US Employer Health Premiums Up 6.1 Per Cent
Featured ArticleMain Category: Health Insurance / Medical Insurance
Article Date: 12 Sep 2007 - 3:00 PDT
| Patient / Public: | ![]() |
4.29 (7 votes) |
| Healthcare Prof: | ![]() |
3 (4 votes) |
| Article Opinions: | 3 posts |
Employer sponsored health insurance premiums in the US went up on average by 6.1 per cent in 2007 compared to 2006, outstripping workers' pay (rose by 3.7 per cent on average) and overall inflation (up by 2.6 per cent).
These are the key findings of the 2007 Employer Health Benefits Survey announced this week by the Kaiser Family Foundation and Health Research and Educational Trust. A version of the report is published in the September/October issue of the journal Health Affairs.
The average health insurance premium for a family now amounts to 12,106 dollars a year, with workers on average paying 3,281 dollars.
Dr Drew E Altman, President and CEO of Kaiser said while there was evidence of some "moderation" in the increases (this latest figure is an eight year low in the rate of increase) there was still no cause to celebrate:
"Every year health insurance becomes less affordable for families and businesses. Over the past six years, the amount families pay out of pocket for their share of premiums has increased by about 1,500 dollars."
Dr Mary A Pittman, President of the Health Research and Educational Trust (HRET) said the greatest burden of all health care costs falls to low wage earners, for whom the number of options is limited. Also, the numbers of uninsured continue to rise, she said:
"Although the economy seems to be strong, between 2005 and 2006 the total number of uninsured still rose by 5 percent, including a 9 percent increase in the number of uninsured children."
158 million Americans rely on employer-sponsored health insurance, and the annual report by Kaiser and HRET details how trends in employer coverage are changing, including with respect to availability and cost.
The survey was carried out between January and May of 2007 by randomly sampling 3,078 non-federal public and private firms employing three or more workers. 1,997 of the firms answered all the questions in the telephone survey and 1,081 completed a single question about coverage.
The overall response rate was 49 per cent and the authors used the 0.05 per cent confidence level as the test of significance in the statistical analysis, unless otherwise stated.
Although premiums went up faster than wages, the gap this year is considerably smaller than it was four years ago (2.4 per cent compared with 10.9 per cent) when premiums rose by 13.9 per cent and wages only by 3 per cent.
Gary Claxton of Kaiser, and colleagues, authors of the Health Affairs article on the report concluded that enrollment in different types of health plan did not change significantly, and there was only a modest growth in enrollment in high deductible plans with a savings option.
They also wrote that:
"Despite the comparatively low rate of increase in premiums and a strong labor market, the percentage of the workforce obtaining coverage from employer-sponsored plans remained unchanged since 2006."
"Health Benefits In 2007: Premium Increases Fall To An Eight-Year Low, While Offer Rates And Enrollment Remain Stable."
Gary Claxton, Jon Gabel, Bianca DiJulio, Jeremy Pickreign, Heidi Whitmore, Benjamin Finder, Paul Jacobs, and Samantha Hawkins.
Health Affairs, September/October 2007; 26(5): 1407-1416.
Click here for Abstract.
Click here for the full report: Employer Health Benefits 2007 Annual Survey (Kaiser/HRET).
Written by: Catharine Paddock
Copyright: Medical News Today
Not to be reproduced without permission of Medical News Today
MLA
14 Feb. 2012. <http://www.medicalnewstoday.com/articles/82218.php>
APA
http://www.medicalnewstoday.com/articles/82218.php.
Please note: If no author information is provided, the source is cited instead.
|
Rate this article: (Hover over the stars then click to rate) |
Patient / Public: |
or |
Health Professional: |
Visitor Opinions In Chronological Order (3)
Insurance Premiums
posted by Liz on 12 Sep 2007 at 8:21 amI am a single parent with three children. I do not reeieve child support nor do I recieve (or want to recieve) state assistance. I pay $6448.00 a year for health insurance for me and my children. That's $124.50 a week. Add that to $150.00 a week in child care, and their is not much left over. Even though we have health insurance, we rarley go to the doctor because I still have to pay $30.00 per office visit. Someone needs to look at the health care problem and come up with a good solution. I was hospitalized in May with meningitis and my portion (after the insurance paid) is $2300.00. Thats outrageous!!
USA
Insurance Premiums Rise
posted by Richard S. on 12 Sep 2007 at 5:21 pmThere are two main reasons for double digit growth of health insurance premiums. The first is law suits with no ceiling. The second is the direct result of government regulations. By that I mean that the government is the reason premiums are so high. The government is the one who demanded that anyone can walk into an ER room and get "FREE" treatment. The result of this law was that the people who pay health insurance premiums need to pay for not only themselves, but the "FREE" customers.
That's ridiculous. Try running any business where half ot your customer can walk in and demand your product for no charge. How long would any business be solvent? The way to "fix" the health insurance problem is to undo the law that demands the ER rooms treat anyone who has no insurance. Believe it or not, that is the way it originally was! That was when health insurance premiums actually declined year after year! For those who say "What about those who can not afford the premiums" I respond with these two points:
1) As soon as the only people allowed in the ER rooms are "paying customers", the premiums will drop very fast.
2) If having health insurance is so important, why haven't you gotten a second job, improved your demand in the workplace by gettin a degree or learning a trade, etc. Getting health care is ONLY the responsibility of the person
needing the ER. No one else should be burdened with the bill.
Do I ask anyone to buy me a new car, house, food or clotheing? No.
I earn the money ot do without. The smae should be for health care.
It is NOT a right. It is something to be earned just like food, clothing and shelter. Get out of my back pocket.
Incredible
posted by Barry Whiteside on 13 Sep 2007 at 12:30 pmAs an Englishman I read these US opinions and realize how far the USA has fallen behind its competitors with regard to its population's health and health care services. Somebody told me the other day that universal health care, for all, does not exist over there. I laughed - but, apparently, it's true.
In the rest of the developed world, the Richard S. opinion would have been a piece of text from a history lesson on the 19th Century.
How can the USA spend 8% of its national economy and not manage to cover everyone, while the European Union does so with a 4.9% of GDP spending on healthcare. Something very dodgy is going on in America, and it's not the so-called 'free loaders' - more likely it is rampant corruption, ineptitude and cronyism.
Add Your Opinion
Please note that we publish your name, but we do not publish your email address. It is only used to let you know when your message is published. We do not use it for any other purpose. Please see our privacy policy for more information.
If you write about specific medications or operations, please do not name health care professionals by name.
All opinions are moderated before being included (to stop spam)
Contact Our News Editors
For any corrections of factual information, or to contact the editors please use our feedback form.
![]()
Please send any medical news or health news press releases to:
Note: Any medical information published on this website is not intended as a substitute for informed medical advice and you should not take any action before consulting with a health care professional. For more information, please read our terms and conditions.




