Abuse and Posttraumatic Stress in Youth"
Andrea L. Roberts, PhD, Margaret Rosario, PhD, Heather L. Corliss, PhD, Karestan C. Koenen, PhD, and S. Bryn Austin, ScD
Pediatrics Feb 20th, 2012. doi: 10.1542/peds.2011-1804.
Please use one of the following formats to cite this article in your essay, paper or report:

MLA
Christian Nordqvist. "Childhood Gender Nonconformity Linked To Higher Abuse Risk." Medical News Today. MediLexicon, Intl., 20 Feb. 2012. Web.
26 May. 2012. <http://www.medicalnewstoday.com/articles/241914.php>

APA
Christian Nordqvist. (2012, February 20). "Childhood Gender Nonconformity Linked To Higher Abuse Risk." Medical News Today. Retrieved from
http://www.medicalnewstoday.com/articles/241914.php.

Please note: If no author information is provided, the source is cited instead.



Visitor Opinions (latest shown first)

more leeway

posted by nanna sally on 27 Feb 2012 at 2:15 pm

I am not surprised to hear this, as abusers like to justify their actions in some way - though they don't really need an excuse.
I agree that children should have more leeway as to how to behave - why should a boy not be caring or like colours? Why should a girl not like climbing trees and tinkering with engines?????

| post followup | alert a moderator |


Ever Been a Kid?

posted by Amazon on 21 Feb 2012 at 9:17 am

I was born female, and would be 6'5" by the time I was 14 years old. My father is a "Good Old Boy" from the old south. I'll admit that maybe he didn't mean any harm. Still, my sister and I were raised to "put our gender aside and get the work done." I must have been about 8 (if not younger) when the realization sank in that if you weren't male, you weren't ****. So I said to myself, "I can do that!" I was slso larger and stronger than any of the boys in my class. Spent my formative years caught between the two! Further, by the Myers-Briggs, I'm a solid INFP. A more perfect magnet for bullying was never born. "Ugly Duckling Syndrome", anyone? So pardon if I don't "shut the hell up" if I've *lived* through this kind of hell, and wouldn't put a child through the same. The "firm hand" only made it worse. Thank the gods ivy-league academis is finally bringing this to public discussion :)

| post followup | alert a moderator |


What does not being gender specific actually have to do with abuse?

posted by Alissa Stensrud on 20 Feb 2012 at 11:04 pm

Robert Woolfolk, I have to agree with you completely! I read this article in hopes of something interesting to read, only to be completely appalled by the end. I have a two and half year old girl who loves monsters, pirates and ninjas, and also her baby dolls and bracelets. I have never stopped her from doing boy things like play in the dirt with her matchbox cars and get messy , and I don't see that as an issue or that I or anyone in my home could be abusing her in any way. To me that's called being open minded to every possibility. Who cares if girls like boy things, and boys like girl things? When I was a kid I loved climbing trees and playing sports, I just figured myself to be more of a tomboy. I guess there has to be something wrong with everything these days. People can't just deal with the fact that not everything has to be close-minded, and sometimes its just called being a kid and happy. If abuse was legitimately involved, then I think more signs than wearing the opposite sex's clothing should be necessary.

| post followup | alert a moderator |


Poolry Qualified Generalization

posted by Robert Woolfolk on 20 Feb 2012 at 12:32 pm

My second daughter, who is seven, displays a great deal of “Gender Nonconformity” and has since she was four or five years old. For some time my wife and I thought it was just so that she could stake out a different space that her older sister who is a “girly” girl. While we still lean that way, we’re now beginning to wonder when we might need to consider if it’s a leading indicator of sexual preference and how we could prepare for providing support if that is the case. But what we do is provide support, a loving home where she feels safe and is free to be whomever she chooses. We understand that she may face some intolerance outside of the home but to state that “these children are significantly more likely to have experienced sexual, psychological and physical abuse, as well as PTSD by early adulthood” and that “The most likely abuser was found to be either a parent or some older adult who lived in the household” really goes a bit far in making a generalization that folks like my wife and I may have to fight. Define what “significantly more” really means, be a little more specific. I found this article looking to educate myself so that I do what’s right by my girl. I can only hope nobody a school finds it, looks at my girl and the way she dresses and then leaps to the conclusion that my wife or I must be abusing her. Your article opens that door and I think if you were going to do that you have something more before you went there.

