US Government Gets Aggressive Against E Coli O157:H7
Featured ArticleMain Category: Infectious Diseases / Bacteria / Viruses
Also Included In: Nutrition / Diet; Public Health; Regulatory Affairs / Drug Approvals
Article Date: 24 Oct 2007 - 10:00 PDT
| Patient / Public: | ![]() |
5 (3 votes) |
| Healthcare Prof: | ![]() |
4 (2 votes) |
| Article Opinions: | 1 posts |
The US Department of Agriculture Food Safety and Inspection Service (FSIS) said yesterday, October 23rd, that is was taking "aggressive action" in the fight against E. coli O157:H7, following recent outbreaks in contaminated ground beef products. The actions include more testing and faster product recalls, said FSIS in a press release.
US Under Secretary for Food Safety Dr. Richard A. Raymond, said:
"We want the American consumer to know that FSIS has taken a number of aggressive actions to respond to a recent increase in E. coli O157:H7 recalls and illnesses associated with this pathogen and we are further expanding these efforts."
In June this year FSIS noticed there was a higher than usual incidence of E. Coli O157:H7 in tests on beef, plus a larger than usual number of recalls and reports of illnesses related to the bacteria compared with previous years.
This prompted the agency to increase testing of ground beef for E. coli O157:H7 by more than 75 percent in July and to start follow up testing of federally inspected beef plants that had tested positive for E. coli O157:H7. Schemes scheduled for spring of 2008 were brought forward, as were plans to review suppliers and processors according to a new checklist. These are to start as soon as relevant staff complete the training which starts next week.
Under Secretary Raymond said that:
"Lessons learned from a number of recalls including the recent Topps recall emphasized the need for us to do even more to strengthen our policies and programs."
"We also realized that to make risk-based inspection in processing most effective, we need to strengthen our database that will support that system," he added.
In order to speed up the overall detection and containment process, FSIS has identified the steps necessary to make sure inspection staff and the industry understand the "nature of the challenge presented by E. coli O157:H7" so suppliers and processors can identify an emerging problem sooner rather than later and prevent contaminated goods going to market.
FSIS has outlined how it intends to tighten up federal inspection of raw beef producers. This includes:
- Testing and analysis of trim. FSIS suspects, but is awaiting confirmation from lab tests, that beef trim is a source of E. coli O157:H7 in ground beef. By testing this key ingredient earlier in the production chain it should pre-empt or at least reduce the chance of contamination further down the chain before it reaches consumers. It also provides a source of data essential for analysis and planning actions to reduce the upward recent trends in contamination.
- Verifying control of E. coli O157:H7. From next month, all beef plants will have to show they are controlling E. coli O157:H7 during slaughter and processing. FSIS has given the industry criteria, with examples, that explain the minimum standards that are required of a "well controlled process". FSIS will be able to see which plants meet the standards and which do not.
- New checklist for verifying control. FSIS inspectors will be reviewing suppliers and processors using a new checklist once they have undergone training scheduled to start at the end of this month. Reviews based on the checklists will provide FSIS with quarterly data on significant changes in a plant's production controls and ensure it takes corrective action.
- More rapid recalls. These will be possible because FSIS now takes into account more evidence across a broader range of sources in order to decide whether a recall is warranted. FSIS gave examples of recent cases where epidemiological evidence linked illness to opened, FSIS-inspected product found in consumers' freezers.
- Targeting routine testing. From January next year, FSIS will start routine E. coli O157:H7 sampling of targeted slaughter and grinding facilities. At present the system is that all plants have an equal chance of being tested. But when the new verification testing program is brought in, FSIS will test facilities that handle larger volumes more frequently than before. They will use results from the reviews using the new checklists to decide how often plants should be tested.
- Testing more domestic and imported ground beef components. These tests are in addition to the tests on beef trim, the primary component of raw ground beef. Countries supplying ground beef to the US will be required to conduct equivalent tests.
- Ensuring safety of imported beef products. FSIS has informed countries that export raw beef to the US of the new US federal policies, standards and procedures for reducing E. coli O157:H7 risk and is working with them to make sure they implement the equivalent or better.
