Florida Medical Students May Be Deterred From Entering Obstetrics And Gynecology Due To Malpractice Concerns
Main Category: Litigation / Medical MalpracticeAlso Included In: Medical Students / Training
Article Date: 31 Aug 2006 - 3:00 PDT
| Patient / Public: | ![]() |
5 (2 votes) |
| Health Professional: | ![]() |
4 (1 votes) |
| Article Opinions: | 3 posts |
The medical malpractice climate in Florida is discouraging medical students from pursuing careers in obstetrics and gynecology - a trend that could further reduce patients' access to obstetric care, a survey by the University of South Florida College of Medicine found.
The survey results were announced earlier this month at the Florida Obstetric and Gynecological Society (FOGS) annual meeting in West Palm Beach. Aaron Deutsch, MD, lead author of the study and chief resident in the USF Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, presented the findings. The paper received the 2006 first-place resident research award from FOGS.
"Florida is already a state without enough obstetrician/gynecologists to meet the needs of patients. In some parts of the state, women must wait several months to see an obstetrician, and there are no perinatologists or maternal-fetal medicine specialists to take care of high-risk pregnancies," Dr. Deutsch said. "Our findings suggest this shortage may get even worse."
The USF researchers sent surveys to all fourth-year medical students in Florida in fall 2005. The senior year is when medical students find out where they will conduct their residencies - the period of specialized training for licensed medical graduates in their chosen medical field.
Florida mirrors a national trend of fewer medical students applying for ob/gyn residencies. The USF researchers hypothesized that student concerns about the rising cost of malpractice premiums and medical liability in Florida may contribute to the marked decline of students specializing in ob/gyn.
Half of the Florida students surveyed - 42 percent men and 58 percent women - responded. The respondents were divided into three groups - students who selected ob/gyn as a career (had applied to ob/gyn residencies); those who considered ob/gyn as a career but ultimately decided against it; and those who never considered ob/gyn. Of the students selecting a career in ob/gyn, 86 percent reported they are considering leaving Florida to practice because of the medical liability concerns.
Overall, interest in another specialty and lifestyle concerns - work hours and unpredictable schedule - were major reasons students cited for not choosing ob/gyn careers, whether they initially considered the specialty or not. However, the survey demonstrated a significant split in concerns about Florida's medical-legal climate between these two groups.
Of the students who considered ob/gyn but decided against it, 32 percent ranked "fear of malpractice" as the first or second deterrent to entering the field, compared to 21 percent who never considered ob/gyn. Nearly 27 percent of students who considered ob/gyn ranked "fear of being sued" as a first or second deterrent compared to 7 percent who never considered the specialty.
"It appears that some students may have chosen ob/gyn except for the fear of high malpractice insurance costs and lawsuits are associated with our field of medicine," Dr. Deutsch said.
In 2005, Florida ranked first in the top10 states with the most expensive average base rate medical malpractice premiums for obstetrician-gynecologists, according to the Medical Liability Monitor.
The USF authors acknowledge that students who felt strongly about Florida's malpractice climate may have been more inclined to respond to the survey, and cite the need for more national research to clarify future practitioners' concerns.
----------------------------
Article adapted by Medical News Today from original press release.
----------------------------
Joan McCarthy, MD, USF assistant residency director of ob/gyn, and Kelly Murray, MD, were co-authors of the research paper titled "Why are Fewer Medical Students in Florida Choosing Obstetrics and Gynecology?"
Contact: Anne DeLotto Baier
University of South Florida Health
|
Please rate this article: (Hover over the stars then click to rate) |
Patient / Public: |
or |
Health Professional: |
Note: Any medical information published on this website is not intended as a substitute for informed medical advice and you should not take any action before consulting with a health care professional. For more information, please read our terms and conditions.
Visitor Opinions In Chronological Order (3)
Florida's cap on medical malpractice awards doesn't seem to be effective
posted by Jane Marshall on 7 Sep 2006 at 10:53 amAccording to a recent article posted on your web site, the medical malpractice climate in Florida is discouraging medical students from pursuing careers in obstetrics and gynecology. Perhaps this is puzzling to doctors. After all, when tort reformers called for a cap on non-economic damages on awards given to victims of medical malpractice, their strongest selling point was that a cap would reduce doctors' medical malpractice insurance premiums.
The cap became a reality, which was supposed to benefit doctors even though it definitely does not benefit victims of medical malpractice. My sympathy for doctors is limited. They should have researched the subject before jumping on the tort reform bandwagon. If they had done so, they would have discovered that in virtually every state where a cap was placed on non-economic damages, there was no decrease in medical malpractice insurance premiums. In fact, states without a cap often have lower premiums than states with a cap.
Since some medical students find the medical malpractice climate in Florida discouraging and victims, especially the elderly, children, and stay-at-home parents, find the path to justice virtually nonexistent, the law that placed a cap should be repealed and legislators should turn their attention to the real problem: insurance companies.
If that should happen, doctors' concerns about the high cost of medical malpractice insurance premiums would be addressed and victims' constitutional right to have a jury determine the amount of compensation that is appropriate when a medical malpractice lawsuit goes to court would be restored.
Jane Marshall
United States
Jane Is Wrong
posted by Anon on 9 Oct 2007 at 3:13 pmLet me guess, Jane, you are either a law student or a personal injury attorney.
The truth is, in Louisiana, our malpractice premiums are a fraction of what they are in the rest of the country BECAUSE of malpractice caps. Also, because of malpractice caps, Louisiana is only one of about 6 states that are considered "stable" in terms of malpractice issues.
Your mention of insurance companies is irrelevant.
Medical Malpractice Alternative
posted by Bricolage Health on 16 Nov 2007 at 1:51 pmThere is a sane and sound alternative to traditional medical malpractice insurance. A unique solution exists that fulfills a Physician's obligations under Florida law and satisfies the "financially responsible" requirements of every hospital in the state. Qualifying practices will enjoy unparalleled asset protection, top-notch legal defense and greater financial stability while money that would have gone to malpractice premiums works hard building wealth.
Add Your Opinion
All opinions are moderated before being added.
Please note that we publish your name, but we do not publish your email address. It is only used to let you know when your message is published. We do not use it for any other purpose. Please see our privacy policy for more information.
If you write about specific medications or operations, please do not name health care professionals by name.
Contact Our News Editors
For any corrections of factual information, or to contact the editors please use our feedback form.
![]()
Please send any medical news or health news press releases to:
| Back to top | Back to front page | List of All Medical Articles |
| Privacy Policy | Terms and Conditions | © 2010 MediLexicon International Ltd |