| post followup | alert a moderator |


A question

posted by AK on 20 Feb 2012 at 12:25 pm

Does this also apply to children who are forced by circumstance into gender role nonconformity by stupid hippie parents who thought it would be a good idea to raise a little girl like a little boy in spite of that little girl's express desire to be presented as a female?

| post followup | alert a moderator |


cart before the horse?

posted by nyc on 20 Feb 2012 at 12:01 pm

The results can easily be read suggest that gender nonconformity before age 11 is a causal factor in later abuse (the article to its credit does not draw that conclusion). But did the study look at whether abuse or related caretaker behaviors predate nonconformity, and thus might themselves be causal factors?

| post followup | alert a moderator |


Self-Evident

posted by Harold A. Maio on 20 Feb 2012 at 11:45 am

Childhood Gender Nonconformity Linked To Higher Abuse Risk

How is that not self-evident?

| post followup | alert a moderator |


really? did anyone involved with this study ever have kids

posted by John Smith on 20 Feb 2012 at 11:37 am

comon, did anyone involved with this study ever have kids? heck, at this point, i am wondering if they have even driven past a school... as a real parent that raised real children, i will stand up and decry this dreck for what it is, absolute garbage. If a child displays an ambiguous gender is subject to a somewhat higher level of scrutiny from their peers, but i will be damned if i can stomach the claim that somehow parents are going to be more likely to abuse a very young child for any preceived sexual misbehavior. again, i say that if you haven't raised a kid, then shut the hell up about them!

| post followup | alert a moderator |


Tighter or looser?

posted by Ruth on 20 Feb 2012 at 11:17 am

So instead of buckling up to gender specific roles we need to work harder on opening up what is "allowed" for each sex i.e. it would do nothing but good for boys to be better caretakers, which playing with dolls may help. Similarly girls may gain a greater sense of confidence by climbing trees.

| post followup | alert a moderator |


Clearly they need Jesus

posted by XP on 20 Feb 2012 at 11:12 am

Call it what you will, but sometimes it takes a firm hand to put children on the right track!

| post followup | alert a moderator |


View from a survivor of child abuse.

posted by Geoffrey Nicastro on 20 Feb 2012 at 11:10 am

I really admire that there is some science being done that will help identify kids who have suffered abuse. My feeling is that far too little is being done for the children who suffer this kind of abuse. The science of healing needs WAY more attention. The media is criminally negligent in only reporting the crimes and punishment a near 0% is spent on where kids can go for help and how to help the kids. This equation has been uneven in favor of hate over help and healing. I would love to see that change. It is a shame that hate sells more air time than the desperate support the children really need.

| post followup | alert a moderator |


Not the child's fault

posted by letstalkaboutit on 20 Feb 2012 at 10:33 am

Sounds like the problem's with the parent, not the child. *Maybe* girls who do "boys things" are more active and therefore fitter and "cuter" which makes them more attractive to a parent struggling with a socially-inappropriate attraction?

| post followup | alert a moderator |


Add Your Opinion On This Article

'Childhood Gender Nonconformity Linked To Higher Abuse Risk'

Please note that we publish your name, but we do not publish your email address. It is only used to let you know when your message is published. We do not use it for any other purpose. Please see our privacy policy for more information.

If you write about specific medications or operations, please do not name health care professionals by name.

All opinions are moderated before being included (to stop spam)

Your Name:*
E-mail Address:*
Your Opinion Title:*
Opinion:*
This is to help prevent SPAM submissions. Please enter the words exactly as they appear, including capital letters and punctuation.*

* Fields marked with a * need to be filled in before you hit the submit button.

Contact Our News Editors

For any corrections of factual information, or to contact the editors please use our feedback form.

Please send any medical news or health news press releases to:

Note: Any medical information published on this website is not intended as a substitute for informed medical advice and you should not take any action before consulting with a health care professional. For more information, please read our terms and conditions.


Pediatrics / Children's Health

What is Pneumococcal Disease?

Pneumococcal disease is an infection caused by the Streptococcus pneumoniae (S. pneumoniae) bacterium, also known as pneumococcus. Infection can result in pneumonia, infection of the blood (bacteremia/sepsis), middle-ear infection (otitis media)... Read more...

Most Popular Articles



Follow Our Pediatrics News On Twitter

Follow Us On Twitter
Get the latest news for this category delivered straight to your Twitter account. Simply visit our Pediatrics / Children's Health Twitter account and select the 'follow' option.



View list of all 'What Is...' articles »