The Topps Meat Company went out of business earlier this month after recalling over 20 million pounds of beef following the announcement that cases of people being ill from E. coli O157:H7 were linked to its ground beef hamburger products. The company was established in 1940 and was the biggest maker of frozen hamburgers in the US.
Media reports have criticized FSIS for failing to act fast enough after it first got the news that linked the illnesses to the Topps products.
Click here for FSIS.
Written by: Catharine Paddock
Copyright: Medical News Today
Not to be reproduced without permission of Medical News Today
MLA
15 Feb. 2012. <http://www.medicalnewstoday.com/articles/86592.php>
APA
http://www.medicalnewstoday.com/articles/86592.php.
Please note: If no author information is provided, the source is cited instead.
|
Rate this article: (Hover over the stars then click to rate) |
Patient / Public: |
or |
Health Professional: |
Visitor Opinions In Chronological Order (1)
Look At The Big Picture.
posted by Karl A. Bettelheim on 15 Nov 2007 at 10:05 amComments on Report:
US Government Gets Aggressive Against E Coli O157:H7
Article Date: 24 Oct 2007 - 10:00 PDT
I am a recently retired microbiologist, who has worked for over 40 years on both pathogenic and commensal E. coli, and I have published well over 100 papers, reviews and book chapters in this field. A colleague from USA has recently drawn my attention to this website and to the apparently significant and disturbing increase in E. coli O157:H7 infections and contaminations, which have occurred in USA over the last few months.
I would like to make some comments on these matters which I think have not sufficiently been taken into consideration.
1. E. coli occur ubiquitously in the intestinal tracts of both humans and food animals like sheep and cattle.
2. There are strong indications that there are species specificities in the serotypes of E. coli carried by different hosts.
3. Shigatoxigenic E. coli (STEC) appear to be present in small numbers in virtually all sheep and cattle intestinal tracts.
4. Most of these STEC are belong to a variety of serotypes. Some appear more pathogenic to humans than others.
5. Cattle have also been shown to carry strains of E. coli, which appear identical in respect to STEC, except that they do not produce Shiga toxin(s). These may well be the reservoirs for the STEC.
6. E. coli in general and STEC in particular survive the slaughtering procedures and can be readily isolated from retail meats especially meats derived from cattle and sheep.
7. STEC O157:H7 are frequently also present in the intestinal tracts of cattle and sheep but in relatively smaller numbers than other STEC serotypes.
8. There are strong indications that some STEC serotypes, but probably not O157:H7 have a host specificity and are only found in either cattle or sheep.
9. This specificity is also demonstrated by the observations that the subtypes of toxin produced by bovine derived STEC, differ from those produced by ovine derived STEC.
10. STEC serotypes, commonly carried by cattle and sheep include O26:H11; O26:H-; O111:H-; O113:H21 and a number of others, which have being reported around the world as causes of severe human infections, including haemolytic uremic syndrome (HUS).
11. Most laboratories only test for the STEC serotype O157:H7 and ignore the fact that there may well be many other STEC serotypes present.
12. The severity of cases of HUS can depend on the presence in the patient of more than one serotype of STEC. The bigger the variety of serotypes present, the worse the clinical course of the infection.
It is my contention that attempting to tackle the problem of STEC infections by just looking at O157:H7, will never even approach the problem. It is essential to look at the ‘big picture’ and the role(s) of all STEC and other E. coli both the commensal as well as the pathogenic ones.
I would be happy to provide further information on these matters.
Yours sincerely
Karl A. Bettelheim Ph.D., M.Sc., F.R.C.Path.
Add Your Opinion
Please note that we publish your name, but we do not publish your email address. It is only used to let you know when your message is published. We do not use it for any other purpose. Please see our privacy policy for more information.
If you write about specific medications or operations, please do not name health care professionals by name.
All opinions are moderated before being included (to stop spam)
Contact Our News Editors
For any corrections of factual information, or to contact the editors please use our feedback form.
![]()
Please send any medical news or health news press releases to:
Note: Any medical information published on this website is not intended as a substitute for informed medical advice and you should not take any action before consulting with a health care professional. For more information, please read our terms and conditions.




