Conference Committee To Finalize Spending Bill Package
Main Category: Public HealthArticle Date: 02 Nov 2007 - 9:00 PDT
| Patient / Public: | ![]() |
5 (1 votes) |
| Health Professional: | ![]() |
|
| Article Opinions: | 0 posts |
A House and Senate conference committee on Thursday will meet to finalize an almost $700 billion package that includes the fiscal year 2008 Defense (HR 3222), Labor-HHS-Education (HR 3043) and Military Construction-Veterans Affairs (HR 2642) appropriations bills, the AP/Contra Costa Times reports (Babington, AP/Contra Costa Times, 10/31).
The package, which President Bush has threatened to veto, includes about 70% of the total $955 billion in discretionary spending that Democrats seek for FY 2008. Bush has threatened to veto the Labor-HHS-Education bill because the legislation exceeds his request for discretionary spending by $9 billion but has not threatened to veto the other two bills (Kaiser Daily Health Policy Report, 10/31).
House Appropriations Committee ranking member Jerry Lewis (R-Calif.) on Wednesday proposed a motion to prevent the attachment of the Labor-HHS-Education bill to the other two bills (Clarke, CQ Today, 10/31). However, the House voted 222-191 to reject the motion (Rogers, Wall Street Journal, 10/31).
Democrats maintain that the combination of the three bills into one package "is the only way to pressure Bush into signing" the Labor-HHS-Education bill, the AP/Times reports. However, the package likely will not resolve "Congress' appropriations struggles," with "many Republicans backing the White House," according to the AP/Times (AP/Contra Costa Times, 10/31).
According to CQ Today, with Bush likely to veto the package -- and "Democrats appearing not to have enough votes to override the veto -- it's unclear what Democrats will do next" (CQ Today, 10/31). Congress likely will have to pass a second continuing resolution to fund Cabinet departments and federal agencies after the current CR expires on Nov. 16, CongressDaily reports (Cohn, CongressDaily, 11/1).
Access to NIH Studies
In related news, the finalization of the FY 2008 Labor-HHS-Education appropriations bill could help resolve a "long-simmering debate over whether the results of government-funded research should be made freely available to the public," the Washington Post reports (Weiss, Washington Post, 11/1). Both the House and Senate versions of the bill include a provision that would make the results of studies funded by NIH available to the public at no cost one year after publication (Luntz, Washington Examiner, 10/31).
According to supporters of the provision, U.S. residents -- who have funded such studies through their taxes -- should not have to pay for medical and scientific journal subscriptions to view the results (Washington Post, 11/1). However, according to opponents of the provision, the federal government should not interfere with a private business that provides a service to the scientific community (Washington Examiner, 10/31).
Opinion Piece
"We'll have the federal government in shutdown mode in several weeks unless Congress kicks the can down the road with another continuing resolution," columnist David Ignatius writes in a Post opinion piece. According to Ignatius, "Late appropriations have become a chronic problem, whichever party controls Congress," and "Congress' failure under both parties to do its most basic job -- fund the federal government -- is a national disgrace." He concludes, "If they were normal federal employees rather than solons of Congress, they would have been fired long ago for gross incompetence" (Ignatius, Washington Post, 11/1).
Reprinted with kind permission from http://www.kaisernetwork.org. You can view the entire Kaiser Daily Health Policy Report, search the archives, or sign up for email delivery at http://www.kaisernetwork.org/dailyreports/healthpolicy. The Kaiser Daily Health Policy Report is published for kaisernetwork.org, a free service of The Henry J. Kaiser Family Foundation© 2005 Advisory Board Company and Kaiser Family Foundation. All rights reserved.
|
Please rate this article: (Hover over the stars then click to rate) |
Patient / Public: |
or |
Health Professional: |
Any medical information published on this website is not intended as a substitute for informed medical advice and you should not take any action before consulting with a health care professional. For more information, please read our terms and conditions.
Contact Our News Editors
For any corrections of factual information, or to contact the editors please use our feedback form.
![]()
Please send any medical news or health news press releases to:
| Back to top | Back to front page | List of All Medical Articles |
| Privacy Policy | Terms and Conditions | © 2009 MediLexicon International Ltd |





