Creating a free account will enable you to subscribe to our daily and weekly email newsletters, as well as customize your reading experience to show only the categories most relevant to you.
Signing up only take a few minutes, so why not give it a try and see what you've been missing out on.
In a large UK study of teenage twins, researchers found that differences in exam grades owed more to genes than family environment, schools and teachers. In math, English and science, genes accounted for nearly 60% of the differences, they found.
The team from King's College London reported the results of their study, which involved over 11,000 identical and non-identical 16-year-old twins online in a recent edition of PLOS ONE.
First author Nicholas Shakeshaft, who is working toward a PhD at King's Institute of Psychiatry, says:
"Children differ in how easily they learn at school. Our research shows that differences in students' educational achievement owe more to nature than nurture."
However, he and his colleagues are keen to point out that their findings do not suggest educational achievement is genetically predetermined, nor that family, teachers and schools are unimportant.
Rather, the study highlights the need to recognize the importance of children's natural predispositions in ability to learn.
The team sourced their data from the Twins Early Development Study (TEDS), which is funded by the Medical Research Council (MRC) and based at King's College London. TEDS aims to increase understanding of how nature and nurture - our genes and our environment - influence learning, thinking and behavior.
In their analysis, the team examined results of the twins' GCSE (General Certificate of Secondary Education) exams. GCSEs are national exams that UK students take in the final year of their compulsory education at age 16.
Identical twins share 100% of their genes, while non-identical, or fraternal twins, share on average around 50% of the genes that vary between people.
The analysis showed that the exam scores of identical twins were more similar than the exam scores of non-identical twins, suggesting that the differences in educational achievement was more due to genetics than environment.
The researchers also found the results varied, according to types of subjects:
Mr. Shakeshaft says it is important to note that these results do not imply that in each person the influence of their genes is nearly 60% and cannot be changed. This was a population study, as he explains:
"Since we are studying whole populations, this does not mean that genetics explains 60% of an individual's performance, but rather that genetics explains 60% of the differences between individuals, in the population as it exists at the moment."
"This means that heritability is not fixed," he adds, "if environmental influences change, then the influence of genetics on educational achievement may change too."
Prof. Robert Plomin, senior study author who is also director of TEDS, says:
"Whilst these findings have no necessary or specific implications for educational policies, it's important to recognize the major role that genetics plays in children's educational achievement."
He says the findings imply education systems that are sensitive to individual children's needs may help them perform better at school.
Professor Michael O'Donovan, from the MRC's Neurosciences and Mental Health board at the Medical Research Council, says the study adds to a "convincing body of evidence" that shows genes influence factors that make a difference to educational performance, and he notes:
"But it is equally important to stress that the researchers found that environments for students are also important and that the study does not imply that improvements in education will not have important benefits. For individuals living in the best and worst environments, this exposure is likely to make more of a difference to their educational prospects than their genes."
Like the authors, he says further research is needed to find out what these results mean for educational policies.
In August 2012, researchers from the University of North Texas presented the American Psychological Association's 120th Annual Convention, with the result of a study where they had found physically fit school kids scored higher on reading and math.
They suggested that having a healthy heart and lungs may be one of the most important factors for middle school students to achieve good grades in those subjects.
Written by Catharine Paddock PhD
Copyright: Medical News Today
Not to be reproduced without the permission of Medical News Today.
Strong Genetic Influence on a UK Nationwide Test of Educational Achievement at the End of Compulsory Education at Age 16; Shakeshaft NG, Trzaskowski M, McMillan A, Rimfeld K, Krapohl E, and others; PLoS ONE 8(12): e80341, published online 11 December 2013; DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0080341.
Additional source: King's College London press release via EurekAlert, 11 December 2013.
Visit our Genetics category page for the latest news on this subject.
Please use one of the following formats to cite this article in your essay, paper or report:
Paddock, Catharine. "Nature beats nurture in exam grade differences." Medical News Today. MediLexicon, Intl., 12 Dec. 2013. Web.
8 Mar. 2014. <http://www.medicalnewstoday.com/articles/270042>
Paddock, C. (2013, December 12). "Nature beats nurture in exam grade differences." Medical News Today. Retrieved from
Please note: If no author information is provided, the source is cited instead.
If you write about specific medications, operations, or procedures please do not name healthcare professionals by name.
For any corrections of factual information, or to contact our editorial team, please use our feedback form. Please send any medical news or health news press releases to:
Note: Any medical information published on this website is not intended as a substitute for informed medical advice and you should not take any action before consulting with a health care professional. For more information, please read our terms and conditions.
This page was printed from: http://www.medicalnewstoday.com/articles/270042.php
Visit www.medicalnewstoday.com for medical news and health news headlines posted throughout the day, every day.
© 2004-2014 All rights reserved. MNT (logo) is the registered trade mark of MediLexicon International Limited.