Mobile Phones Do No Harm, UK Report
Featured ArticleMain Category: Public Health
Also Included In: Neurology / Neuroscience; Cancer / Oncology
Article Date: 13 Sep 2007 - 11:00 PDT
| Patient / Public: | ![]() |
4.15 (39 votes) |
| Healthcare Prof: | ![]() |
3.33 (12 votes) |
| Article Opinions: | 1 posts |
A six year research porgramme set up by the UK government reported on Tuesday that the evidence so far does not link mobile phones to harmful effects on human health or biology. However, the report said the the vast majority of available evidence relates to short term use, and further research is needed before one can be certain of longer term effects.
The programme is called the UK Mobile Telecommunications and Health Research (MTHR) Programme and was set up in 2001 with a budget of 8.8 million pounds in response to the independent government commissioned "Stewart Report". The funds came from government and industry sources and are managed on behalf of MTHR by the Department of Health.
The MTHR Programme comprises 28 research projects, based mostly at UK universities. 23 of the projects are now complete and have published their findings in various peer reviewed journals. More papers are in the pipeline.
The MTHR is managed by a committee of independent experts, mostly senior university academics. The current chairman is Professor Lawrie Challis, OBE, Emeritus Professor of Physics at Nottingham University. He spoke of the report in a prepared statement:
"This is a very substantial report from a large research programme. The work reported today has all been published in respected peer-reviewed scientific or medical journals."
"The results are so far reassuring but there is still a need for more research, especially to check that no effects emerge from longer term phone use from adults and from use by children," he added.
"We cannot rule out the possibility that there's an association for exposures for more than 10 years; the numbers appeared to show some slight hint. Although that is, in no way convincing, it's a faint suggestion that needs to be followed up," said Challis.
The Report 2007 gathers evidence from the time of the 2000 Stewart Report and more up to date knowledge. It includes findings from MTHR projects and research done elsewhere and suggests likely future directions for science to investigate.
According to the MTHR Report, with respect to short term exposure:
- There is no association between short term mobile phone use and brain cancer.
- Studies on volunteers found no evidence that brain function was affected by signals from mobile phones and emergency service signals (TETRA).
- The MTHR management committee does not see the need to support more research in this area.
- The Programme included the largest and most robust research studies on electrical hypersensitivity and mobile phone use in the world.
- They found no evidence that unpleasant symptoms reported by people with electrical hypersensitivity are caused by exposure to signals from mobile phones or base stations.
- In terms of cell biology, there is no evidence that mobile phones alter cells and tissue apart from heating them.
- The MTHR management committee does not see the need to continue to research this area.
The MTHR committee recommends more research into the long term effects of mobile phones on adults and children.
Other projects in the Programme have investigated the signal strength of base stations (micro cell and pico cell) at various public places such as airports, shopping malls and train stations. The results show them to be well within international guidelines.
And another group of studies found that using a mobile phone while driving, whether hands free or hand held, had the same effect on reducing performance as other in-car distractions, but there were indications that the demands on cognitive and thinking processes may be greater from using a mobile phone.
Click here for the full MTHR Report 2007 (PDF).
Written by: Catharine Paddock
Copyright: Medical News Today
Not to be reproduced without permission of Medical News Today
MLA
12 Feb. 2012. <http://www.medicalnewstoday.com/articles/82451.php>
APA
http://www.medicalnewstoday.com/articles/82451.php.
Please note: If no author information is provided, the source is cited instead.
|
Rate this article: (Hover over the stars then click to rate) |
Patient / Public: |
or |
Health Professional: |
Visitor Opinions In Chronological Order (1)
Mobile Phones Do No Harm, UK Report
posted by J.Curtis on 20 Sep 2007 at 4:12 amI would be fascinated to know why the conclusions of this UK report are so entirely at odds with the conclusions of the very comprehensive and convincing report recently published under the title, "BioInitiative: A Rationale for a Biologically-based Exposure Standard for Electromagnetic Radiation."
Perhaps the work of the latter group relied, as they wrote, "on tools and approaches across the physical, biological and engineering sciences; and those of the environmental scientist and public health professional."
And perhaps the lack of a sufficiently broad point of view among the UK authors contributed to a basic disagreement about when the evidence of harm is sufficient to take action. Clearly whatever "standard of evidence” is selected to assess the strength of the science will deeply influence the authors' conclusions, as well as ultimate decisions on public policy.
It would be unfortunate if this were to become yet another case of too little regulation, too late.
Add Your Opinion
Please note that we publish your name, but we do not publish your email address. It is only used to let you know when your message is published. We do not use it for any other purpose. Please see our privacy policy for more information.
If you write about specific medications or operations, please do not name health care professionals by name.
All opinions are moderated before being included (to stop spam)
Contact Our News Editors
For any corrections of factual information, or to contact the editors please use our feedback form.
![]()
Please send any medical news or health news press releases to:
Note: Any medical information published on this website is not intended as a substitute for informed medical advice and you should not take any action before consulting with a health care professional. For more information, please read our terms and conditions.






