Screening Embryos Before IVF Implantation Leads To Fewer Babies For Older Women, New Study
Featured ArticleMain Category: Fertility
Also Included In: Pregnancy / Obstetrics; Genetics; Women's Health / Gynecology
Article Date: 05 Jul 2007 - 0:00 PDT
| Patient / Public: | ![]() | |
| Healthcare Prof: | ![]() |
Preimplantation genetic screening (PGS) fails to improve IVF outcomes in older women; it leads to fewer pregnancies and live births, an embryologist from The Netherlands announced at the 23rd annual conference of the European Society of Human Reproduction and Embryology (ESHRE) in Lyon, France, yesterday.
The findings of the study are also published in the New England Journal of Medicine (NEJM).
Pregnancy rates of older women having IVF tend to be disappointingly low, wrote the researchers, and there is a view that screening embryos before implantation for problems such as aneuploidies (too few or too many chromosomes) is a way to improve the effectiveness of IVF for these women.
Sebastiaan Mastenbroek,from the Centre for Reproductive Medicine of the Academic Medical Centre of the University of Amsterdam, and his team tested this hypothesis and concluded that PGS should not be carried out routinely on embryos that are to be implanted in women over 35.
Mastenbroek and colleagues conducted a multi-centre, randomized, double-blind, controlled trial where they compared three cycles of IVF with and without PGS in 408 women aged between 35 and 41.
206 of the women were assigned to PGS, while the rest were not (non-PGS, or control group).
The ongoing pregnancy rate was considerably lower in the PGS group compared to the non-PGS group.
Mastenbroek said:
"We found that, at 12 weeks, 52 of the women in the PGS group were pregnant (25 per cent), whereas 74 of the control group (37 per cent) had an ongoing pregnancy."
"And the women in the PGS group also had a significantly lower live birth rate: 49 or 24 per cent, as opposed to 71 or 35 per cent, of the controls," he added.
The researchers concluded that:
"Preimplantation genetic screening did not increase but instead significantly reduced the rates of ongoing pregnancies and live births after IVF in women of advanced maternal age."
Speculating on their findings, the researchers said there could be several explanations for the failure of PGS to improve IVF in older women.
Perhaps it's the biposy of a cell from an early embryo (this is taken on day 3 after conception) that hampers successful implantation, said Mastenbroek, although the effect of biopsy alone has not yet been studied.
Also, there is a limit to the number of chromosomes that can be tested by PGS and that could lead to implantation of embryos that appear normal but are not. For instance IVF often produces mosaic embryos (more than one genetic individual), so testing a single cell does not analyse chromosomes representative of all the cells of the embryo.
Many IVF centres worldwide are using PGS more and more. In 2003 the ESHRE preimplantation genetic diagnosis (ESHRE-PGD) consortium received reports of more than 1,700 IVF cycles for which PGS were used. Since only 50 per cent of the IVF centres in the world report their data to the consortium, this figure is likely to be an under-estimate, said the researchers.
Talking about figures for the US, Mastenbroek said that:
"In a recent survey of 415 assisted reproductive technology clinics in the US, 186 respondents (45 per cent) reported that they had performed a total of 2,197 cycles of PGS in 2005."
Mastenbroek and colleagues are going on to study why PGS does not work. Even though there is no scientific evidence to support the effectiveness or otherwise of PGS apart from this study, patients and doctors are inclined to use it.
"The idea of screening embryos for chromosomal abnormalities to increase live birth rates in IVF is very plausible, and women of advanced maternal age are willing to undergo any technique that may provide them with a baby," Mastenbroek explained.
He also said that more studies are needed since their research only covered older women who have PGS:
"We believe our findings imply that the efficacy of the technique also needs to be investigated in other groups of women who are offered PGS, such as those who suffer recurrent miscarriage or repeated failure of IVF, since evidence for a benefit of PGS in these groups of women is currently still lacking."
"In Vitro Fertilization with Preimplantation Genetic Screening."
Mastenbroek, Sebastiaan, Twisk, Moniek, van Echten-Arends, Jannie, Sikkema-Raddatz, Birgit, Korevaar, Johanna C., Verhoeve, Harold R., Vogel, Niels E.A., Arts, Eus G.J.M., de Vries, Jan W.A., Bossuyt, Patrick M., Buys, Charles H.C.M., Heineman, Maas Jan, Repping, Sjoerd, van der Veen, Fulco.
N Engl J Med 2007 357: 9-17
Volume 357:9-17, July 5, 2007, Number 1
Click here for Abstract.
Click here for more information on Assisted Reproductive Technology (from the CDC).
Written by: Catharine Paddock
Writer: Medical News Today
Copyright: Medical News Today
Not to be reproduced without permission of Medical News Today
MLA
15 Feb. 2012. <http://www.medicalnewstoday.com/articles/76011.php>
APA
http://www.medicalnewstoday.com/articles/76011.php.
Please note: If no author information is provided, the source is cited instead.
|
Rate this article: (Hover over the stars then click to rate) |
Patient / Public: |
or |
Health Professional: |
Add Your Opinion
Please note that we publish your name, but we do not publish your email address. It is only used to let you know when your message is published. We do not use it for any other purpose. Please see our privacy policy for more information.
If you write about specific medications or operations, please do not name health care professionals by name.
All opinions are moderated before being included (to stop spam)
Contact Our News Editors
For any corrections of factual information, or to contact the editors please use our feedback form.
![]()
Please send any medical news or health news press releases to:
Note: Any medical information published on this website is not intended as a substitute for informed medical advice and you should not take any action before consulting with a health care professional. For more information, please read our terms and conditions.



