Studies Confirm Long-term Protection Against Precancerous Cervical Lesions With Vaccines Against Human Papilloma Viruses (HPV)
Featured ArticleMain Category: Cervical Cancer / HPV Vaccine
Also Included In: Immune System / Vaccines; Women's Health / Gynecology
Article Date: 18 Apr 2007 - 9:00 PDT
Follow-up studies of two vaccines against HPV causing cervical cancer have shown long-term protection against precancerous lesions, according to results reported at the 2007 Annual Meeting of the American Association for Cancer Research (14-18 April, 2007; Los Angeles, USA).
Results from long-term follow-up of women vaccinated with a candidate vaccine against HPV types 16 and 18 (Cervarix, being developed by GlaxoSmithKline) showed 100% efficacy in preventing precancerous lesions due to these virus types for up to 5.5 years. The initial study was a double-blind, controlled trial of 1113 women (aged 15-25 years) who were randomised to receive three doses of the vaccine or placebo at 0, 1 and 6 months.
The extended follow-up included 776 women who were followed for up to 67 months. The vaccine induced a strong immune response in virtually 100% of women, which was sustained out to 5.5 years for both HPV types 16 and 18. At the end of the follow-up period, the average level of antibodies against both virus types was at least 11 times higher than those associated with natural infection.
Results showed 68% efficacy against precancerous lesions (CIN2+) and 38% efficacy against abnormal Pap smears, regardless of the type of cancer-causing virus detected. Further results showed that the vaccine provided significant protection against genetically similar viruses, with 88% efficacy against HPV 45 and 54% against HPV 31.
Stanley Gall, professor of obstetrics, gynaecology and women's health at the University of Louisville, Kentucky, USA, reported: "These new data demonstrate the longest duration of protection seen in any cervical cancer vaccine trial reported to date. They are exciting for the prevention of cervical cancer in women around the world."
Results from long-term follow-up of women given a quadrivalent HPV vaccine (Gardasil) also demonstrated sustained protection against precancerous lesions. A total of 21,000 women (16-25 years) in four cohorts have now been randomised to vaccine or placebo at day 1, and months 2 and 6. Efficacy in women receiving all three doses was 99-100%.
The vaccine proved highly effective against cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grades 2 and 3, precancerous lesions that are frequently caused by HPV 16. Only a single woman in the vaccine group presented with an early HPV type 16 lesion, compared to 42 in the placebo group with HPV 16 or 18 related cervical intraepithelial neoplasias of grades 2 or 3, or adenocarcinoma.
Darron Brown, professor of medicine, microbiology and immunology at Indiana University School of Medicine, reported: "After three years, we see that the vaccine remains highly effective against HPV 16 and 18 related precancerous cervical and other genital lesions caused by these HPV types. The high degree of efficacy and safety of this vaccine is remarkable." He noted that results from a study of cross-protection were 'very encouraging' but would not be available for a few more weeks.
Written by: Susan Mayor PhD
Freelance medical journalist
Copyright: Medical News Today
Not to be reproduced without permission of Medical News Today
MLA
14 Feb. 2012. <http://www.medicalnewstoday.com/articles/68211.php>
APA
http://www.medicalnewstoday.com/articles/68211.php.
Please note: If no author information is provided, the source is cited instead.
|
Rate this article: (Hover over the stars then click to rate) |
Patient / Public: |
or |
Health Professional: |
Visitor Opinions In Chronological Order (1)
Radiographer
posted by K Wells on 4 Feb 2009 at 11:43 amWere these "efficacy rates" composed of mostly women who did not have HPV and were married or monogamous, or just not sexually active?? HPV is GENITAL WARTS. Let's start calling it what it is! A sexually transmitted disease -- contracted and carried by men just as much as women... If they weren't exposed - then of course they didn't show any cancerous cells?!!
What about the more than one hundred strains of this virus that is circulating the globe that the Gardasil vaccine does NOT vaccinate against?
How can they possibly have "long-term" results when it's only been on the market for a few years?? The woman who helped develop this vaccine has spoken out against it's media-hysteria (no pun intended!) -driven outcry for mandatory vaccination against a SEXUALLY TRANSMITTED disease? In 11 year olds?? What happened to teaching our children to save themselves for marriage....
Shame on you trying to convince people that this vaccine is the miracle drug... do more research on BOTH sides of the story and make an un-biased report to present as "FACT" -- instead of guising your opinion as such...
Good luck
Add Your Opinion
Please note that we publish your name, but we do not publish your email address. It is only used to let you know when your message is published. We do not use it for any other purpose. Please see our privacy policy for more information.
If you write about specific medications or operations, please do not name health care professionals by name.
All opinions are moderated before being included (to stop spam)
Contact Our News Editors
For any corrections of factual information, or to contact the editors please use our feedback form.
![]()
Please send any medical news or health news press releases to:
Note: Any medical information published on this website is not intended as a substitute for informed medical advice and you should not take any action before consulting with a health care professional. For more information, please read our terms and conditions.




