Folic Acid Supplements Not Linked To Increased Cancer Risk

Editor's Choice
Academic Journal
Main Category: Nutrition / Diet
Also Included In: Cancer / Oncology
Article Date: 25 Jan 2013 - 11:00 PST

Current ratings for:
Folic Acid Supplements Not Linked To Increased Cancer Risk

Patient / Public:4 and a half stars

4.5 (2 votes)

Healthcare Prof:5 stars

5 (2 votes)


Folic acid supplements are not linked to an increased cancer risk when taken for up to 5 years.

The finding came from new research which looked at data on nearly 50,000 people and was published in The Lancet.

Short-term use of folic acid supplements is unlikely to considerably increase or decrease overall cancer risk and has little impact on the risk of developing any specific cancers, such as prostate, colon, lung, and breast.

According to the researchers, this report should reassure people that short-term folic acid intake, either through fortification or from supplements, is actually safe. A prior study in the journal CANCER indicated that folic acid supplements may stop cancer from progressing and promote regression of disease.

Robert Clarke, one of the lead authors and from the University of Of Oxford, UK, said:

"The nationwide fortification of foods involves much lower doses of folic acid than studied in these trials, which is reassuring not only for the USA who have been enriching flour with folic acid to prevent neural tube birth defects (such as spina bifida) since 1998, but also for over 50 other countries where fortification is mandatory (eg, Australia, South Africa, Chile, Argentina, and Brazil)."


Clarke and a team of experts from the B-Vitamin Treatment Trialists' Collaboration analyzed all large randomized trials of folic acid supplementation (with or without B vitamins) up to the end of 2010.

Results from the meta-analysis showed that the subjects who took folic acid every day for at least 5 years did not have a considerably higher chance of developing cancer compared to those who took placebo.

The folic acid groups had 7.7% (1904) new cases of cancer while the placebo groups had 7.3% (1809) new cases.

No notable increase in overall cancer incidence was seen even in the subjects with the highest average intake of folic acid (40 mg per day), the experts explained.

The folic acid and placebo groups showed no considerable difference in the number of subjects who developed lung, breast, colorectal, prostate, or any other type of cancer.

The scientists also found no evidence that taking folic acid for longer periods of time elevated a person's chance of developing cancer.

Clarke concluded:

"Both the hopes for rapid cancer prevention and the fears about rapidly increased cancer risk from folic acid supplementation were not confirmed by this meta-analysis.   It remains to be seen whether any beneficial or harmful effects on cancer incidence will eventually emerge with even longer treatment or follow up."


In a linked statement, Cornelia M Ulrich, Director of the National Center for Tumor Diseases and German Cancer Research Center, and Joshua W Miller, from Rutgers University in the USA, noted that it is important to remember the dual relationship of folate and cancer. Although it may protect against cancer development, it can also result in the growth of existing cancer cells.

This is especially significant, they said, for "those who consume excess folic acid from fortification and supplements combined. Notably, 1-4% of the US population, depending on age, sex, and ethnic origin, exceed the tolerable upper limit (1 mg/day) for total consumption of folic acid."

Written by Sarah Glynn
Copyright: Medical News Today
Not to be reproduced without permission of Medical News Today

Visit our nutrition / diet section for the latest news on this subject.
Effects of folic acid supplementation on overall and site-specific cancer incidence during the randomised trials: meta-analyses of data on 50 000 individuals
Stein Emil Vollset, Robert Clarke, Sarah Lewington, Marta Ebbing, Jim Halsey, Eva Lonn, Jane Armitage, JoAnn E Manson, Graeme J Hankey, J David Spence, Pilar Galan, Kaare H Bønaa, Rex Jamison, J Michael Gaziano, Peter Guarino, John A Baron, Richard FA Logan, Edward L Giovannucci, Martin den Heijer, Per M Ueland, Derrick Bennett, Rory Collins, Richard Peto
The Lancet 25 January 2013; doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(12)62001-7
Please use one of the following formats to cite this article in your essay, paper or report:

MLA
Glynn, Sarah. "Folic Acid Supplements Not Linked To Increased Cancer Risk." Medical News Today. MediLexicon, Intl., 25 Jan. 2013. Web.
20 May. 2013. <http://www.medicalnewstoday.com/articles/255453.php>

APA
Glynn, S. (2013, January 25). "Folic Acid Supplements Not Linked To Increased Cancer Risk." Medical News Today. Retrieved from
http://www.medicalnewstoday.com/articles/255453.php.

Please note: If no author information is provided, the source is cited instead.



Add Your Opinion On This Article

'Folic Acid Supplements Not Linked To Increased Cancer Risk'

Please note that we publish your name, but we do not publish your email address. It is only used to let you know when your message is published. We do not use it for any other purpose. Please see our privacy policy for more information.

If you write about specific medications or operations, please do not name health care professionals by name.

All opinions are moderated before being included (to stop spam)

Your Name:*
E-mail Address:*
Your Opinion Title:*
Opinion:*
This is to help prevent SPAM submissions. Please enter the words exactly as they appear, including capital letters and punctuation.*

* Fields marked with a * need to be filled in before you hit the submit button.

Contact Our News Editors

For any corrections of factual information, or to contact the editors please use our feedback form.

Please send any medical news or health news press releases to:

Note: Any medical information published on this website is not intended as a substitute for informed medical advice and you should not take any action before consulting with a health care professional. For more information, please read our terms and conditions.


Nutrition / Diet

What Is Vitamin D?

Vitamin D is a steroid vitamin, a group of fat-soluble prohormones, which encourages the absorption and metabolism of calcium and phosphorous. Read more...

The Eight Most Popular Diets

From Atkins to Vegan, South Beach to Mediterranean, we have selected the most popular diets available today. Read more...

What Are The Top 10 Healthy Foods?

Imagine a selection of foods that were delicious, nutritious and good for you - i.e. they reduced your risk of developing diseases. Read more...

How Many Calories Should I Eat?

The number of calories people should eat each day depends on several factors, including their age, size, height, sex, lifestyle, and overall general health. Read more...

Most Popular Articles



Follow Our Nutrition News On Twitter

Follow Us On Twitter
Get the latest news for this category delivered straight to your Twitter account. Simply visit our Nutrition / Diet Twitter account and select the 'follow' option.



View list of all 'What Is...' articles »