Tanning Salons Allowing Children To Use Facilities
Editor's ChoiceAcademic Journal
Main Category: Melanoma / Skin Cancer
Also Included In: Dermatology; Pediatrics / Children's Health
Article Date: 26 Feb 2013 - 0:00 PST
Tanning Salons Allowing Children To Use Facilities
| Patient / Public: | ![]() |
|
| Healthcare Prof: | ![]() |
4.67 (3 votes) |
| Article opinions: | 2 posts |
Despite the ever-increasing evidence of the health risks associated with using indoor tanning beds, a recent survey conducted on tanning salon operators in the state of Missouri revealed that 65 percent continue to allow kids as young as 10 to use their facilities. The finding was published in the journal Pediatrics.
The use of tanning beds has been shown to increase one's risk of developing all forms of skin cancer - even melanoma, which is the deadliest. A report in the BMJ revealed that indoor tanning is estimated to be the cause of over 170,000 cases of non-melanoma skin cancer in the United States every year.
The World Health Organization even issued a statement saying that people under the age of 18 should not be allowed to use tanning bed facilities, given the evidence of its severe health effects from numerous scientific studies and their increased risk.
Over the past few years, many other states have already started introducing new laws to protect children's skin and health from these effects.
On July 16th, 2012, Andrew Cuomo, the Governor of New York, signed a bill that banned people under the age of 16 from using tanning beds.
In California, a similar bill was passed that raised the minimum age for using tanning beds from 14, to 18 years, becoming the first state to prohibit the use of indoor tanning beds to minors.
However, Missouri continues to be one of the 17 states that have yet to implement any form of age restriction on tanning bed use.
According to the co-author of the study and chief of the Division of Dermatology, Lynn Cornelius, MD:
"With the absence of logical age restrictions, we are failing to protect our children, who are at an increased risk of developing skin cancer when exposed to the high-intensity levels of ultraviolet light that can be received in a tanning bed."
Ultraviolet radiation from tanning beds cause cancer
Exposure to the ultraviolet radiation from tanning beds can provide short-term cosmetic tanning, yet at the same it carries the long-term price of severely increasing one's risk of developing cancer.The radiation that tanning beds emit can be detrimental to people's health. Is it worth the risk?
Cornelius points out that there is research indicating it can increase the risk of melanoma by up to 3 times, as well as doubling the risk of non-melanoma cancers.
The authors said they consistently see melanoma patients who frequently went to tanning salons.
Of the 831 tanning facilities in the state of Missouri, the researchers randomly selected 375 to interview. They called them up as prospective clients and asked them a series of questions. In order for the results to be as accurate and consistent as possible they tried to survey each salon twice.
A total of 243 salons fully answered both telephone interviews.
The majority of the salons (65 percent) admitted that they would allow children aged of 10 or 12 to use their facilities. In addition, 43 percent gave false information about the safety of indoor-tanning-devices, stating that there were no health risks associated with their use.
The authors wrote:
"Minimizing exposure to ultraviolet rays, no matter the source, lowers one's risk of skin cancer. The problem with indoor tanning is that users start very young and, unlike the sun, tanning beds are a completely avoidable cancer risk."
Everyone should limit exposure to ultraviolet rays as much as they can to reduce their of risk of developing skin cancer. Colditz recommends avoiding the use of indoor tanning salons and suggests using sunless tanning lotions instead, which have no identifiable health risks.
Written by Joseph Nordqvist
Copyright: Medical News Today
Not to be reproduced without permission of Medical News Today
Balaraman B, Biesbroeck LK, Lickerman SH, Cornelius LA, Jeffe DB.
Pediatrics
MLA
21 May. 2013. <http://www.medicalnewstoday.com/articles/256859.php>
APA
http://www.medicalnewstoday.com/articles/256859.php.
Please note: If no author information is provided, the source is cited instead.
Visitor Opinions (latest shown first)
Pitiful research
posted by Dereck on 26 Feb 2013 at 5:42 amThere are a number of reasons why this is a ridiculous piece of research and in no way relates to today's professional tanning salons in the United States. This "research" is nothing but a phone survey. It is disingenuous to make the jump from what is said on the phone to saying that salons would let a 10-year-old tan. This research is also out of date, from 2007, and most notably the study includes a large percentage of non-tanning salon locations that have tanning beds (gyms, etc.) Operators of these places are not properly trained like the operators at professional tanning salons, thus it would make sense that they would provide the wrong information, skewing the data.....Given that the authors are lobbying for tanning legislation, it's not surprising that they would do their best to make their research sound as bad as possible. The fact that they make the absurd comparison between tanning and tobacco just shows that they have no intention of being reasonable. Hundreds of thousands of people die directly from tobacco use every year while around 10,000 die of skin cancer per year (primarily older men who have never stepped foot in a tanning salon).
This comparison also ignores the fact that there are undeniable benefits of UV exposure, whereas there are none with tobacco. UV light from tanning beds is only listed as a class 1 carcinogen because UV light from the sun is classified as the same. Also included in this category are birth control, salted fish and wine. It's amazing to me that any scientist would make such a comparison. It's also important to note that the tanning industry is in favor of implementation of parental consent laws.
Baseless nonsense on tanning salons
posted by Robert Harris on 26 Feb 2013 at 3:35 amThe use of artificial UV light sources can be beneficial to individuals of all ages, particularly in mid-winter at polar latitudes. The spread of viral illnesses can be checked when immune systems are boosted by natural vitamin D production in the skin, which is triggered by UV exposure. Vitamin D is necessary for calcium absorption in bones, without which osteoporosis occurs. In young children, having adequate vitamin D prevents rickets. Dosages should be worked out based on the type of light source, its intensity, and the individual's skin pigmentation.
This is hardly new science. UV phototherapy has been safely used since Heraeus and AEG created Quarzlampengesellschaft mbH in 1906 in Germany. Artificial sunray lamps were initially made available for use in doctors' offices, and in the 1920s for home use. Heraeus is still a significant player in lamp manufacturing for the tanning salon market.
Add Your Opinion On This Article
'Tanning Salons Allowing Children To Use Facilities'Please note that we publish your name, but we do not publish your email address. It is only used to let you know when your message is published. We do not use it for any other purpose. Please see our privacy policy for more information.
If you write about specific medications or operations, please do not name health care professionals by name.
All opinions are moderated before being included (to stop spam)
Contact Our News Editors
For any corrections of factual information, or to contact the editors please use our feedback form.
![]()
Please send any medical news or health news press releases to:
Note: Any medical information published on this website is not intended as a substitute for informed medical advice and you should not take any action before consulting with a health care professional. For more information, please read our terms and conditions.



