Assisted Dying - Doctors Should Remain Neutral
Editor's ChoiceMain Category: Primary Care / General Practice
Also Included In: Cancer / Oncology; Public Health
Article Date: 19 Jun 2012 - 14:00 PST
Ad For Health Professionals
Assisted Dying - Doctors Should Remain Neutral
| Patient / Public: | ![]() |
3 (1 votes) |
| Healthcare Prof: | ![]() |
5 (1 votes) |
| Article opinions: | 3 posts |
A resent study has shown that 62 percent of 1004 GPs believe that medical bodies, such as the BMA (British Medical Association) should adopt a position of "studied neutrality", with regard to the question whether assisted dying for terminally ill adults who are mentally competent should be legalized.
The online survey, commissioned by Healthcare Professionals for Assisted Dying (HPAD) and Dignity in Dying also revealed that only 33% of GPs believed that medical organizations should not take a position of neutrality, because they believe that medical organizations should only play a supporting role, or because those who believe it should vote against it.
Delegates will debate whether or not the BMA should change its current position of opposition to assisted dying to adopting a neutral position at the BMA Annual Representatives' Meeting (ARM) on 27th June.
Prof Raymond Tallis, Chair of Healthcare Professionals for Assisted Dying, declared:
"This poll shows decisively that the BMA is failing to represent its members by taking a position of opposition to the legalization of assisted dying. We know that opinion amongst doctors on assisted dying is mixed - for example, as demonstrated in an earlier poll, only one in three doctors would not want the choice of an assisted death for themselves. And research has shown that 30%-40% of doctors actively support assisted dying. The present poll demonstrates that the majority of doctors do not support the BMA taking a position either for or against on this issue. The BMA needs to stop pandering to a vocal minority and start representing the majority of its members."
Tallis continues:
"What is more, the BMA should respect the views of society at large. Survey after survey has found support for assisted dying at greater than 80% in the general population. Medical paternalism should be a thing of the past. The BMA's current opposition is unrepresentative and untenable. I trust that this year's ARM will do the right thing and change the BMA's position to one of studied neutrality."
Written By Petra Rattue
Copyright: Medical News Today
Not to be reproduced without permission of Medical News Today
MLA
20 Jun. 2013. <http://www.medicalnewstoday.com/articles/246782.php>
APA
http://www.medicalnewstoday.com/articles/246782.php.
Please note: If no author information is provided, the source is cited instead.
Visitor Opinions (latest shown first)
Euthanasia and assisted suicide--neutral?
posted by Adrian Houghton on 22 Jun 2012 at 1:49 amThe BMA has always been opposed to any change of the law to allow euthanasia or assisted suicide apart from one year of its history (2005-2006) when it was briefly neutral.
My GP education group and I showed no wish to change the status quo in discusion this week.
The German medical association is not neutral. They are the largest medical union in Europe and voted this year that doctors should have nothing to do with euthanasia or assisted suicide. Living memory of 20th century abuses there lives on.
It's not what you ask but the way that you ask it.....
posted by Trevor Stammers on 20 Jun 2012 at 9:44 amThe term assisted dying is guaranteed to cause confusion when it occurs in any question in a poll about whether patients want their doctors to be allowed in law either to kill them or provide for them the means to kill themselves. This is what those campaigning for BMA neutrality clearly want. Neutrality is just the first step to this end.
As a doctor completely opposed to relaxing the law and thus permitting doctors to kill their patients or help them to kill themselves, even I support assisted dying in the sense that, if my death should be prolonged and painful I would want assistance in coping with the dying process. When I and many others regard good palliative care as assisted dying, no wonder there is confusion in polls using the term "assisted dying". It's use should be avoided in the current debate.
This poll is part of a campaign
posted by Dr Peter S on 20 Jun 2012 at 4:22 amThis poll was part of a carefully orchestrated campaign by two pressure groups, Dignity in Dying and Healthcare Professionals for Assisted Dying, ahead of a move to shift the BMA to a neutral position.
The question itself was framed in an unbalanced way and did not define its key terms (eg. assisted dying and terminally ill).
It has understandably come under significant criticism in the BMJ correspondence columns.
Add Your Opinion On This Article
'Assisted Dying - Doctors Should Remain Neutral'Please note that we publish your name, but we do not publish your email address. It is only used to let you know when your message is published. We do not use it for any other purpose. Please see our privacy policy for more information.
If you write about specific medications or operations, please do not name health care professionals by name.
All opinions are moderated before being included (to stop spam)
Contact Our News Editors
For any corrections of factual information, or to contact the editors please use our feedback form.
![]()
Please send any medical news or health news press releases to:
Note: Any medical information published on this website is not intended as a substitute for informed medical advice and you should not take any action before consulting with a health care professional. For more information, please read our terms and conditions.




