Will Current Flu Pandemic Measures Be Effective Enough?
Featured ArticleMain Category: Bird Flu / Avian Flu
Also Included In: Public Health; Aid / Disasters
Article Date: 27 Apr 2006 - 10:00 PDT
| Patient / Public: | ![]() |
3.78 (9 votes) |
| Healthcare Prof: | ![]() |
3.6 (5 votes) |
Researchers from Imperial College London, John Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health and RTI International have predicted how a variety of interventions may affect the spread of a flu pandemic. The researchers used computer modelling to calculate the effectiveness of such measures as travel restrictions, closing schools and antiviral treatment.
You can read about this study in the journal Nature.
Professor Neil Ferguson, Imperial College London, UK, who led the study, said "The modelling shows there is no single magic bullet which can control a flu pandemic, but that a combination of interventions could be highly effective at reducing transmission, potentially saving many lives."
The researchers concluded that border restrictions may, at best, delay the spread by a few weeks. Only border restrictions that are over 99% effective may offer anything better. They also concluded that restricting domestic travel would have very limited impact.
According to the computer modelling, if a pandemic were to hit the UK, it would peak at about two or three months and be over at four months. Professor Ferguson said response speed is paramount.
The modelling also made these predictions:
-- Closing schools combined with antiviral treatment for sick people and those in the same household would halve the number of people getting ill.
Current plans are just to treat sick people with antivirals - not other household members
-- If people living in the same household as the sick person stayed at home, the impact would be even greater.
-- School closures would not reduce total number of people eventually getting sick by much. But it would slow the spread enough to give health care resources a better chance to cope. School closures could slow down the speed of the spread by as much as 40%.
-- Vaccines would need to be available within two months of the start of a pandemic. With current methods of manufacturing, the country needs to have a good stockpile.
-- Even if the vaccine were not a perfect match to the pandemic virus, having a good stockpile would significantly reduce the numbers of people getting sick.
-- A good stockpile means enough for 20% of the population
-- Children would need to be vaccinated within weeks of the start of a pandemic.
Source: www.imperial.ac.uk/P7726.htmbr>
Written by: Christian Nordqvist
Editor: Medical News Today
Copyright: Medical News Today
Not to be reproduced without permission of Medical News Today
MLA
15 Feb. 2012. <http://www.medicalnewstoday.com/articles/42361.php>
APA
http://www.medicalnewstoday.com/articles/42361.php.
Please note: If no author information is provided, the source is cited instead.
|
Rate this article: (Hover over the stars then click to rate) |
Patient / Public: |
or |
Health Professional: |
Add Your Opinion
Please note that we publish your name, but we do not publish your email address. It is only used to let you know when your message is published. We do not use it for any other purpose. Please see our privacy policy for more information.
If you write about specific medications or operations, please do not name health care professionals by name.
All opinions are moderated before being included (to stop spam)
Contact Our News Editors
For any corrections of factual information, or to contact the editors please use our feedback form.
![]()
Please send any medical news or health news press releases to:
Note: Any medical information published on this website is not intended as a substitute for informed medical advice and you should not take any action before consulting with a health care professional. For more information, please read our terms and conditions.



