Merck Loses Another Vioxx Case, Must Pay $51 Million

Featured Article
Main Category: Litigation / Medical Malpractice
Also Included In: Arthritis / Rheumatology;  Pain / Anesthetics
Article Date: 17 Aug 2006 - 12:00 PST

email icon email to a friend   printer icon printer friendly   write icon opinions  

Current Article Ratings:

Patient / Public:4 stars

3.71 (7 votes)

Healthcare Prof:4 and a half stars

4.33 (3 votes)


Gerald Barnett, 62, a former FBI agent, sued Merck because he claimed its Vioxx painkiller caused him to have a heart attack in 2002. Even though Merck lawyers said Barnett had a history of heart disease and this was why he had a heart attack, a jury has ordered the company to pay Barnett $51 million.

There have been 9 Vioxx trials so far, this is Merck's fourth loss. The company has lost 44% of the trials so far. If it loses 44% of the 16,000 there are still to go, and if juries order multi-million dollar payments for each one, as they have done so far - Merck could be facing an astronomical bill. The company has set aside $1 billion for legal costs and nothing for liabilities.

Merck pulled Vioxx from the market in 2004 after it was shown to raise some patients' risk of strokes and heart attacks.

In this latest case, the Jury calculated Barnett's damages at $50 million. It slapped on $1 million punitive damages. The jury made two decisions: 1. They decided that the drug did cause Barnett's heart attack. 2. They decided that Merck knowingly misrepresented or failed to disclose a material fact about Vioxx to doctors.

Merck's lawyers say they will appeal.

Last November, Frederick Humeston, 60, of New Jersey, took Merck to court, saying Vioxx caused his heart attack. He lost the case. However, a new trial will take place as a result of 'new evidence'.

Merck decision to take this strategy - trying every case separately - may have been a devastating mistake. We will have to wait and see.

What is Vioxx?

Vioxx is a COX-2 selective nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug (NSAID). Vioxx is also related to the nonselective NSAIDs , such as ibuprofen and naproxen. Vioxx was a prescription medicine used to relieve signs and symptoms of arthritis, acute pain in adults, and painful menstrual cycles.

Written by: Christian Nordqvist
Editor: Medical News Today

View drug information on Vioxx.

Copyright: Medical News Today
Not to be reproduced without permission of Medical News Today

Visit our litigation / medical malpractice section for the latest news on this subject.
There are no references listed for this article.
Please use one of the following formats to cite this article in your essay, paper or report:

MLA
Christian Nordqvist. "Merck Loses Another Vioxx Case, Must Pay $51 Million." Medical News Today. MediLexicon, Intl., 17 Aug. 2006. Web.
13 Feb. 2012. <http://www.medicalnewstoday.com/articles/49897.php>

APA
Christian Nordqvist. (2006, August 17). "Merck Loses Another Vioxx Case, Must Pay $51 Million." Medical News Today. Retrieved from
http://www.medicalnewstoday.com/articles/49897.php.

Please note: If no author information is provided, the source is cited instead.


Litigation / Medical Malpractice

Most Popular Articles



Follow Our Litigation News On Twitter

Follow Us On Twitter
Get the latest news for this category delivered straight to your Twitter account. Simply visit our Litigation / Medical Malpractice Twitter account and select the 'follow' option.



View list of all 'What Is...' articles »