Search is Powered by Google
Breast Cancer News

Hypnosis Reduced Pain, After Effects And Cost Of Breast Cancer Surgery

rate icon Featured Article
Main Category: Breast Cancer
Also Included In: Pain / Anesthetics;  Psychology / Psychiatry
Article Date: 29 Aug 2007 - 12:00 PDT

email icon email to a friend   printer icon printer friendly   write icon view / write opinions   rate icon rate article
Current Article Ratings:

Patient / Public:5 stars

5 (2 votes)

Health Professional:4 and a half stars

4.5 (4 votes)

Article Opinions: 0 posts

A new US study showed that using hypnosis before breast cancer surgery led to patients reporting less pain and fewer unpleasant after effects and it saved hospital costs. Procedures took less time and the amount of anesthetic required was also reduced, said the authors of the study.

The study is published in the 28th August online issue of the Journal of the National Cancer Institute and is the work of scientists at the Mount Sinai School of Medicine, New York, and colleagues.

Patients undergoing surgery for breast cancer often have unpleasant side effects including nausea and fatigue both during and after the procedure. This results in longer hospital stays, can sometimes lead to readmission, or extra medication, with a corresponding increase in cost.

Other studies have suggested hypnosis may reduce pain, recovery time and post operative medication.

Co-author of the study, Dr Guy Montgomery of the Mount Sinai School of Medicine, and colleagues carried out a clinical trial to find out the effects of hypnosis when given one hour or less before the operation.

200 female breast cancer surgery patients were randomly assigned to one of two groups: the hypnosis group and the control group.

The patients in the hypnosis group had 15 minutes of hypnosis administered by a psychologist. This was long enough for the psychologist to suggest how best to relax and imagine pleasant visual imagery, and the patients were also taught some pain reduction techniques, how to reduce nausea and fatigue and how to administer basic self hypnosis.

The patients in the control group just had a chat with a psychologist.

Montgomery and colleagues compared the results of the two groups. They analysed use of pain medication, use of sedatives during surgery, and the reported levels of pain and side effects after surgery.

They found that compared to the control group, patients in the hypnosis group: The authors wrote that:

"Together, the combination of potential improvements in symptom burden for the hundreds of thousands of women facing breast cancer surgery each year and the economic benefit for institutions argues persuasively for the more widespread application of brief presurgical hypnosis."

A drawback of the study was that patients were not blinded to their assigned groups and there was no formal assessment of the pros and cons of blinding on the treatment administrators. This would be normal procedure in a more rigorous blinded controlled trial.

The authors also said that they don't know whether the hypnosis would have been as effective if it had not been administered by non-psychologists.

The study concluded that:

"Hypnosis was superior to attention control regarding propofol and lidocaine use; pain, nausea, fatigue, discomfort, and emotional upset at discharge; and institutional cost. Overall, the present data support the use of hypnosis with breast cancer surgery patients."

The history of hypnosis in medicine and the scientific evidence on the pain reducing effects of the treatment are described in an accompanying editorial by Dr David Spiegel of Stanford University School of Medicine in Palo Alto, California. Spiegel said:

"It has taken us a century and a half to rediscover the fact that the mind has something to do with pain and can be a powerful tool in controlling it."

"It is now abundantly clear that we can retrain the brain to reduce pain: "float rather than fight", he added.

"A Randomized Clinical Trial of a Brief Hypnosis Intervention to Control Side Effects in Breast Surgery Patients."
Guy H. Montgomery, Dana H. Bovbjerg, Julie B. Schnur, Daniel David, Alisan Goldfarb, Christina R. Weltz, Clyde Schechter, Joshua Graff-Zivin, Kristin Tatrow, Donald D. Price, Jeffrey H. Silverstein.
J Natl Cancer Inst 2007; 99:1304-1312.
Published online 28 Aug 2007.
doi:10.1093/jnci/djm106

Click here for Abstract.

Written by: Catharine Paddock
Copyright: Medical News Today
Not to be reproduced without permission of Medical News Today


Personalized Homepage Weekly Newsletters Daily News Alerts
Opioid Induced Constipation ADHD Anxiety Asthma Autism Cancer Diabetes Lung Cancer Lupus Medicare / Medicaid Obesity and BMI Pancreatic Cancer Stem Cells All 'What Is...' Articles All 'How To...' Articles

Ophthalmology Urology
About Us News Licensing Free Website Feeds Free Tools & Content Tell a Friend Accessibility Help / FAQ Article Submission Links Contact Us

add medical news today to your facebook
medical news gadget

Swine Flu Image

Swine Flu Updates

- Latest Swine Flu News
- What is Swine Flu?
- Map Of H1N1 Outbreaks
- Swine Flu - Top 20 FAQ
- Daily Email News Alerts
Stick with Medical News Today for the latest news updates on swine flu.


These are the most read articles from this news category for the last 6 months:
Top Article Star
Understanding And Treating Triple-Negative Breast Cancer
07 Jan 2009
Triple-negative breast cancer is a subtype of breast cancer that is clinically negative for expression of estrogen and progesterone receptors (ER/PR) and HER2 protein. It is characterized by its unique molecular profile...


Treating HER2+ Breast Cancer image Treating HER2+ Breast Cancer

There are at least four different kinds of breast cancer and each is treated differently. For HER2+ breast cancer, a chemotherapy drug is typically the best option. Here's an overview of the drugs used to treat breast cancer...

Breast Cancer Treatment: Get Involved image Breast Cancer Treatment: Get Involved

Today, breast cancer patients may be treated by a multidisciplinary team of specialists, consisting of nurses, oncologists, surgeons, social workers, nutritionists and genetic counselors. However, patients, too, have a critical role in their treatment...

View more videos...